January 31, 2015, 05:17:15 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cid

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 21
16
Landscape / Re: Mountains, Lakes and Rivers
« on: November 02, 2014, 03:59:12 PM »
...

I like it. The ice skein seems natural enough to me, a light overlay to the water. It may be that the foreground is a bit too prominent and detracts from the mountains which I suppose to be the primary feature. However, having said that, I do like the picture as it is.

thank you

17
Landscape / Re: Mountains, Lakes and Rivers
« on: November 02, 2014, 02:09:29 PM »
Seems pretty impressive to my relatively untrained eye.  I'd like to see what you started with because the ice seems not quite right but maybe that's just what it looked like in real life??

Jack

what exactly doesn't seem right to you? I did only some saturation + clarity changes, oh and the stones were bit warmed up

18
Landscape / Re: Mountains, Lakes and Rivers
« on: November 02, 2014, 11:25:43 AM »
Let me share my last lake/mountain attempt. It's my first shot where I tried manual exposure blending using luminosity masks + some light brush touches  ::)

above and under the ice by Matej Sokol on 500px

I personally think it's little bit too messy content wise. Please, feel free and share your critique

19
Lenses / Re: missing reviews of 400mm f/4 DO IS II
« on: October 30, 2014, 09:28:13 AM »
There were lot of preproduction reviews of 7D mk II, but I'm really missing some more info about 400 DO II. It looks like a very interesting lens and I couldn't find any other info except introduction and short overview here

Am I missing something? Is it too soon for reviews? Or am I the only one interested in some sample images if not whole reviews?
Same to me. I can only find low res samples from Canon.

It seems that there are not so many copies out there that they could find their way to the reviewers.
Neither on Canon nor on retailer pages I can find any release or delivery date. Everywhere you only can pre-order.
Not that I could afford it, but I am interested in how the DO tech has been developed in the 2nd generation.

exactly, I'm not buying it, maybe in future as my wildlife lens, but right now I'm just curious about progress in DO development

20
Lenses / missing reviews of 400mm f/4 DO IS II
« on: October 30, 2014, 08:34:26 AM »
There were lot of preproduction reviews of 7D mk II, but I'm really missing some more info about 400 DO II. It looks like a very interesting lens and I couldn't find any other info except introduction and short overview here

Am I missing something? Is it too soon for reviews? Or am I the only one interested in some sample images if not whole reviews?

21
Landscape / Re: Hoya Polarisationsfilter for Landscapes.
« on: October 15, 2014, 03:43:15 PM »
There are also much easier to clean.  Fingerprints wipe off very easily.  Within the Hoya line, I highly recommend the HD filters.

This is very interesting. I've got two of the Hoya Pro1 Digital filters and have noticed they are a massive challenge to get clean. I just end moving the oily smear around the glass and never really get rid of it. I always thought it was just my lens cloths or my technique. Good to know.

same here, it was PITA to clean the Hoya UV Pro 1  >:(

in my opinion, I think that B+W nano coated filters were the easiest to clean

22
Lenses / Re: Polarizer
« on: October 09, 2014, 05:15:53 PM »
A more expensive alternative is the B+W XS-Pro MRC Nano, but I do not know what the extra dollars are providing.
The extra dollars get you the Nano coating (tougher outer layer), brass instead of aluminum, and a slightly thinner filter (4mm vs. 5mm).
indeed those are some very fine filters, if you have money and want quality stuff, then don't hesitate and go for it ;)

23
Lenses / Re: wide angle needed
« on: September 30, 2014, 03:42:32 PM »
16-35 f4 is definitely what you want. Canon did an excellent job on that one.
indeed, already checking where to buy the lens  ;)

What about EF 16-35mm f/4L?
Or EF 20mm f/2.8?
Or EF 17-40mm f/4L?


all of them were already suggested, but anyway, thank you

24
Lenses / Re: wide angle needed
« on: September 18, 2014, 04:56:32 PM »
I don't think you can go wrong with the 16-35 f/4 IS.  Along with the 24-70 f/2.8 II and 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, I think these are the most amazing zooms on the market.
don't forget 200-400  ;)

I can just add to what Macguyver is saying. I have the Zeiss 15mm and 21mm and they are both phenomenal lens, especially the 15mm, which I totally fell in love with it this summer. But the 16-35 f4L IS is a lot more versatile and the IQ is very impressive. Be also aware that the Zeiss 15mm has a 95mm filter size, so filters are not exactly cheap.

for me, the main problem, there is no way right now how to test Zeiss 15, it could be excellent lens, but I don't like the idea of buying lens for 2,5k euro before trying it

25
Lenses / Re: wide angle needed
« on: September 18, 2014, 02:36:21 PM »
Soo I had the opportunity to try both Zeiss 18mm and Canon 16-35 f/4 and they are both great

Zeiss
+build quality, the feel when focussing, compact, weight

Canon
+wider, more coverage, no extending while zooming, price

too bad I couldn't try Zeiss 15

I really loved the look and feel of Zeiss, but Canon will be probably smarter and more versatile choice

26
Lenses / Re: Best filter for 50mm 1.8 original
« on: September 18, 2014, 02:30:20 PM »
If you want the best then B+W mrc nano uv or clear in correct diameter is the right for you

UV is useful when you plan to use film camera too

First I used Hoya filters, but I personally think they are much harder to clean, what can cause some scratches while doing so

27
Lenses / Re: Canon Reveals Details for future Telephoto Lens Line
« on: September 16, 2014, 04:04:25 PM »
the DO design looks very nice, even MTF of new 400 looks great, but I'll wait for some reviews to see what do they have to show us really, I'm not being sceptical about this but want to see some pics first :)

And I hope when the stuff is real and there will be more lenses with DO design the green ring will be replaced with the proper one - red  8)

28
Lenses / Re: Best filter for 50mm 1.8 original
« on: September 16, 2014, 03:57:23 PM »
Lately I purchased a 50 1.8 original in mint condition for my wife. She loves the lens but we need to get a protective filter so we can "keep" it mint but not sure what the best is for that lens. I prefer b+w filters but am open to suggestions though. Thanks

the question is if you are willing to invest in quality filter that is almost the price of the lens to keep it in mint condition?

or you want just some cheapo, which could be degrading the image quality...

29
Lenses / Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
« on: September 16, 2014, 03:49:57 PM »
if it's true then I'm eagerly waiting for announcement and reviews while keeping money for it aside  :)

30
Software & Accessories / Re: How do you carry your tripod around?
« on: September 16, 2014, 06:50:28 AM »
not sure if I can help you with your choices, but

  • not sure what you mean by not hardcore hiking, but my advice is to spend more on quality bag that's comfortable and can hold all your photography gear, has good weather resistance (and even then I recommend some rain cover for it), is comfortable to carry and can hold some additional things you may need while hiking like jacket, some med kit, and misc stuff
  • while it sould be comfortable, then I highly recommend to try backpack before buying it if it fits your back

I personally use Deuter Guide 45L, it's not dedicated photo bag, but I carry there in cases 5D mk III, 24-70 mk II and 70-200 mk II with no problem. I'm even able to add sleeping bag, some spare clothes, food + water for about day and half and can easily attach tripod on side (on the other side goes tent).  Making it total weight about 15-17kg for 3-4 day trip.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 21