4
« on: August 20, 2012, 12:05:57 AM »
So it would have a higher res than the 1Dx and just 2fps less? That is the part I don't get. I think the 7D is due for replacement, and these maybe the specs, but if they are, I don't see it getting here till mid next year. 1DX supply is tight still, eh?
With sensors getting cleaner and cleaner and video becoming more important as a feature, I don't know why Canon hasn't brought back the pellicle mirrors- they even had one in EOS cameras before. Run a modern H sensor with a pellicle. Get your 10FPs easy, video thru the viewfinder. If I were Canon the 1DX would have had a pellicle mirror and 15 fps to augement a 30+MP camera.
But on this topic, if a 7D is about like a 1D mkIII I don't think it is much of a stretch that the 7Dmk II would be like a 1D MKIV. Considering that used MKIIIs are about the price of a new 7D and MkIVs are about $3000-$3500k, that would indicate to me that the 7DMkII ( which would be about $2500?) is a bit off in the future. Not that Canon uses that as a measure or metric, just that it seems like these things equilibrate in the market. As more people dump MKIVs for 1DXs and the price drops a bit, the 7DMKII will appear. Call is 'Spooky action at a distance".
I would expect that we get some kind of signalling at photokina.