1
EOS Bodies / Re: Is This the EOS 3D?
« on: June 17, 2013, 06:03:51 PM »
This can be two things: either a piece of awesome news, or just convincing "photomanipulation."
June 19, 2013, 03:23:00 AM
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
EOS Bodies / Re: Patents: New 50mm, 85mm & 135mm Lenses
« on: June 14, 2013, 11:22:58 AM »
These have been due for a while now, it's about time!
3
EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS
« on: June 14, 2013, 11:22:31 AM »
So this could possibly turn into an actual product within a year?
4
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III & RAW Video, A Case Study
« on: May 30, 2013, 02:50:30 PM »
The ML raw is significantly sharper! Those guys are brilliant.
5
Lenses / Re: DXO tests the Canon 500 II and 600 II lenses
« on: May 30, 2013, 02:44:53 PM »
I still feel like DxO's tests are geared more toward Nikon stuff.
They have good information, though.
They have good information, though.
6
Lenses / Re: When is the New 100-400 Coming?
« on: May 16, 2013, 11:10:45 PM »
Canon would make a lot of money if the 100-400 were to be released alongside the 7D Mark II.
So either both will be released in July, or in 2014...
So either both will be released in July, or in 2014...
7
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 70D & EOS 7D Mark II
« on: May 16, 2013, 11:09:11 PM »
Really hoping the "surprise" will be the 7D Mark II or something even better!
8
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Announcement in the Summer? [CR2]
« on: May 16, 2013, 11:08:04 PM »
How far can Canon go with the EOS-M?
Let's see what more they can do.
Let's see what more they can do.
9
Lenses / Re: Andy Rouse Reviews the EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x
« on: May 16, 2013, 11:04:25 PM »
Brilliant review! I'm surprised he didn't have any cons about the lens!
10
Video & Movie / Re: Canon Creates Video Camera X-Series Look Picture Style
« on: May 16, 2013, 10:42:52 PM »
There's definitely a difference in video with a big dynamic range.
I guess there's no harm in giving it a try.
I guess there's no harm in giving it a try.
11
Canon General / Re: Announcement: Canon EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x
« on: May 16, 2013, 10:39:42 PM »
At first this didn't seem like it was worth the price tag (compared to other lenses with a similar price), but maybe it really is. Improvement are welcome--within the next few years, that is.
12
Lenses / Re: New Tilt-Shift Lenses in the Wild [CR2]
« on: May 02, 2013, 06:58:09 AM »
Macro tilt-shift? I wonder what kind of blur that would have.
13
Lenses / Re: EF 100-400 Replacement in 2013? [CR2]
« on: April 29, 2013, 05:25:25 PM »
The "date" for this aligns well with the 7D Mark II one. [CR2] is a good sign, but there's always that small factor of unsureness.
14
Lenses / Re: EF 800mm f/5.6L IS II [CR2]
« on: April 29, 2013, 05:24:12 PM »
Why bother with a new 800mm if there's not much to improve at the moment?
15
Lenses / Re: EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x Release Date [CR1]
« on: April 28, 2013, 05:18:49 AM »
This makes more sense than the past rumor. How long will it be until the [CR2] shows up? Who knows.