Topics

1

Lenses / Realy wide wide angel lens

« on: March 23, 2012, 10:01:14 AM »

Hi there.
I today have a 1D mk III, and a Samyang 14 mm f.2,8. But i am thinking of getting a lens that is almost as good as Nikon 14-24 f.2,8. Canons only option here ( in my mind ) is 14 mm f.2,8L mk II. But i would desperatly wanted a fleksibel wide angel zoom in the area 14-24 or even better 12-20 or so.
So why dont Canon come up with a good enough zoom that can compete with Nikon 14-24.
Because of this issue. Im thinking of moving over to Nikon. But i would rather stay with Canon. And if they do come up with a really wide wide angel zoom. Then i would by that and get myself a 5D mk III with it so i can develope myself further into the art of photography

2

EOS Bodies / Sudio pictures

« on: November 11, 2011, 03:11:05 PM »

I have today a 1D mk III. But im planning to dedicate myself to some studio pictures / Portraits in the future. I am thinking of 5D mk II / mk III when it comes out.
What is the advantage with full frame vs APS-H when it comes to shooting pictures in a studio

3

Lenses / What lenses are you missing in the line up

« on: November 05, 2011, 05:54:54 AM »

I would love to have a
16 mm f.1,4
100 mm f.1,4
400-600 mm f.8 mirror refleks zoom with autofokus

4

Lenses / Will it be a EF 14-24 2,8 L is from Canon

« on: October 25, 2011, 06:53:57 AM »

I think that the EF 16-35 needs a replacement because of the bad performence on f.2,8. And Nikon has one that is superior. So will it be a completely new one with the zoom range 14-24 with is.

I want one for shure

5

Lenses / TS-E 17 mm f.4,0L or ef 14mm 2,8 L mk II

« on: September 10, 2011, 01:12:13 PM »

Maybe a stupid question. But im planning to buy a widangel lens in the near future. And since its really wide. Then everything should be in focus. But if you forget about the manuel focus vs autofocus. which one of these two are the best lens for landscape photography

6

Lenses / Any rumor about a new ef 400 f.5,6 L is ?

« on: August 21, 2011, 09:04:50 AM »

This lens is deeply missed. With the current one you cant handheld it

7

Canon General / Why does it say PowerShot SX30 IS under my name here in Canonrumors

« on: August 20, 2011, 05:47:09 PM »

I have never owned a camera like this in my life. I have a Eos 1 D mk III and not a PowerShot SX30 IS. 

8

Lenses / Lens for a big sun in the pictures

« on: August 20, 2011, 05:36:40 AM »

Hello.
Sitting and pondering on a new lens with a tele converter. Maybe a 3 x converter. My idea here is to take pictures like this. This picture I took this summer. But I want a bigger sun in the picture. And as you see it's not just that the detail is so important.
Therefore, I think of something that must be cheap and relatively easy.
Maybe a 300 mm f / 4.0 L is. Or does anyone know of anything that is even better. Some time ago I know that there was something called mirror lens. Is this something that just might work. But here comes the problems with the bokeh i think. Do not know how to say this in English. Everything that is light will make a round bubble in the pictures
But the main point is more to get a really big sun or moon in the pictures in the evening or in the night.
Any proposals are received with thanks

9

Lenses / EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 USM L IS

« on: June 26, 2011, 04:45:51 PM »

Has anybody heard if there is gonna be a mk II version on this one. Me myself dont like push-pull zooms because of the risk of dust into the camera

10

Lenses / sigma 12-24 mk II

« on: June 22, 2011, 06:40:11 AM »

Sorry that i put this one in a Canonrumor. But i wonder if anybody has tried this lens. I know that mk I version is crushed by the ef 17-40 http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=100&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=3&LensComp=369&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=2&APIComp=3 . But i need something really wide and would buy the Sigma if mk II is better than mk I

11

Lenses / EF 20 mm f.2,8

« on: June 18, 2011, 09:52:37 PM »

Any chanses that this lens wil be replaced or maybe there is a wider one coming to the marked. Not thinking about an L lens. But something affordeble in the wide lens marked

12

EOS Bodies / Is this scam

« on: June 10, 2011, 03:46:13 AM »

Link removed.  They appreciate you giving free advertising, all the search engines pick up the link and raise their rating.
 
The prizes is so low it has to be something wrong. sorry but i did not know what category to put this in

13

Lenses / I want a ef 18 mm f.1,8 L is. Canon can you here me

« on: June 08, 2011, 09:06:22 AM »

This one i deffenitly missing from the canon lenses. Do you think it ever will happen that Canon make such a lens ?

14

Lenses / Why did Canon make EF-S lenses

« on: June 07, 2011, 12:43:55 PM »

It`s stupid that they make lenses that doesent fit on a 1D serie. I want a 10-20 zoom. But it is only for 1,6 crop kamera. Canon is here forcing me to use a Sigma lens like 12-24 instead of providing a quality wide zoom to use on a 1D camera

15

Lenses / Why does not Canon have a 50-150 f.2,8 L is and a 150-300 f.2,8 L is lenses.

« on: June 05, 2011, 05:33:00 AM »

Because i would find it wery usefull if they did. I myself have a 17-40 and would find this zoom range 50-150 very useful indeed . So the next thing would naturally be a 150-300 f.2,8 L is zoom.
If they could make suche lenses. Im sure these two lenses would be very compact.