September 02, 2014, 01:50:51 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - drjlo

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 42
1
PowerShot / Re: Review: G1 X MK2 by DPReview
« on: August 31, 2014, 02:47:16 PM »
that the sensor performance is reported to be the same or slightly worse than the G1X sensor is a bit disappointing of course.



It's the usual Canon Sensor story  :'(

Quote from DPReview:

"These examples (and our test scene on the coming pages) suggest that the RX100 II's sensor is so much better than the G1 X II's that it cancels-out much of the dynamic range and high ISO noise advantages that the G1 X II's larger sensor should bring...

Overall, though, the larger sensor in the Canon is much of the reason that the camera is so much less pocketable than the Sony, yet the full benefits of that additional sensor size are not realized: the Canon's image quality advantage isn't proportionate with its greater bulk." 

2
Theater, Concert and Event / Re: Nightclub photography shots
« on: August 31, 2014, 02:33:23 PM »
Canon S95

IMG_0661 by drjlo1, on Flickr

3
Lenses / Re: Canon MP-E 65 f/2.8
« on: August 30, 2014, 04:34:28 PM »
MP-E 65 is a beast of a lens.  Having no focus ring and having to move the camera back and forth to focus takes some getting used to, not to mention the extreme stability needed at high magnification. 

Frankly, I find my Canon 100L like 10x easier to use, so I end up using the 100L with an extension tube to boost the magnification beyond 1:1 a bit.  Still, if one loves a challenge..

IMG_8805 by drjlo1, on Flickr

Salt grains

Salt 5x by drjlo1, on Flickr

4
Photography Technique / Re: Is RAW worth it?
« on: August 25, 2014, 08:36:40 PM »
I only shoot RAW for all the reasons enumerated before, and I will add that it's even MORE imperative to shoot RAW on smaller-sensor cameras such as Canon S95..S120, G series, etc because the inherently worse high ISO noise, less robust metering and AWB means much higher chance of saving photo's with RAW.   

5
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: Laptop Editing - Best Setup
« on: August 24, 2014, 01:27:08 AM »

Are you sure about that on all systems? I think that is how it used to work.

I personally believe that depending on what card you have and what system you have it does switch automatically.

I know mine does.

Nvidia Optimus, as it comes, does switch automatically, but one can go into Nvidia control panel and select to use the Nvidia card for each particular program. 
I have tried this with Photoshop in past, and unless one is doing 3D rendering, Nvidia card does not speed things up for usual 2D photo editing.  Using the Nvidia card does make the laptop run hotter, resulting in the fan kicking in faster and louder  :'(

6
EOS Bodies / Re: Are These The EOS 7D Mark II Specifications?
« on: August 23, 2014, 04:38:44 PM »
...but I do think Canon should have demonstrated that they are still capable of competing on the sensor IQ front.

 Still...it'll suck, if the 7D II really doesn't hit with a better sensor, to have to wait ANOTHER couple years to see if Canon is going to do something on the sensor front. :(

Hate to say it, but "couple years" may be being too optimistic seeing how Canon obvious does not read or care about  Canon Rumors  :'(

7
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: Laptop Editing - Best Setup
« on: August 13, 2014, 08:12:59 PM »
Oh, and Photography only.  No video, or plans to go that direction.

Any thoughts?  Thanks in advance.

I would not get a high end gaming laptop for photo editing, since a lot of your money will go towards a nice video card for gaming, which is not all that relevant for photo editing.  My laptop has the Intel video card AND an Nvidia card, and even using Photoshop 6 with 36 GB RAW files, the graphic card doesn't even kick in (Nvidia Optimus function). 

Also 15.6" screen is just not close to being adequate for photo editing.  I bought the Dell 17R SE 17.2" laptop with "full HD (1920x1080)" screen, then installed a Sandisk Extreme II 480  GB SSD.  This was the best 17.2" screen I could find that covers essentially all of sRGB color space.  There is an extra hard drive bay for a second drive if you want.  This setup is lightening fast for photo editing with very fast Windows startup times. 

8
Reviews / Re: Tony Northrup - D810 vs. 5D Mk3
« on: August 08, 2014, 04:18:41 PM »
If i had to start over today, i'd go with d810 over the older 5d3.  But i don't want to go through the hassel of selling all my lenses so i'll wait to see how Canon responds.  Competition is great for all us consumers and Canon could use a hard kick in the butt like this to start stepping up.

This is probably how most people feel about D810, myself included.  If I did night photography for a living or printed huge landscapes, I might actually switch from 5D III to D810, but otherwise, there really is no pressing need to switch, given how I still prefer the Canon lens lineup and own many. 

9
A very detailed, thoughtful review of the interesting Pentax 645Z, with comparisons to Nikon D810 even and a serious effort to look into video capabilities.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oT-fnHHTFs


10
Canon General / Re: What do you Cheap Out On?
« on: July 29, 2014, 01:10:56 AM »
Long ago, I used a Salt container, Pringles container, and a milk jug.  I now have more expensive versions but less fun.

Cheap DIY Light Modifiers by drjlo1, on Flickr

11
Lenses / Re: How many years before we see a 50L II
« on: July 26, 2014, 03:11:12 PM »
It's actually the field of curvature and is especially prominent at close distances from about f/2.8 to f/4.5.  The lens will back-focus and there is pretty much nothing you can do about it.

What, people use the 50L at narrower than f/1.8 or so ??  ;)

12
Lenses / Re: Selling my two Zeiss lenses. Your advice?
« on: July 26, 2014, 03:05:49 PM »
Canon... has very similar qualities and has autofocus, is lighter and cheaper.

That is exactly how I feel about Zeiss lenses I've had in the past.  They are sturdy and cool-looking, but they don't do anything Canon lenses can't do (and Sigma it turns out), and they are heavy, expensive, and lack auto-focus  :-\

13
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: A7r Arrived - Meeting New Buddies
« on: July 16, 2014, 08:24:07 PM »

I definitely had to learn this the hard way even though it was something I fully suspected prior to ordering. Lol.

Anyhow, based on my very brief experiences so far, I'm finding that the only thing I really enjoy about this thing is the manual focus aids. Quite honestly, I wonder how much more I would like the xt1 if it were possible to mount EF lenses and maintain aperture control.

Funny thing is as soon as I returned my A7R, I installed Magic Lantern for the first time on my 5D III, including the manual focus aids.  I don't understand why Canon doesn't provide focus peaking, etc, in stock firmware  :o

Looking back, what I really enjoyed about my Sony experience was the FE 55mm f/1.8 lens.  Oh, that was a sweet lens; Wish Canon had a 50 mm at that price with comparable color, contrast, sharpness, bokeh, and AF accuracy.  Its compact size was fantastic, too, but I guess Canon's version cannot be as small due to the mirror box  :'(

14
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: A7r Arrived - Meeting New Buddies
« on: July 16, 2014, 06:41:01 PM »

-IQ is not noticeably better than my other rigs as some would have you believe.
-The DR madness has yet to make a difference in any of my first 100 shots. I did however deliberately under and over expose a few shots to see how flexible the files would be in post (they were very clean and resolved a lot of detail). This however doesn't really translate into better photos as it was only a real tangible benefit when I deliberately used the wrong exposure for my shots. Time will tell if I actually enjoy having the extra DR as much as I hoped.


Yup, these are things one cannot convince oneself without first-hand experience.

I, too, remember taking an underexposed shot from A7R, pushing the shadows up more than I ever do, feeling impressed and giddy.  However, this was totally useless in my normal shooting with competent exposure.  Same thing with 36 MP resolution; it's neat to zoom into little hairs and such, but it didn't improve my photography at all. 

15
THE Most important information seems missing:  improved AF speed with the Mk IV adapter? 

This is disappointing as well:
"A third party zoom lens may need to be registered with the Smart Adapter first in order to detect its maximum aperture. Autofocus is disabled for most third-party lenses.
Only Canon-branded lenses introduced in or after 2006 are officially supported. Autofocus may be disabled for older Canon lenses and most third-party lenses, including most Sigma, Tamron and Tokina lenses and all Contax N lenses modified by Conurus."

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 42