April 18, 2014, 11:19:22 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - unxpectederror

Pages: [1]
1
is anyone quite surprised with the results of the 5d2? i just got one in the other week and it focus's better then my T4i which has 9 cross type point...

2
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 6d Reviews
« on: December 02, 2012, 06:34:56 PM »
I love Kai, he is funny as...you know. For a second there i thought his video buddy was dressed up as a priest to help him get in the church lol. The priest looked as skinny as his video guy. All in all its a tough one to add up but for those who had the original 5d which the 5dm2 shared the focus system of, most of the PJ people felt let down by having to use focus recompose all the time. I still can't believe Canon gave it this wimpy focus system...

that was his camera guy dressed as a priest lol it was from a previous episode. :) they are fun to watch sometimes.

3
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS for $749
« on: November 25, 2012, 04:21:44 PM »
awesome price and good company, i bought my 5d mk ii from them for $1499 a few weeks back and have no complaints :)

4
EOS Bodies / Re: More Canon EOS 6D Specs Surface [CR1]
« on: September 11, 2012, 06:23:37 PM »
this camera would make a whole lot more sense if it was aps-c

5
Lenses / Sigma 50-150 2.8 OS vs Canon 70-700 2.8 IS II for crop cameras
« on: August 27, 2012, 08:38:44 PM »
so its been boggling my mind lately as to why there have not been more reviews of the new Sigma 50-150 2.8 OS.. this lens is some serious piece of kit that rivals the image quality of canons flag ship lens that cost more then twice as much.

i think for anyone who uses a crop cameras that this lens is a no brainier over the canon lens especially if you don't need the extra 50mm reach of the canon.

I recently sold my 70-200 2.8 is II and bought both the Sigma 50-150 2.8 OS and the Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS ... both which are fantastic lenses with basically L quality glass. This makes me think that sigma is finally starting to come into its own... it also shows how over priced the canon lenses really are... after selling the canon 70-200 and buying the Sigma lenses i was still left with close to $400 lol.

does anyone else have any other input on this matter?

Pages: [1]