September 18, 2014, 09:49:54 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kaihp

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 20
1
That body should be called 1DXs, not 1Ds X - after all, it will have pixels INXS!  ;D

2
Lenses / Re: Which Tilt/Shift lens to choose?
« on: September 17, 2014, 03:35:28 PM »
@NancyP:
As I said in the first post, it's the selective focus I want to work with, so I'm leaning towards the longer focal length end (90mm). The only thing going against this is that I don't have a studio, so space is limited ... which means that 90mm could be too long  :(

Thanks for the idea about the MF lens, but since I've never used anything bigger than 35mm film, this is not an option to me.

@Mackgyver:
I'm not sure if lack of ND and CPL is a problem for me, but it's worthwhile to remember. I already have 82mm ND & CPL, so this is in favour of the 24L II.
Thanks for pointing out the Vince LaForet videos, they are quite good. I just went back and re-watched Episode 3.

3
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: CF Cards Vs SD Cards
« on: September 17, 2014, 03:07:49 PM »
This is all very interesting. I have only cameras with SD cards, and I always did low level format in the camera, every time. Performance of these cards has stayed stable with time. CF, if faster, merits a look. Any comments on a good card reader? I have a MacBookPro with a SD slot built in, so I have not used a card reader before.

I have the Lexar Professional USB3.0 Dual-Slot Reader (it takes both CF & SD) and I am extremely happy with it. It can do sustained 90-100MB/sec downloads from a Lexar 1000x 32GB card to the local SSD drive (Samsung 840 Evo). At USD35 @ B&H, it's pretty inexpensive too.

Depending on which MBP you have, it may or may not have USB3. If it doesn't, consider looking for a Thunderbolt based reader.

4
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: CF Cards Vs SD Cards
« on: September 17, 2014, 09:41:54 AM »
Just remember that the card itself is only half the story.  The other half is the camera.  For example, you can put as fast an SD card as you want into the 5DIII, but it isn't going to write faster than 20 MB/s.  Shooting JPEG on the 5DIII, you'll be limited to less than 50 MB/s.  The camera becomes the limitation in both these scenarios. 

http://robgalbraith.com/camera_wb_multi_page7de5.html?cid=6007-12452

And 18MB/s if you write JPGs to the SD slot.

As for bent pins, I haven't experienced that in 10 years of using CF cards, but my stepmom recently bent several pins on an poorly designed* card reader.

*) Poorly designed because the pins aren't recessed enough in the body, so it is easy to mis-align the CF card when inserting it. At least it wasn't her camera body :)

IMO: I'd stay with the SD cards you have now, and evaluate if I needed to move to CF cards later for speed.

Edit: spelling

5
Lenses / Re: how to get 300 2.8
« on: September 17, 2014, 09:35:31 AM »
My GAS status is now up-north. This could be the last purchase for 2014  :)

Famous last words, or just because you'll buy it on Dec 31st? :D

6
Lenses / Re: how to get 300 2.8
« on: September 17, 2014, 08:17:37 AM »
my ruthless annoying complaining has finally worn the boss (my wife) down and I have been given permission to seek the 300 2.8.  But how to obtain such nirvana.

1)300 2.8 L IS II…just kidding you didn't really think I could do that did you?
2)300 2.8 L IS I…seems like it can be purchased for around 3500 depending upon from where/condition etc
3)Sigma 120-300 sport (around 3500 again)

The main differences from my experience is that the MkII is lighter and has better IS. It is slated to take the 2xx MkIII TC better, focus slightly faster and be slightly optically sharper than the MkI, but I didn't notice that.
I guess you already checked out Bryan's review on TDP.

Considering that the MkII is about 2x the price of a well-kept MkI (at least where I am), you need very (very) good reasons to go for the MkII.

The 300's are quite handholdable at 2,35-2,55kg, even with the 2x TC, whereas the Sigma 120-300mm is 3,4kgs.

7
Lenses / Re: Choose your Weapon: Ultra Wide Zooms for Canon
« on: September 17, 2014, 05:49:03 AM »
I have the 17-40/4L, but I'm lusting for the 16-35/4L IS.

Yes, I'm a geek and I have GAS.  ;D

8
Lenses / Re: The Sigma 35mm Art is Toasting Canon's?
« on: September 17, 2014, 05:43:21 AM »
The optical performance is really good, but several people have reported about AF consistency issues here, even after going through 2-3-4 copies of the 35A and 50A lenses.

The amount of issues have at been enough to at least discourage myself from looking further into getting a 50A at the moment.

9
Lenses / Re: Which Tilt/Shift lens to choose?
« on: September 16, 2014, 09:38:16 AM »
Thanks for all the comments, I really appreciate the collective knowledge and wisdom here.

Keep in mind when making that decision that ably the newer MkII 17mm & 24mm are in fact 'L' Lenses, the older build 45 & 90 are not.

There are differences between the two, there's an expectation that quite soon Canon will upgrade the 45 & 90, so you may want to hold on your decision for a while, but with Canon lately you may also want to ignore that & decide which of the current 17 & 24 suits your needs best.
Indeed. I stopped waiting for the 7D2 two years ago and bought the 5D3, as an example. But the point about the independent rotation of tilt & shift is duly noted.

I would recommend the MII 24mm, both 24mm are L's but the MkII is considerably better both in IQ and functionality.

It will give you more "selective focus" control than the 17, it takes standard sized filters, with a 2XTC it will go to 48mm so you get even more selective focus.

The 45mm is a comparative dog, it desperately needs upgrading.

Hmmm. Using TDP's ISO charts to compare a 24mm L II + 2x TC with the 45mm, and there the 24mm+2xTC are quite soft in the center (even when comparing f/7.1 vs f/2.8 ). Stopping the 45mm down to f/5.6 or f/8 makes it sharper all around.
What am I missing here?

The 90mm blows the 45mm out of the water, optically. Especially if you put the 2x TC on the 45mm, it gets horrible.

As for the price, the 45mm and 90mm are in the 5.000-6.100DKK range (USD870-1.060), whereas the 24L MkII is 9.500DKK (USD1.650).

Since noone have objected to my statement about 17mm & 24mm = architecture and 90mm = product shots, I presume this is right. I guess the addition is now "45mm = The Dog, avoid it at all cost" ;D

10
Lenses / Which Tilt/Shift lens to choose?
« on: September 15, 2014, 06:00:37 PM »
I've been looking at the tilt/shift lenses for some time, and the ability to change the focus wedge is appealing to my geeky side. As usual, googling for which tilt/shift lenses are used for what, is just as futile as trying to drink from a firehose :(

I guess that the 17mm and 24mm are primarily used for architecture and landscape work, and the 90mm for products (and that miniature effect). But what about the 45mm?

Since I am mostly thinking to use selective focus (tilt), I presume that the 45mm and 90mm are more obvious tools. However, since I already have the 1.4x and 2x (MkIII) extenders in, one option could be to use an extender with the 24mm, allowing me to dabble in architectual shots as well..

Looking at the local 2nd hand market, it seems that there are a bunch of 24mm, 45mm, and 90mm available for reasonable cost, but which focal length would be the obvious choice?

I have zooms in the similar focal length areas, but no primes yet. I'm (also) tempted to get the 100mm L-macro too, but that's a seperate topic.

Edit: I'm shooting on a FF camera (5D3).

11
1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:05:17 PM »
I will say now, after having shot a soccer match tonight, that the 400 f/2.8L II IS auto focuses MUCH faster than my version 1 I had.  I had 615 razor sharp photos, which is way too many but that was not even possible with my version 1.  Well worth the cost in my opinion.  Great shots to all who have posted here and I plan to keep contributing.  Thanks.

That's interesting, and good to know.   Do you think it's the same with the 300 2.8IS and 2.8ISii?  I sometimes think my 300 2.8IS isn't as fast to AF as my 70-200 2.8ii.

Agree this is interesting, as I haven't read/heard this before (I mainly go to TDP for reviews).

As for the 300mm MkI and MkII lenses, I did not notice any major differences in AF speed on my 5D3 when I tested them back to back a couple of weeks back. Since MkI lens left my home together with it's new (and happy) owner earlier today, I am no longer able to do an actual test for you, sorry.

12
Software & Accessories / Re: Western Digital My PassPort Wireless
« on: September 10, 2014, 04:02:26 PM »
I occasionally read posts from users wanting portable storage to take into the field with them.  This device seems to answer some of their requirements without costing a fortune.
Well spotted, Mt Spokane! I did see the product name, but never noticed that it had built-in battery and SD reader :)

I wonder if I could put Eye-FI cards in the5D3 and use this to connect to the WD drive. That might actually give a purpose to it's SD slot :D

13
Software & Accessories / Re: Reikan FoCal Testing Distance and Accuracy
« on: September 09, 2014, 09:55:02 AM »
Actuance, did you try to use the "Zoom" mode during Target Setup? I have found that I usually have to engage the Zoom mode to detect the target correctly during the alignment/setup check phase. But once it is setup, I've had no problems in getting FoCal to work.

Ohhh.  So I should set up the target at the recommended distance (50X)
use the zoom function in FoCal for running the target check tool
then zoom out for the AFMA tests?

Yes, that is exactly what I meant.

14
http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/article/6197/digital-cameras-sony-samsung-dominating-digital-camera-market-while-canon-nikon

Sony and Samsung are fortifying a two-superpower structure in the digital camera market in Korea. Traditional market leaders such as Canon, Nikon, and Olympus are losing ground.

The article sounds more like a marketing brief from Sony than a real article.

15
Software & Accessories / Re: Reikan FoCal Testing Distance and Accuracy
« on: September 08, 2014, 05:44:15 PM »
The problem was that using the target checking tool, the software was unable to detect the target.  Well, small wonder because with a 35mm lens at 1.7 meters the A4 target is pretty small... too small in my opinion.  In looking at the figures in the manual, it appeared to me that the camera needs to be closer.

So I moved the camera closer to the target.  The new distance was 0.8 meters.  Ran the target checker and there was no problem.  No problems with any of the tests.

Did I miss-interprete the instructions when I orginally placed my focal plane 1.7 meters (50x FL)?

Actuance, did you try to use the "Zoom" mode during Target Setup? I have found that I usually have to engage the Zoom mode to detect the target correctly during the alignment/setup check phase. But once it is setup, I've had no problems in getting FoCal to work.

Last time I tested a lens, I had an EV just below the recommended 8.0, without getting target detection problems, so a lack of light should not be your problem.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 20