July 29, 2014, 07:44:28 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Khufu

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Honestly, I'd try to find a third party with a level head who can back you up in regards to etiquette and professional conduct which they've seemingly overlooked, at the least.
What they've done is likely out of naivety and ignorance (read "obliviousness", not "active-selfishness") and an ideal outcome would be for them to aknowledge they're at fault and compensate you (perhaps excessively, if we're still talking ideals!) ;)
It doesn't feel good to fight your own fights when you're ethically and legally right though potentially can look like an arse to those who undervalue your personal skills, efforts and investments.
I feel I'd step in if I were a colleague, but I'm not... There's a lot of sensitive psychology at play here which can be difficult for the most level headed and impartial to handle with ease.

In short, you've been taken advantage of, there's at least another human being who needs (NEEDS) an education in professional (mis)conduct and, er, there's a chance you're going to be daemonised simply for being a victim of circumstances and I highly recommend seeking the level headed, passionate and likeable allies whom I recommended above ;)

Please do keep us all updated on the situation, Barrfly - at the very least the rest of us can get an education and some perspective in regards to how spectacularly tits-up or productive this winds up being ;)

Lenses / Re: What Lenses are missing from Canon's range
« on: July 16, 2014, 01:41:19 PM »
I wasn't too thrilled with these newer sub-35mm IS primes all coming in at over f/2.8, though the older, small 24 & 28mm primes, if I recall correctly, have hideous vignetting which can only be considered "arty" or poor on ff... maybe some faster, small but affordable and ff-usable 16/20/24/28mm primes?

If you guys reckon the 400mm f/5.6L could have the IS treatment without adding too much weight or bulk I'd be into that! I do love that as it is its not much different to just chucking a flask of soup in my bag though, if a little less chickeny and nourishing...

Any speculations on what *else* the lens could be if not the 100-400L successor?

Personally I wouldn't mind seeing them revisit the 10x zoom lenses. I had a 35-350L for a short time, with failing AF so returned to dealer. Although it wasn't quite as good as the 100-400L on the long end, the extra wide end was welcome. I know the 28-300L replaced that, but we're getting a bit short again. Perhaps something like the Sigma 50-500 given the L treatment?

Knowing my luck, it'll be another 400mm f/5.6 prime...

I freaking love my 400mm f/5.6L - but can't imagine an update is on its way. There's going to be the 100-400mm L IS II (with built in unicorn horn screw mount) and asides from a new optical formula, which really isn't bad at all for 5D3 resolution, other upgrades like implementing IS just seem like they'd detract from the niche sellibg points of the prime, namely that it's a small, light workhorse! (...and may eat into 100-400mm sales with less profit if it competes/betters it at 400mm and with IS)

EOS-M / Re: Tamron for EF M now official
« on: June 22, 2014, 12:36:05 PM »
Aha... Here's what I was wondering about!

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Canon EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM
« on: June 18, 2014, 09:34:49 PM »
Is the STM design, whilst having obvious benefits over other non-STM lenses, still somewhat inferior to L-standard USM engineering? Is 'STM' not branding we're ever to expect to see on an L Lens? Just curious, I'm not too educated on this front... though I'm sure my 400/5.6L's 2-decade old USM design is as smooth and silent as my two EF-M STM lenses!

They're a fairly large company, these Canon folk, I bet they have at least 5 or 6 employees, whether we've met them or not. One of them might even try out the cameras before they market them around the world...

I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve anymore, expat, but we can tell you Canon have no employees and the first person to pick up a 7D2 from Walmart is the first person ever to shoot one, if it makes you feel better? ;)

Ha, snap, Don!... You beat me to it ;)

I really don't think... er, sheesh.

A guy gets a job. He shoots pictures with the camera he's told to because that's what the job is. I don't think he's told to do another guys job, such as shooting press photography, because his job is to use the new camera and try and take pretty pictures with it for his boss who made the camera, not pictures for the press... it makes sense in my head. Am I saying it wrong?

Evidently, some of you guys are making assumptions about the purpose of the 7D2 being there... Considering Canon are going to have a frick-tonne of 7D2s to shift in a coupla' months time, don't you think there's a possibility that they're handing people the camera to take pictures WITH it? Or perhaps they want to TEST the camera under such conditions ooor have some project requiring higher res images that simple printed or web hosted media don't necessitate and can't be captured by the 1Dx, if this is a High MP Camera.
Testing cameras and generating promotional materials and a buzz for a new camera does not require the use of an old camera - maaaybe, just maybe, nobody's there to sell 7D2 captured shots via Getty ;)

If it was going to be used, then look at low rank teams in the first pool matches. There certainly won't be any working pro's using it in the final.

If it kicks ass there will be.

If their Professional Assignment is to capture delightful images to be used by Canon to promote the 7D2 of the 22 men running up and down a field in colourful shirts, on Cup Final Day, I'm pretty sure they'll get in trouble for leaving their 7D2 at home ;)

Sounding interesting...   But why is it a III ?  what happened to I & II ???

It's Tamron's naming convention for FF, Crop and MILCs; Di I, Di II and Di III, respectively ;)

Maybe they're just waiting 'til the final to send a Canon employee out there to capture some "look what the 7D2 captured at the World Cup Final!" Promo shots, because it's not worth wasting press pass opportunities on a 1.6x crop at this point?.. ;)

EOS Bodies / Re: More EOS 7D Mark II Talk [CR1]
« on: June 17, 2014, 06:29:14 AM »
What are those funny 1 series looking bodies at the world cup where instead of regular black prism hump on top, the front part is like shiny white/yellow, almost like some sort of mini-flash integrated into the hump? (Or more likely some guy, for some reason, just using reflective, bright tape on the front of each of the humps on his two bodies  ;D BUT why would someone do that, normally they try to take out bright, not add bright and reflective, if anything, so might it actually be some new body??? I wouldn't have thought a 7D2 in a full on 1 series integrated grip body though, one of the pair of guys who were using the pair of weird shiny hump 1 series was also shooting something small that looked like a 7D, maybe the new one is 1DX2 or 2D with integrated mini flash in hump? OR, most likely just some guys taping their names in shiny fluorescent yellow tape on the top  ;D, just couldn't get a clear look from the video feeds).
Have screencaps but don't think it's worth bothering to upload and post.

That's tape ;) I figured for hire/ID related purposes, maybe?... but YES! There are photographers with non-gripped bodies with larger viewfinders and markings where the 5D3's 'Mark III' badge resides - and I do recall struggling to see a mode dial. These were being shot by people also wielding 1Dx looking bodies - would Sports Pros shoot something as slow as the 5D3? These bodies were equipped with much shorter lenses...

My retina is curved. My eyeballs do not contain multiple elements. IF flat sensors were "simpler" to design for, I am quite disappointed that we have not evolved that superior level yet!

Dude, you only ever use the central focus point and never pay enough attention to the detail in the outer edges of your focal plane to even comprehend its IQ anyways - always recomposing to focus better, you humans! That and our eyes are lame compared to many others in the Animal Kingdom... Diddums ;)

Lenses / Re: What was your first L lens?
« on: June 06, 2014, 03:45:19 PM »
400mm f/5.6L... She's so slim, lightweight, on the ball and fast to get me what I want, treats me incredibly well!

Pages: [1] 2 3 4