1
Lenses / Re: Canon 200-400mm review
« on: May 22, 2013, 01:11:09 AM »
Nice pics, thanks for the link.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Image that the 7D2 next year will give you the same 19-point AF with a tiny improvement
True! But you can take screenshots of your account statement and smileOr be like me and watch your savings account grow!
Well, that's no fun - you can't take pictures with a savings account!
If they release it, we can't wait for it anymore.
You know honestly. If Canon only matches the 7100 I would be very happy. If they make it better then I would be in heaven with the new Super tele lenses. Wow... If not?
I have a bud that shoots Nikon super teles with the D4 and the 7100 now. I am going to ask him next time we shoot together if I can shoot some shots with it. So I can process and look at the raw's. I love tack sharp and detailed pics and that camera looks to be what I am after. For birding.
The D7100 won't be a match for the 7D II, not even close. As I've always said, IQ is about more than just the sensor.
I shot all my primes wide open and got tack sharp images in many situations with my 7D. I can't complain at all, it's AF system fulfilled all my needs and did so elegantly. It's not as good as the mk3 but the 7D AF was plenty for my needs. I think the center point on the 7D is a double cross type just like the MK3. Not sure but I think I read it somewhere.
It is double cross too but there is a lot more to a point than whether it is single, double or double cross. 5D3 non-cross points sure lock a lot better and faster than the non-cross in the 5D2 and the center double on the 5D3 has ultra-precision mode when used with some lenses and that really makes a difference.