July 22, 2014, 10:15:26 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - eninja

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1
PBD

how about, you show us group of images, shot from different lens (50L and others), then we choose which group of photos belongs to which lens.

because we consider a few magical photos before we say that the photo came out unique not just consider one photo. And no post processing.

2
Reviews / Re: Please help me love ef 35mm f2 IS vs 40mm pancake
« on: July 21, 2014, 09:57:53 AM »
Thanks guys.

I knew it there must be something behind the big glass.

The culprit, I was doing AFMA wrong. My target was wrong and I read somewhere that subject must be far enough.
So I download starburst chart and follow Neuro's post back in 2011.
See final AF results below (I resize the chart to fit A4, which was wrong cos AF box does not detect center starburst) - good enough

Now its time to compose some shots. :)

. AF Test
. 35mm f2 IS crop
. 40mm crop



3
Lenses / Re: Something with 50mm L lens that make it different
« on: July 20, 2014, 11:49:12 PM »
Some can see the Unqiue look in lenses, others can't. (Lomo Petzval Lens is a good example.) I like the 50L's unique look to the other canon 50mm's and It matters more to the photographer than client. Most clients can't tell the difference between a 550D and 1Dx in print but it's the photographers job know the difference for them.

So far none of you photographers has managed to pick out that "unique look", which illustrates my point perfectly and the extent of your credibility.

I can understand the 50% more light than a 1.4, I can understand the "I only use 'the best'" mentality, I can understand the satisfaction of arriving and working with top of the range gear and I can understand people aspiring to own that gear and enjoying using it for what it is. I cannot understand this constant "unique look" bull that nobody can actually identify, sure people give esoteric descriptions of subtleties mere mortals just can't see, bless us and our poor blind deluded selves, but I hate the fact that when challenged by somebody with a bit of experience and confidence every single one of you aficionados baulks, then fails to identify images shot with that "unique look".
If I'm shooting both the 1.4 and 1.2, I will know what images were with the 1.2. I will see the difference and that translates to a look I want.

However, I don't expect someone like yourself who hasn't shown any images of artistic merit of your own to understand this viewpoint. Perhaps you can attempt to map that on a test chart somewhere to add some credibility to your portfolio. :)

Of course you could.... No wait, if we go back to the last time we did this you couldn't tell the difference between the 135 f2 and the 100 f2.8 when used for the same shoot, so why should we believe you now?

As for the rest of your comment, it is a cheap shot at trolling, not gonna play.

Pbd,

I do get the point you trying to make.

But but but.

Sometime you cant just tell the difference, or sometimes you can. But people wont believe you.
I am referring to portrait shots. I wish I can share the pictures.
People argue on what they see and believe in, we can not blame anyone.

Remind me an instance. I am sure the color of petals is near to orange but she insist its near to red.
thus the argument. I can not give up because its really near to orange than red. but she insist sees otherwise.
maybe we are both correct, its how we see it.

Well Pdb, if you can not see it. then look again.
In my case, im still in doubt, thats why I ask..
good to know others also see the difference.

4
Lenses / Re: Something with 50mm L lens that make it different
« on: July 20, 2014, 11:11:23 PM »
This was my basis for starting this thread:

Few months ago i rented 50 1.2 L.

Recently, I have invested lens average lens, 35mm f2 IS, 40mm and 85mm 1.8,
I also have tried 24-105, 16-35 f2.8 and 24-70 2.8. I used to have 28 1.8.

looking at the pictures taken from these lenses. I always go back to the pictures taken by 50 1.2 L. Even at smaller apertures, the 50 1.2 L produces the wow effect (not all pictures, but most of them).

To be honest, i have not personally tried ef 50 1.4. only look at pictures on line.

Thus I post this thread and see how people like the 50 1.2 L.

5
Reviews / Re: Please help me love ef 35mm f2 IS vs 40mm pancake
« on: July 20, 2014, 09:51:45 PM »
Did you do an AF microadjustment on the 35/2 IS?

Hi Neuro, yes I did.
I will try compare AF and Liveview tonight. I will post images if necessary.

I AF microadjust, twice on two different days and result settings was different.
For my target I use white paper and paste it on a black paper - made sure corner of white paper is on the center of center AF point.
 
Subject distance is about 2 meters. (I forgot the rule on distance)

any comment on my set up?

thanks.

6
Reviews / Please help me love ef 35mm f2 IS vs 40mm pancake
« on: July 20, 2014, 09:23:33 PM »
I recently got a 10 month old 35mm f2 IS. On top of my two month old 40mm pancake.

I love the pictures coming out from pancake when it came, so sharp, so cute, so light, no distortion, i can make head shots with no enlarge parts.
6D and 40mm combination as light as like i was holding my nexus 7.

Recently, I invested on 35mm f2 IS.
I could not love the pictures at f2, portrait subject is not sharp, and its just giving me a headache looking at it.
at f2.8 picture almost identical on both lens.
I shoot 1/60 and faster so i eliminate the love for IS.

Field of view wise, with 40mm i can take one step backward and field of view is the same.

Maybe I'm doing it wrong. And need more time to play with 35mm. Or I could rent a 35L and see how it fairs.

again f2 is not a keeper at all. or my copy is not sharp as per normal.

7
Lenses / Something with 50mm L lens that make it different
« on: July 18, 2014, 04:36:32 AM »
i was comparing image taken by 50mm 1.2 L vs 1.4 version.
There something about the image produce by 1.2 L that makes it Wow factor for me.

Like it has something to do with the color and amount of sharpness and gradient balance of depth of field.

Can someone give me insight what the hell is it im liking with the 50mm 1.2 L?

8
I guess this was a wrong move for him to post this thread. Amateur his referring to may read this thread and follow all the advise you guys gave.

Thanks to this thread I learned few fundamentals.. Thanks for the input guys. I'm 30, just like most, I don't know where I'm headed, you never know what business idea works, might as well give it a try.

9
Lighting / Re: i spoil my speedlite by using DIY speed grid
« on: July 09, 2014, 11:04:55 PM »
If it doesn't affect your WB across the frame just live with it.

I agree, thanks.

I will test flash, for awhile. If the output is negligible or does not matter at all. I leave it that way, I even often use diffuser and shoot within 100mm focal length.

10
Lighting / Re: i spoil my speedlite by using DIY speed grid
« on: July 08, 2014, 08:20:35 PM »
If the super glue did not discolor the unit, you may be able to remove it with a de-bonding agent: http://www.supergluecorp.com/zap/zap-z-7-debonder

Often times super glue (cyanoacrylate) doesn't melt the underlying surface (like model cements) so if it did not discolor the surface you may be able to safely remove it. I'd try a small section and see what happens first.


Thanks, worth to try. I will collect back my un-service speedlite this weekend. I'll try post some pics to let you know the damage. Meanwhile I will purchase this de-bonder and hope will received soon.

Edit: I read its extremely flammable. Don't want to get flamed when something happened during shipping. I guess will just soak it onto water the disassembled parts.

11
Lighting / Re: i spoil my speedlite by using DIY speed grid
« on: July 07, 2014, 05:42:07 AM »
Even if it had dried, there is a chance it's not thermally stable.

True.

The quotation from canon service was quite expensive. So I guess I need to disassemble the flash head myself and clean the super glue residue.. Worst case, i might just live with it. Light still come out and I usually use a diffuser.

12
Lighting / i spoil my speedlite by using DIY speed grid
« on: July 02, 2014, 10:32:40 PM »
So I thought I better create DIY speed grid - it will be fun and save money. not to mention cool.

After googling it, what you will be needing are black straw, black cardboard, super glue and Scissors of course.
when down and bought a cheap super glue, - this was a trial for me, so might as well bought the cheap.
I just read the top part of the tutorial, should be easy.

And Wala! I made my DIY speed grid. Output light is so cool than my DIY snoot.

After doing like 30 min of portrait shot. When I woke up on the next morning. Took out my DIY snoot from flash head.

Shoot!!! - Where was my common sense - think out of the box did not work this time, and regret using the cheap super glue, or I should not use super glue after all. Stupid DIY tutorial - (self talking)

My flash light window together with the diffuser swivel is covered with super glue stain. all around. tsk!

- its 430 ex ii. - i was even hopin to sell it.

- hope canon service can fix this.

(Please excuse my broken grammar)

13
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: D810!!!
« on: June 26, 2014, 09:08:55 PM »
I feel sorry for Nikon owners.
It doesn't matter what model they buy, even when first released, as a few months down the track, Nikon will bring out a new and improved version of it making your current model obsolete and now worth substantially less than it cost you. Remember the D600 then the 610?
Canon does hang onto models much longer, and hence they have better re-sale value later on as say, after 3 years, your Canon may be just superseded, but if you had an equivalent Nikon, it would be 3 models old and practically worthless.

I'm not saying that Nikon cameras are no good, in fact, they are very good indeed, but constant model updates is not how you keep up the perceived and resale value of products.
It also makes it more difficult regarding spare parts too, as many models mean lots of parts and distributors only have so much space and money for parts.

True, i got a 6D, bought it when it came out. Honestly I would not be happy if Canon came out with a Mark II this year, with more low light cross type AF points and a touch screen (when I ask someone take picture of us/me, its surely OOF most of the time.)

1 more year should be ok..

14
Now im eyeing on Voigtlander 20mm.  ;D

when when oh when.
It really is a great partner to the 40 and they both use 52mm filters so can share!

Last time I was wondering where I knew about Voigtlander. So it was you.
Now I remembered where I got first introduced with the Voigtlander lens. It the post you started in sample image section.

Great. (y)

15
Now im eyeing on Voigtlander 20mm.  ;D

when when oh when.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6