March 06, 2015, 11:38:15 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - cbphoto

Pages: [1] 2
Canon General / Re: Canon to Buy Video Surveillance Leader Axis for $2.8b
« on: February 12, 2015, 02:20:54 PM »
Canon is being aggressive in a space that is projected to see a lot of growth.

Exponential growth if governments world-wide have any say in the matter.  :P

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: CN-E 35-260mm f/2.8 Soft Focus Lens
« on: January 11, 2015, 04:34:31 PM »
The lens is for the Super 35 image sensor size.

I suspect this lens has been designed for the C-series cinema cameras.

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon Products Announced Today
« on: January 05, 2015, 01:57:37 PM »
2015 ... 1/2.3" dwarf-sensor digicams with 20 MP and 1000x zoom. Just what the doctor ordered.

Agreed. What a snooze. Where do those ELF cameras sell? Japan?

I've worked alongside sports shooters who have gotten their rental/loaner gear from a magazine/news outlet "pool". They treat the gear like I treat a hammer or crowbar.

And all I want is the perfect studio/still life camera from Canon. All six of us studio wonks wish for that.  :-\

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Interested in Hasselblad?
« on: May 12, 2014, 04:11:53 PM »
Does Canon have any interest in purchasing Hasselblad? I don’t think so. Canon did have Hasselblad’s books open a few years ago, but that was probably more of a tire kicking exercise than actual interest in purchasing the company.

My guess is Canon was looking for intellectual property that would add more value to the purchase.

Some day soon we'll see

[CR2] Canon smartphone with EF mount to be announced at Photokina.

Until then we'll have to suffer through dozens of inane camera "enhancements".

PowerShot / Re: Canon to Leave the Entry Level Point & Shoot Market?
« on: February 25, 2014, 08:28:25 AM »
I'd be interested in a Canon smartphone, assuming it had an open architecture for apps.

We haven't used either of our Canon p&s cameras in four years—since we bought iPhones.

Here's hoping for an increase in dynamic range, and in signal-to-noise ratios.

Canon General / Re: Canon Can't Even Make a Billion Dollars Anymore
« on: October 26, 2012, 01:11:07 PM »
"Demand for interchangeable-lens digital cameras continued to realize robust growth in all regions while the market for compact digital cameras shrunk due to the stagnation of the global economy."

Sales of compact digital cameras will continue to shrink because of cell phone cameras & apps.

I've owned three Canon point & shoot cameras, but will probably never buy another one. For fun & easy, I use my cell phone and a couple apps to shoot, enhance and upload for family & friends to see. The last thing I want to do on vacation is saddle myself to a computer for post production on point & shoot images. To me, it's a no-brainer.

An image taken on vacation & uploaded within minutes after capture. And minutes before a nice swim!

Software & Accessories / Re: Google Buys Nik Software
« on: September 17, 2012, 01:22:27 PM »
This does not excite me. The last time a juggernaut bought a small company (Microsoft & iView Media Pro), the software languished to the point that it wasn't worth using. (I'm thankful for Phase One stopping that descent).

EOS Bodies / Re: Big Megapixels Coming Soon? [CR1]
« on: August 05, 2012, 02:20:54 AM »
I would love:
  • A 36+ Mp camera body from Canon
  • In a 1Dx-style body
  • The best dynamic range delivered at the lowest ISO values
  • Deliver more pixels rather than higher frame rates
  • Provide the best Live View focus/framing possible, in lieu of 60-point autofocus tech
  • Target the still-life/landscape/studio photographer, not the PJ or sports guy
  • Eventually eliminate the flapping mirror and provide an eye level HD video finder

Lighting / Re: Fauxtographer Ruins Olympic photos.
« on: July 02, 2012, 08:31:58 PM »
whew! Those pics are horrible!   :o

I'd like to see info on the Tamron's vignetting. In the few lenses I've compared over the years, Tamron lenses had much greater vignetting than Canon's, especially at wide open apertures.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D Mark III Information
« on: March 13, 2012, 11:31:21 AM »
There will come a day when high ISO values will mean little to the overall value of the camera. High ISO settings are still making a ripple because digital photography is relatively new, and film was the standard for IQ for over a century. Yeah, it's cool and it's very helpful under certain circumstances, but good IQ from high ISO settings are quickly becoming the norm (thankfully).

Eventually, users will manipulate their ISO settings just like we manipulate our aperture and shutter speeds. It will become the third adjustable variable in pro cameras, if it hasn't already.

EOS Bodies / Re: What's Next? A General Breakdown
« on: March 09, 2012, 07:40:55 PM »
From my seat, it looks like the 1Dx covers the sports/PJ/high ISO/rapid fire photographer, while the 5D3 targets the wedding and portrait market. The group that falls through the cracks is the still-life and fashion photographers who don't need 10 frames per second but do need more than 18 megapixels.

In my dreams, Canon is developing a 36mp camera. No video, no uberhigh ISO, no rapid fire. Just perfect image quality at low to medium ISO settings.

Dreaming's free!   ::)

Pages: [1] 2