« on: September 26, 2014, 12:36:37 PM »
To all the people threatening to jump from Canon to Sony/Nikon...
When you bought your Canon camera, it was obviously because you needed/wanted its performance. It was good enough. Now suddenly it's not good enough? Did it deteriorate in quality? You bought a camera because its performance was what sought, and now its performance (which is the exact same as when you bought it) is not good enough? Y'all make me laugh. Hah.
Have you ever bought a new TV or a new Computer?
You still have a CRT monitor, not a TFT?
You still own your first canon camera?
Do you buy a worse product because of a brand name?
"Better" is the enemy of "good enough".
You clearly do not what you are talking about, it is not about good enough, it is about progress.
My first digital camera was a DCS 3c from Kodak/Canon, it cost as much as a small truck but I am not using it anymore, but it is as good as it was then.
And it is (apart from my MF-camera's) my most expensive camera....
Canon is far behind in studio / landscape camera's, and so I bought a Nikon.
Canon does not realise that not everyone is a sport-shooter.