July 24, 2014, 02:20:22 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - miah

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9
1
Nicely done! Can you give us info on body/lens/settings/interval/lapse time?

2
Photography Technique / Re: The definition of insanity
« on: June 25, 2014, 02:55:12 PM »
Thanks for your perspective, guys. My wife is actually exceedingly patient with my photography most of the time, but sometimes it's "her trip too." I get that. I guess I just need to adjust my kit (and frame of mind) for the company I keep, pairing down to the basics when it's not specifically a "photo trip." I'm just so unaccustomed to having a car to cart things around, I went hog-wild on this last trip and threw in the kitchen sink.

Like unfocused, my typical solo travel kit consists of just one body and two lenses, either a 5D3 + 24-105 + 70-300 L or even lighter, a T3i + 15-85 EFs + 70-300 DO. But I have to disagree with him about shooting what everyone else has already shot. First off, it's not like you're "wearing it out;" it may have been shot a million times before, but it's the first time for me, so I still enjoy it.

For example, while on the big island the park service told us there was presently no flowing lava at HI Volcanoes. So, my wife and I embarked on a 10-hour, ankle-deep thrash through a muddy, unmaintained "trail" in the rainforest outside of the national park to look for possible run-off from Pu'U O'o volcano (based on data from the USGS). Goose egg. Gluttons for punishment, we thrashed in again some ten days later through knee-to-sometimes-thigh-deep mud (more rain) for 12 more hours, half of which was in the dark--and lo and behold: LAVA!

Sure, there are plenty of great shots of molten goo to go around, but there's nothing like getting up close and personal with new earth. Really new earth. If this was the only shot I came home with, I was glad to have packed my 5D. Next time, however, I'll only take one lens.  ;)

3
Photography Technique / Re: The definition of insanity
« on: June 25, 2014, 11:42:08 AM »
Lighten up, distant.star, I used this trip as an example, but the same could be said for any of my non-photog family, friends and acquaintances. The point is, nobody wants to wait. Photography, at least good photography, requires patience--something that's often in short supply.

Because I was going to one relatively small island for 3 whole weeks and had the luxury of a rental car, I splurged and took more gear than I normally do when traveling alone on foot, by canoe or by bike. It was to be a break from having to travel so light. I thought I could really take my time to set up and wait for the critters, for the light, for the many photo opportunities that patience usually affords, but it was not to be.

I'm just curious if others have encountered this oil and water metaphor themselves and if so, what's the solution? I'm leaning towards getting a smaller/lighter super zoom for whenever I'm in mixed company and calling it good.

4
Photography Technique / The definition of insanity
« on: June 25, 2014, 10:33:03 AM »
They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome… I don't know how many times I have to be taught the same lesson: photographers and non-photographers are like oil and water.

I just returned from 3 weeks on the big island of Hawaii with my wife. We had a great trip, but I once again schlepped way too much photo gear along thinking I'd have the time and quiet to really focus--pun intended. Instead, I should have left the bulky, heavy, expensive, theft-prone camera pack (replete with 2 bodies, 6 lenses, tripod, filters, timers, flash, etc.) at home, and simply taken my 5D3 and 24-105. Nothing else was really used.

In my experience, when I travel alone or with another photog, there always seems to be time to set-up and shoot, but when I'm with one or more non-photographers, all of that "nonsense" takes too long.

Can anyone relate?

5
Lenses / Re: Value Lens for birding
« on: April 21, 2014, 12:29:57 PM »
I too use the 400 f/5.6 with Kenko 1.4x on my 5D3 for birds. I don't miss IS too much because BIF shooting requires a high shutter speed anyway. In low light I use a tripod/gimbal. This lens is light, small, sharp and the AF is very fast. I especially like the built-in lens hood. I bought mine from Canon through their online store: refurb $900. Recommended.

6
Canon General / Re: Insurance for Camera gear
« on: April 14, 2014, 06:04:00 PM »
Neuro's getting a bit better rate, I'm paying $10.35/1000, but I'm amazed that they write these policies at all. My gear is outside, in the weather and susceptible to spill, hanging on my motorcycle in unlocked panniers, in third-world nations, at night, often unattended. It's like a checklist of risk. Yet in many years of traveling I've only had to lodge one claim for a theft that occurred in Bolivia--so maybe the insurance companies are smarter than I think? State Farm replaced everything, Fed Ex'ed it to my home in the U.S., no deductible, no questions asked--in spite of not having what anyone might consider a serious police report. Amazing. And well worth $10.35/1000.

7
Canon General / Re: Insurance for Camera gear
« on: April 13, 2014, 11:05:22 PM »
You should be able to buy a State Farm Personal Articles Policy as a stand-alone, with no connection to homeowner's or renter's policies. Mine covers 17K with no deductible for $176 annually.

8
Like resale value, we have to keep this "build-quality" issue in perspective. A lens that could take repeated falls off two-story buildings would be great, but not if it requires two sherpas to lug it around for you. For my purposes, traveling solo with minimum kit either on foot or motorbike, durability must be balanced against size and weight. After seeing the images posted on this thread, I'm convinced the Tammy's IQ is more than adequate for my needs. I think we can all agree that the price is an exceptional value. And now with wickidwombat's comparing the build-quality to that of the Canon 100L--a lens I own, love and have carried over hill and dale without a hitch--I'm convinced that the Tammy has the right IQ, AF, size, weight and build-quality to go ahead and place my order. I'll keep it tethered to me, as AlanF and I discussed in this thread, but expect it to last through many a trip.

Thanks to the early adopters who bought this lens and shared their experiences here!

9
Tried out the Black Rapid RS-4 this afternoon. The Tammy is very comfortable hanging from it. As some might know, my 5DIII once fell off the 300mm when it was slung over my shoulder. I'd like to secure the 5DIII to the Black Rapid and also have an extra safety link from the Tammy/camera to the shoulder strap in case the screw comes loose from the Tammy tripod bush. I am thinking now of getting the Black Rapid wrist strap, screwing that into the 5DIII and threading its loop through the shoulder strap that is attached to the lens tripod mount. Has anyone tried something like this or has a better suggestion?

Sorry for the tardy reply, AlanF, but this is the first chance I've had to take photos of my strap set-up. I haven't yet dropped a lens or body, but I came close to dropping my 5D one time when changing lenses from my shoulder strap. So, like you, I prefer a fail-safe.

I prefer the Joby strap to Black Rapid. I like their rubber bushing/style of lock-nut better and I can adjust the length of their strap very quickly with one hand/no buckles. That means I can wear it long enough to hold my camera/lens beside my waist, gun-slinger style for quick action, then quickly suck it up under my arm pit if I want to scramble up a rock without banging the camera into everything.

Both body and lenses-with-collars are equipped with Induro PU-60 base plates for my tripods.

I attach the Joby slider to a Kirk 1" Std Quick Release which attaches to either the camera, for short lenses, or collars, for long lenses. This allows me to quickly doff the strap and attach either the body or lens to my tripod in a heartbeat. I got the idea to use the Kirk SQR from Neuro, and it hasn't let me down yet.

Next, I use an Optek neoprene wrist leash (very soft and comfortable) on my right wrist, making sure to tighten up the toggle. It stays on my wrist all day. I modified the tip of the leash by sewing on a 5/8-inch, male-side, Fastex Side-Release buckle. I then sewed a very short female Fastex buckle to the right-hand strap bracket on the 5D body, using a short length of webbing. Make sure any leash attached to the camera body itself--chest strap or wrist strap--is as short as possible to minimize wind flappage.

This set-up allows me to have both my lens and camera attached to me at all times, together and/or independently. The wrist leash is long enough that I can still get into my backpack, take a drink of water, etc., without unclipping myself from the camera body, as the whole rig hangs at my side from the chest strap. If I want to change lenses while all leashed up? No problem. Lenses with or without a collar? No problem. Quickly jump to a tripod regardless of lens? No problem.

This is the most versatile set-up I've come up with. I don't like hand straps--something you were leaning towards--because they often use up the body's tripod mounting threads where I'd prefer to have a base plate. Too, though they offer some added stability, they're too slow to get in and out of as circumstances change. Finally, you can see in the photos that I keep my collars rotated 90-degrees when dangling the camera/lens from my Joby so I can quickly lift the body by its grip and rest the barrel of the lens on my left hand. Obviously, I have to loosen the collar screw and rotate things right-side up when jumping to a tripod. I find this 90-degree collar tilt also puts the body/lens in the best gun-slinger position for a quick-response shot.

I hope this helps.

10
Forgot to add: all are on a 5D3, ISO 1250, f/8, 1/2000s.

Thanks for posting these, Albi86, just one question: Were all of these shots with the Tammy at 600mm?

11
Miah, I love the first image of the flying ducks ... very beautiful, the ducks seem to pop out of the image ... very nice indeed.

Thanks, Rienzphotoz, the originals look a lot better (of course). I was just glad to shoot my first birds of the year. It's unusually warm here in S Colorado, so they're showing up early. I'll head out again for a walk this morning and see what I find.

Nice. What were the sizes of each before you reduced them (if you did?)?

Thanks, AlanF, I also wanted to ask you how close to the Robin were you? It's a nice shot that shows off the Tammy. My original 5D3 files were cropped as follows:

5D3 native: 5760 x 3840
Mallards: cropped to 1595 x 1063, then reduced to 720 x 480 for posting
Red-Tailed Hawk:  cropped to 1648 x 1098, then reduced to 720 x 480 for posting

Quick PP in Lightroom only, no plug-ins.

12
Yeah, thanks for posting these, AlanF. Very helpful indeed!

I shot these two today, male and female mallard ducks and a female red tailed hawk, using the trusty 400 f/5.6 and 5D3. Both photos are heavily cropped, hence the desire to pick up the Tammy.


13
Let's be honest about this whole resale thing; percentages do not tell the whole story. Even if the Tammie lost 50% of its value on the used market, say after 3 years, that means you had use of a very nice 150-600 zoom for 3 years for less than $535 US! The Tammie is not a Canon 600, but $535 is just 4% of the cost of the Big White. I'm a serious hobbyist, not a pro making any significant amount of income from photography, so the Tammie's quality/value--even when factoring in resale--looks like a no-brainer.

This morning, walking on my property here in Colorado, I spotted 5 bald eagles and 2 red-tailed hawks (not to mention some prairie dogs, a coyote and a slew of mule deer). While I didn't have a camera with me, my 400 f/5.6 would not have been long enough to put a significant number of pixels on target. The Tammie, "compact and light" as it is, would have been the tool I needed to capture one or more of these feathered friends. Hmm, maybe I need to get off the pot and place an order, but I'd still like to see a few more sample pics... Are you hearing me AlanF and Don Haines?  ;)

14
I would love a 300mm f/2.8, but to be honest, i would be slapping on a TC almost all the time, so having a native 600mm lens would be ideal. f/8 is a little slow for what i need (forests at dawn/dusk), but i guess this is where the ISO performance of the 5D III should come in....  hmmmmm....  I am extremely interested in this lens! I guess the 4000 Euro i would save on this lens could go to some awesome trips! ;)

F/8 at dawn or dusk will be unusable for anything other than telephoto landscape photography of very still subjects, on a heavy tripod, with mirror lock...along with the longer shutter speed required.  I shoot often at dusk, sometimes at dawn.  If you're wanting a shutter speed faster than say 1/100 second, then you need radically more light than f/8, or even f/5.6.  If you disagree, then perhaps you're referring to shooting more in the "golden hour" than that transition to the "blue hour".  I'm talking about shooting in the half hour when the sun is below the horizon.  My 6D autofocuses like a champ in this gloom with an f/5.6 lens, as does its noise floor.  But I can't expect to shoot action, even with an f/2 lens...let alone f/8 (or specifically an f/6.3 lens that is closed to f/8, as in the case of the Tamron).

F/8 photography of wildlife, is good for bright daylight, and that's about it...unless the animal is asleep.

Huh? So just what faster-than-f/2 lens are you using with your 6D to successfully shoot wildlife action during the "blue hour?" Surely the slow EF 500 and 600 f/4 primes are out, and by this standard so is the EF 300 and 400 f/2.8. Which begs the question: what oh-so-busy critters in your neck of the woods allow you to crawl up beside them and snap away in the twilight with your 50mm f/1.4?

15
Thanks, AlanF, all that's really helpful. Question: How does the overall fit and finish feel? I don't own any Tamron lenses, so other than reading reviews I don't know whether the lens feels solid or like junk. Those are extremes, of course, but I'd like your take on how well this thing might hold up with heavy use out in the field. And will the Tammie, as you originally hoped, become your travel lens of choice?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9