Show Posts
1
Lenses / Re: Tokina 16-28 PRO FX or Canon 16-35 L II or....
« on: April 26, 2013, 02:33:09 AM »
i have owned both lens at one point. the tokina is sharp with lesser distortion compared to the 16-35mm..only major difference aside from the price is the ability of the kens to take in filters.if you are an avid fan of filters, canon is the way to go...if not, you can save a lot of money with tokina. tokina has a bulbous end...may be prone for damage...the focal range is another factor...u have to consider that as well depending on your preferred length.
personally, i just sold them all up, went with a single lens of 24-70ii as it covers also my landscape reqts at the moment plus all other shooting...if i need an uwa in the future, ill maybe put off and wait for the 14-24 from canon...if there will be such a lens
it can be too easy for anybody of us to enter the lens hoarding syndrome...and i have been there...luckily i was able to pull out from it and sold my other lenses at a good price before i had gotten lost. just a thought
personally, i just sold them all up, went with a single lens of 24-70ii as it covers also my landscape reqts at the moment plus all other shooting...if i need an uwa in the future, ill maybe put off and wait for the 14-24 from canon...if there will be such a lens
it can be too easy for anybody of us to enter the lens hoarding syndrome...and i have been there...luckily i was able to pull out from it and sold my other lenses at a good price before i had gotten lost. just a thought