March 06, 2015, 02:51:32 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Hillsilly

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 55
Lenses / Re: Help me decide: should I buy an EF 135L
« on: November 24, 2014, 07:01:35 AM »
I love mine, and it has essentially replaced my 70-200.  But in the absence of special uses such as wildlife or sports photography (after all, on a 7D it is essentially an equivalent of a 200mm f/2 in relation to reach and light gathering) it doesn't sound like you'll get a lot of extra benefit from it.  Still, it is a nice lens at a good price....just buy one.

Canon General / Re: Does Canon really deserve this?
« on: November 23, 2014, 07:35:35 AM »
As a Canon user since the mid-1980's, I have a strong attachment to the brand.  Before jumping across to Fuji, I gave Canon a chance and waited for their mirrorless option.  But it just wasn't what I wanted and sadly had to go elsewhere.

I still use Canon DSLRs for some things, but my kit hasn't changed in ages - Canon just haven't made anything that has excited me in a long time.  I think the 40/2.8 is the only Canon lens I've purchased in the last three years, and the new 100-400 is the first serious lens in a long time that I'm likely to buy.  But the only reason I'd consider buying a new body is if a camera breaks and I need to replace it.  Even though my cameras are several years old, for what I shoot, I don't think a new camera would be of any significant improvement.

Apart from some topics I haven't noticed an upsurge in negative comments.  This is still a very friendly, helpful forum.  But I can understand why those with particular interest, needs and desires might be disappointed with Canon's lack of development in some areas. 

EOS Bodies / Re: what is the body you want to see canon release next ?
« on: November 16, 2014, 06:44:24 AM »
I'm pretty happy with things as they are now.  Don't really see the need for any new bodies.

Largely the same as above.  I'll turn it off to remove the card at the end of the day and it will then stay turned off until I need to use it again.

I try to remember to turn it off when changing lenses as I've heard the the sensor is more likely to attract dust with the camera on due to "static electricity" and "charged particles".  Might be an old wives' tale, but sounds feasible.

Canon General / Re: Hello everyone!
« on: November 11, 2014, 10:02:39 AM »
I agree, too.  You should consider compiling some of your posts and turn them into a photography book.

Still shooting film.  Although, I'm shooting less and less each year.  I like the look I'm getting from some of the current films - such as Kodak Portra.  But I struggle to say if there is any benefit to it.  I do it mostly to be a little different.

My main camera is an EOS 3, but I've also got an Elan 7E, 3000 and 1000FN that I pull out of the cupboard on very rare occasions.

If I'm shooting B&W, I develop it myself then scan it.  I've got my own darkroom equipment at home, but I haven't fired it up in over a year (probably longer).

On that point, I'm probably going to put all my darkroom gear on eBay over summer.  If anyone lives near Brisbane, Aus and wants it, I'll happily do a good deal.   There's a LPL C7700MX medium format enlarger (with a Minolta 80mm lens), a Meopta 35mm enlarger (useful for flashing paper etc), a set of contrast filters, timer, chemicals, hundreds of sheets of paper (mostly older RC that is several years old and possibly a lot is unusable, but I'm sure there is some newish 11x14 Foma FB paper), a couple of safelights, various sized trays, tongs, focus checker, toners and other assorted chemicals.  $250 all up on the basis that you take everything.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Recommend first slr
« on: November 10, 2014, 02:16:53 AM »
Thanks everyone for the advice, I am in Aus actually. I think there is a little flexibility in the budget I was leaning towards the 600d with the new kit lens and a 40 2.8

If you shop around you can get some good deals.  CameraPro in Brisbane often have good prices and have a 700D with 18-55mm for $769.  (They also have a Fuji X-E1 with 18-55 for $799 which is an interesting alternative - it is a good camera with a good lens.).

FWIW, I've got a 40mm and love it.  Mine came from the USA.  For most camera items, don't discount the idea of buying from reputable overseas retailers.

Canon General / Re: what's wrong with this shot?
« on: October 31, 2014, 03:35:07 AM »
Blown highlights on the chains due to poor DR performance?

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: So what makes a camera a "pro" camera?
« on: October 21, 2014, 08:00:19 AM »
When elves take photos of children with Santa, they typically use the cheapest Canon DSLRs.  Seeing these elves make up more than half of all the pro photographers in the world (and possibly 90%+ of the higher income ones), does that make their cameras "pro" cameras?

Lenses / Re: Zoom or 135 in Place of 100 and 200?
« on: October 20, 2014, 10:19:10 PM »
For general photography, my 135 largely replaced my 70-200.  It's smaller, lighter, faster, and less conspicuous.  And it is a nice lens - it is sharp, focuses quickly, and has that f/2 aperture.   But the 70-200 still get a workout when I want the extra flexibility of a zoom and the extra reach. 

The 70-200 is probably the smart choice.  But the 135 has enough going for it to make it a valid alternative.

Lenses / Re: Travel gear thoughts...
« on: October 18, 2014, 02:57:53 AM »
I also have bought the pro cube recharge dock from Hahnel, It recharges two Canon batteries and has a 2.1A USB charger on the back.
That's one good looking charger!  I travel with a handful of chargers - camera charger(s), AA/AAA/18650 charger, phone charger, laptop charger, GPS charger.  And then you have all the associated cables.  I'm sure there are better ways to do things.  If you ever get your blog up, I'd be keen to hear how you managed with everything.  There aren't that many sites or blogs that deal with the mechanics of travel photography - memory cards, storage, backups, editing on the road etc.  Yet these seem to be regular topics for discussion on this site.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: How to differentiate crop vs. FF
« on: October 17, 2014, 04:08:29 AM »
I've been hearing some positive murmurings about the 7Dii sensor, which is why I prefaced my comments accordingly.  But,until DxO officially ranks the sensor any comments about about the 7Dii are just wild, unsubstantiated speculation and lack credibility. :)   

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: How to differentiate crop vs. FF
« on: October 16, 2014, 10:42:16 PM »
Perhaps I should read all of the prior six pages (and even some 7Dii reviews), but I suspect we're only having this discussion because Canon crop sensors are lagging a bit.  Consequently, if you know where to look, you can see the differences between sensors.  With other brands, the differences in image quality are smaller and the choice between crop and FF is more about lens selection, camera features, speed and megapixels, high ISO performance, depth of field, and cost.

Its a key consideration in relation to lens selection.  But otherwise, I tend to feel that nobody can reliably tell if an image was taken with a crop sensor or FF sensor.  And apart from the photographer, I doubt if anyone else really cares.   Its just another feature to consider when selecting a camera - important to some, not so much to others.

Lenses / Re: Travel gear thoughts...
« on: October 15, 2014, 04:20:04 AM »
I did something similar for a long time - 17-40mm, 50mm and 70-200.  This combination worked well for me.  Your 16-35 is probably a better lens than my 17-40.  And taking a 70-300 instead of a 70-200 gives you a bit more reach and probably weighs a bit less. 

The only suggestion I'd make is to consider adding a small, wider aperture lens.  They come in useful at night time and when shooting indoors.

But otherwise, the 16-35 and 70-300 combo is fine. Plus you've got to re-start somewhere.

Once you've done a few trips, you'll learn what you like to photograph and will be in a much better position to decide if different lenses are more suited to you.  Perhaps you'll get into wildlife photography in exotic places and need some longer lenses.  Perhaps you'll take more portraits of the locals and want a wider aperture lens. 

FWIW, My travel kit continually evolves.  What I take depends on where I'm going and what I'll be photographing.  My current "Light" kit for when photography isn't going to be a major part of the trip is just taking a 40mm and a 135mm.  But then I'm heading off to Melbourne for a couple of weeks next week and I do intend to take a lot of photos.  I'll probably take a 14mm, 23mm (ok...and X100), 35mm and a 50-230mm and a couple of flashes.   But these are all Fuji lenses are all fairly light and compact and easy to carry.

EOS Bodies / Re: AA Filter: Still Relevant, Marketing Ploy, or Obsolete?
« on: October 12, 2014, 10:52:48 PM »
My Fuji cameras don't have an AA filter and it is part of the reason why their files appear crisper and sharper. But the difference is subtle and can be replicated with Canon cameras in PP.  What can't be fully corrected in PP is Moire, which I have noticed on rare occasions with the Fuji, but is very rare with Canon.  While most PP software feature some form of moire removal / reduction, its never 100% effective.  IMHO, a weak AA filter is probably the best compromise.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 55