March 02, 2015, 10:21:46 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - GammyKnee

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Black & White / Re: Black and White Landscapes!
« on: February 03, 2015, 02:34:21 PM »
A shot from Portencross last night. Freezing cold but surprisingly bright due to strong moonlight:

Midnight Delight [IMG_1117]
by GammyKnee, on Flickr

Lenses / Re: New 50mm & 70-300mm Coming Soon? [CR2]
« on: February 03, 2015, 09:15:15 AM »
my bet..50f2 IS stm....

What I want is an updated, trustworthy 50 1.4, but instead I'm expecting a 50 f2 IS non-stm, basically what they did for 35mm.

Photography Technique / Re: Which eye do you use?
« on: January 27, 2015, 07:45:59 PM »
I'm right-eye dominant and use this exclusively when looking through the VF. In fact I'm pretty much right-side dominant with everything (even hearing 'cos my left has tinnitus!), although just to be awkward I write with my left hand.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Yongnuo 35mm f/2 Canon Clone on the Way
« on: January 05, 2015, 10:01:31 AM »
The thread title may say "clone" but it looks to me like this is going to be even less of a direct copy than their 50mm offering. The spec says 7 blades (versus 5 in the ancient Canon) and the focus ring is located right at the front of the lens (vs mid barrel on the Canon). Possibly the optical arrangement is different too.

Personally I think it's good to have another lens manufacturer starting up. I'll be particularly interested to see how the AF holds up in use. Maybe they can pressure Sigma to raise their game, and Canon to lower their prices a bit?

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Have you repaired your 50 Art?
« on: December 30, 2014, 10:03:13 AM »
Padded cell next...

Intermittent faults drive me nuts too. I've been following the Sigma 50 saga in this and other threads, and I really sympathize with the frustration of it all. I take it there's no discernible pattern to the misbehavior at all? I'm thinking if there's some kind of mechanical or electrical fault things like temperature, carriage (bumpy roads? particular way of carrying the camera?) could play a role in determining what makes for a good day versus a nightmare.

FWIW I still haven't had the guts to try the 50 Art, but I did get a second hand Sigma 50 EX (yep, the older one) which is actually pretty dependable on my 5D3. It is at the same time dependably awful on my 5D2 despite numerous attempts at AFMA. Go figure, as they say.

Does anyone use the built-in levels in Canon cameras? For landscapes, I usually use the level. It isn't 100% accurate, but it is accurate enough to give you a proper gravitationally level horizon. Sometimes, I find that what I think is my horizon is actually may be the back curve of a lake shore or something. Curved aspects of a scene like that, when leveled, often throw out the "uprightness" of the rest of the scene.

I use the built-in level when I have it (I've got a 5D II & III) and a cheap flash mount bubble level when I don't, and for extra confidence I sometimes double-check against my (somewhat inconveniently located) tripod bubble levels. Despite all this care, I sometimes still end up struggling with leveling in post due to visual mis-cues like the ones you described. It's so frustrating when you get a shot that doesn't look straight even when you know that it is!

EOS Bodies / Re: 7D2 and EF 24 - 105 F4 L IS USM
« on: September 20, 2014, 05:10:34 PM »
I have to agree with other posters: the 24-105 is a capable & useful - though not outstanding - lens on a full frame body. Certainly there are times when I'm really glad I've got mine. However on a crop body there are better choices in terms of effective focal length range, max aperture & sharpness.

I really liked the ef-s 17-55 on my 7D; it was the very last crop lens to go as I switched over completely to full frame. But it all comes down to what you shoot and how you want to shoot it!

I tried a couple of new Sigmaluxes a while on my 5DII. Loved the lens optically, but the AF was a nightmare. I sent 'em back and got the Canon 50 1.4, which I've never really liked (not great in the AF dept either, halation when shooting at or near wide open, and wasn't keen on the bokeh in many situations).

Rolling forward to the present, I decided to try it one more time. I bought one second hand from eBay from a guy who insisted his copy focused well on his 5DIII and... it's not bad at all. It has a tendency to rear focus above a certain distance, but in the range I normally shoot it's pretty accurate & consistent, overall better than the Canon. And I really like the bokeh.

IMG_7271 by GammyKnee, on Flickr

That's at f2 which is about as wide as I normally shoot with this lens; my copy's actually pretty good even at f1.4 but I rarely go for DOF that shallow.

Here's another at f2.5

IMG_8726 by GammyKnee, on Flickr

Photography Technique / Re: Website launched!
« on: August 25, 2014, 12:19:18 PM »
Love your articles (great writing style BTW), excellent shots of course, and the site itself is well structured and easy to navigate. Loads nice and quickly too!

The only thing I would say, and bear in mind that this an entirely subjective thing, is that the "boxed" style (clearly outlined fixed width content area) along with the finish and arrangement of the navigation links looks a little retro to me. Like I said though, this is just my personal preference.

Lenses / Re: How many years before we see a 50L II
« on: July 26, 2014, 07:57:48 AM »
The part about loving it because good focus is rare and hard to achieve is a masterpiece in spin doctoring. :)

Beautifully put.

But this is why the 50L is such a divisive lens; some people by nature have an optimistic outlook and concentrate on the times that the AF hits, others dwell on the failures. Glass half full / half empty.

Next 50mm will be the 50mm f/1.8 IS.

I agree, I think that will be the next 50mm we see from Canon.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: HUMIDITY ALERT!
« on: July 18, 2014, 12:51:44 PM »
Just to add another option, I use"self indicating silica gel" bought from eBay in little drawstring nylon mesh pouches. The beads are pet and child safe and go from orange to brown/black when they've soaked up all they can. Empty them into a heat-proof container when they're done, nuke them in the microwave for 1 minute, let them cool and they're ready to be used again. Cost me £8 GBP and I've got 18 months out of them so far.

BTW I live on the West Coast of Scotland. Humidity here sometimes drops as low as 75%. That's on a dry sunny day (so only a couple of times a year then  ;D )

Software & Accessories / Re: Post processing workflow
« on: July 18, 2014, 12:40:12 PM »
I was being cheeky... but when I do ettr, the raw image is better to work with, but the jpg image out of the camera would look blah and over exposed... one of the reasons I don't bother with jpg.

 :) Totally agree with you over jpg. It's like food. If you've got to have it now, get the burger.. or wait a bit longer and have the perfectly cooked steak.

Lenses / Re: Something with 50mm L lens that make it different
« on: July 18, 2014, 12:35:19 PM »
50mm is becoming a really important focal length for me. Right now I've got the 1.4 (good to hear it can last if treated carefully!) but spend most of my time shooting at the bigger apertures, so obviously I keep thinking about either the 50L or possibly the new Sigma. I've looked through lots of shots taken with the 1.4, the 50L and the Sigma, and to my eyes (and in the right hands) the 50L can produce a look that the others can't quite match. It may be as much to do with its weaknesses as its strengths.

Think I going to have to try renting it before splashing the cash though; seems to be a bit of a "marmite" lens!

Software & Accessories / Re: Post processing workflow
« on: July 18, 2014, 12:13:36 PM »
I think I listen too much to people here... I expose to the right by a 3rd of a stop... so my images out of camera all look overexposed with little contrast and even less saturation.  But that is what post is for... fixing what I broke.

As long as you haven't clipped highlights then you haven't broken anything, just bring things back down in post and you should have a cleaner image - that's what ETTR is all about. I don't use it all the time, but it can help with some high ISO shots sometimes.

I think it's a shame that post processing sometimes gets associated with "fixing"; for me it's all about enhancing what's there.

Software & Accessories / Re: Post processing workflow
« on: July 17, 2014, 12:26:37 PM »
I would like to learn these, and many other things about image processing, from a scientific point of view. I want to learn facts, not magic recipes.

Edit: Just read through the thread properly(!) so here's my shortened response:

PP is just about getting a finished image that's a decent match for the mental vision you had when you took the photo. That's the driving force; when you don't have the PP knowledge/technique or tool to produce what you want, then you learn/buy and expand your repertoire. There's no need to use Photoshop if you can get what you want without it.

Personally I think a good way to get a handle on this is to join a forum that has an active "PP This" type of thread - a thread where someone posts up an image and other members each have a go at processing it, describing what what they did along the way, and why.  Here's one I'd recommend, in that it generally avoids the more adventurous edits (such as background/subject replacements) and has a generally helpful atmosphere:

You'll see lots of different "takes" on the same image. Which one is best? How long is that piece of string?

Pages: [1] 2 3 4