Oh, sure. Look...here's this great photo of the Western Greebe's courtship ritual taken with the A1400. The birds are those two tiny, dark specks there. What a great photo.
A great shot is a great shot. Weither its from an a1400 or a 1Dx. It's more convienent to get the shot with a 1Dx but If you got it with a a1400, both would be great shots. That's the principle and has nothing to do with equipment.
A great photo is a great photo. It's irrelevant what equipment was used.
Basic failure of logic. A great photo can be taken with any camera, but it does not follow that every great photo can be taken with any camera.
No one is contesting the former, the latter assumption is where you're incorrect.
But just because the great photo would be different from the a1400 than the 1Dx makes it no less great.
IE: great wide angle shot of a landscape is no less great than a tele-compressed photo landscape, which could also be just as good.
The photographer chooses the shot. For some shots, 'any camera' just won't do.
It's obvious you're practicing reductio ad absurdum - and you're doing a great job of sounding absurd in the process. Feel free to keep on baiting, I've fed you enough troll food in this thread.
More like look, a close up wide shot of the western gebes courtship and here's another of them tele compressed.
Which one is better? Neither, they're both good. That's were I disagree, one shot was easier to get and the other was extremely difficult but the end product is the same.
Ramon, you're one of the good guys here, always contributing. But the last week or so it feels like you've chewed of the sour end of something. I normally like your comments, the knowledge and insight you share. Please come back.