October 24, 2014, 02:09:52 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - neuroanatomist

Pages: 1 ... 486 487 [488] 489 490 ... 973
7306
Set high prices for lenses, lose sales to competitors, profits go down, what a surprise.

NOT.

Well, thanks for that uninformed opinion.  Did you actually read the linked presentation materials?  Perhaps if you had, you'd have noticed that while Canon lost revenue and profits fell in some business segments, and sales of PowerShot cameras were down, their sales in the dSLR and lens category was actually up 14% in FY12.  Are you surprised now?  ::)

You mean that if Canon sold even more DSLR lenses, it's bottom line wouldn't have improved? That's even more surprising.

It's not surprising at all. Canon is a moderately diversified business, and in particular, the office (copiers) and industrial (lithography) segments are tied tightly to the global economy.

7307
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Canon may be expensive but...
« on: January 31, 2013, 03:18:29 PM »
I have already answer that, go back to page 2, BUT Canon, Leitz , Hasselblad Nikon  etc  has real MTF equipments and measuring of the lenses  , not to be mixed by Photozone and others "MTF" tests .
There is no problem to measure a Canon lens at Hasselblad MTF lab in Gothenburg and compare that to others

I do not see an answer.  Are you saying that the MTF curves published on Canon's (and Nikon's) websites represent real, empirically measured data?

7308
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Canon may be expensive but...
« on: January 31, 2013, 09:27:51 AM »
MTF tests from Nikon, Canon, Leitz, Zeiss , Hasselblad are real MTF tests and of the lens only

Actually, most of those published MTF curves are not real MTF tests, i.e. the manufacturers are not actually measuring the resolution of a real lens.  Canon's and Nikon's published MTF curves are theoretical MTFs (as are Sigma's, Tamron's, etc.) - they are calculated curves, generated by a computer algorithm based on the optical design of the lens.  AFAIK, Zeiss is the only lens manufacturer that published MTF curves that are empirically measured on a real production lens (not sure about Hasselblad). 

Since neither Canon nor Nikon make public their algorithms for generation of theoretical MTF curves from the lens design, it's not really valid to compare them to one another, nor to Zeiss' real measurements.  Comparing within a brand is fine. 

7309
Set high prices for lenses, lose sales to competitors, profits go down, what a surprise.

NOT.

Well, thanks for that uninformed opinion.  Did you actually read the linked presentation materials?  Perhaps if you had, you'd have noticed that while Canon lost revenue and profits fell in some business segments, and sales of PowerShot cameras were down, their sales in the dSLR and lens category was actually up 14% in FY12.  Are you surprised now?  ::)

7310
Personally, I find that a 3-stop and a 10-stop ND cover all my needs.  There are a lot of not-so-good variable ND filters out there, from an IQ standpoint.  The good ones are from Tiffen, Singh-Ray, and Schneider (B+W's parent compant).  I avoid variable NDs because I often want to use an ND with ultrawide lenses, and they're not optimal there (at wide focal lengths, you get a 'Maltese cross' artifact - an 'X' through the image - that gets worse the wider the AoV and the darker the setting).  But at 17mm on APS-C, you'd either not see it at all, or only at the very dark settings of a variND.

7311
Site Information / Re: Forum recommendations
« on: January 30, 2013, 12:05:00 PM »
For the login issue, instead of simply using the username/password boxes in the upper right, use the login link, and you can choose how long to stay logged in, or to always stay logged in.

Thanks - yes, that's where the options is, forgot to mention that, since I so rarely need to log in!

7312
Site Information / Re: Forum recommendations
« on: January 30, 2013, 11:47:26 AM »
When I log in, there's a checkbox to remain logged in - do you not see that?

Personally, I like the 'somebody posted while you were typing' as I find it often avoids me duplicating someone else's response.

In the past, the mods have gone through and reorganized the forums, combining some, splitting out others, ensuring there's only one topic per lens in the lens gallery, etc.  Perhaps some specific suggestions about what you think could be changed would help...

7313
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 1DX ITR AF Feature
« on: January 29, 2013, 11:27:24 AM »
It's face-detection with phase AF.  I find that it works pretty for tracking a person moving through a group.  I have a Servo setting for 'people/events' and I use iTR for that, but not for my wildlife/birds setting.  Note that for iTR to work, you've got to be in 61-point auto selection more for the AF point selection.

7314
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 1Dx Problem
« on: January 28, 2013, 12:40:29 PM »
FWIW, I have no issues with that combo.

7315
Consistent with my other recent experience, the IQ of the 5DIII makes up for the crop factor loss of 1.5 fold as the two centre crops were quite similar. The 7D was noisier, as expected. I usually use it at iso 320 or less. At great length extremes, the 7D does have an advantage but otherwise the FF is just as good for bird photography with the same lenses, and the closer you get to the target, the better it should be. It will be interesting to see when the 7D II comes out with more modern technology if it can overtake the 5DIII in the telephoto range,

^^ This is why I don't use my 7D anymore...  Add to that the case of the 600/4, where the FF 1D X will autofocus with a 2x TC for 1200mm focal length, compared to the 7D which needs f/5.6 for phase AF and therefore is limited to the 1.4x TC and a FF-equivalent of 1344mm - an effective 'crop factor benefit' of only 1.12x. 

7316
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon's Roadmap for 2013 [CR2]
« on: January 27, 2013, 10:38:36 AM »
Right now the sensor is the week part of the chain, but even so the system beats the competition for my needs.

+1

7317
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon's Roadmap for 2013 [CR2]
« on: January 27, 2013, 10:20:07 AM »
The problem is that I can pick up an Olympus E-M5 that beats the iq of any canon APS-c camera and they are supposed to be introducing an even better successor to the E-5 ..... Or I can go Panasonic......or I can go Sony..... Or I can go Nikon.... Canon is now positioned at the bottom of the APS-c world for iq and even micro four thirds is beating it.

From a DxO-minded, sensor-only viewpoint, sure.  But what's the lens selection like over there?  I think you know the answer, as a few posts later, you wish for a 400mm lens.

7318
Lenses / Re: Ultimate giclée lens?
« on: January 26, 2013, 06:03:35 PM »
So, I do a bit of ... reproduction / copy... work...

So, actually you're the photocopy-ist here, shooting flat targets on walls.  Hmmmm....   :P

7319
Canon General / Re: Canon 1dx Portrait orientation exposure problem
« on: January 26, 2013, 05:59:21 PM »
Missed this thread, but that would be my guess - combo of AF point linked spot metering and orientation-linked AF point.

As suggested, try resetting to defaults (write your current settings to a CF card first).

I've not seen this issue, personally.

7320
Also...  My education is in neuroscience, I spent 8 years teaching neuroanatomy to medical students (as well as gross anatomy, histology, etc.).   For many years, my 'day job' was quantitative neuroanatomy - assessing gene expression changes in the brain.

My avatar is a self portrait - a sagittal MRI of me.

Pages: 1 ... 486 487 [488] 489 490 ... 973