November 23, 2014, 11:31:49 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Hillsilly

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 53
EOS Bodies / Re: AE-1 Styled DSLR from Canon?
« on: September 17, 2014, 10:26:08 PM »
I've got two Fuji's - an X100 and an X-E1.  I really like the manual controls and layouts.  But....they are pretty basic cameras compared with the feature sets of most Canon DSLRs.  I doubt Canon can make anything similar without severely crippling the cameras functionality.  And if they do that, what's the point of buying it?

I would have spelt "super sonic" as "supersonic", but otherwise, that's one cool, shiny badge on top.  Any word on price, AF speed or image quality?

EOS Bodies / Re: Official: Canon EOS 7D Mark II
« on: September 16, 2014, 10:15:47 AM »
Four years... for this?
Perhaps you can show us your D300s update and we'll compare them side by side.  Oh...sorry, I forgot.  Nikon don't make DX cameras for sports and wildlife photographers anymore.

EOS Bodies / Re: How can we improve on 5D3 to 5D4?
« on: September 16, 2014, 08:18:55 AM »
It sounds like Canon has developed a nice 1" sensor.  And given their reluctance to upgrade the 100-400mm, I think they should replace the FF sensor with the 1" sensor.  With a crop factor of 2.7x, this means my 70-200 become a very sharp 190-540 and my 135mm becomes a 365/f2 lens.  And one of those new Sigma's becomes a 405-1620mm.

Add in the 7dii's AF system and you've got a pretty formidable sports and wildlife package.

Software & Accessories / Re: How do you carry your tripod around?
« on: September 16, 2014, 07:59:57 AM »
I've got one of the Lowepro 15L Sports bags.  Its the best solution I've found for carrying a tripod.  The bag is very comfortable and I find it ideal for shorter walks.  It lacks a lot of pockets for carrying extra gear, so if you're normally carrying more than a couple of litres of water and a lot of food, it might not be the best answer for you.

Lenses / Re: What telephotos do we own?
« on: September 15, 2014, 07:51:46 AM »
Mine's the cheapest - the 400/5.6.  Its been a good lens, but it's about 20 years old and has a pretty bad fungus problem and is currently unusable.  Just waiting for Canon to bring out a new model (or new 100-400) to replace it.   But then, the new Sigma sounds ok, too.

PowerShot / Re: The New Canon PowerShot G7 X
« on: September 14, 2014, 08:00:34 AM »
I'm not a fan of these things being labled 1" Sensors... I hope everyone considering this thing is aware it's much smaller than an inch and only around 15.9mm measured diagonally!
Camera makers use the "non-standard" inch, where everthing is inflated 1.5x.  The concept gets a surprising amount of real world use.

The D750 sounds nice, but apart from good AF, it seems to lack the ruggedness and speed that most people would expect from a wildlife and sports oriented camera.  But then, apart from the D4s, I'm not sure if any Nikon is really aimed at that market?   

On first glance, the camera sounded interesting, but then it doesn't seem like much of an improvement over a D610 and if you were intending to spend more, wouldn't you just get a D810?

Lenses / Re: The New Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pancake
« on: September 11, 2014, 09:51:58 AM »
Nice!  Good to see Canon showing some EF-S interest.  Wish it was EF, though.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Specifications Confirmed
« on: September 11, 2014, 08:46:56 AM »

now, I'm 99% certain i am not buying another cop body...but...that one makes me smile.  canon should have had an Intervalometer before this so that just makes me smile that it's in this, because it will be in other bodies soon.  this does sound like a nice body though.

Agree 100%+++

Just hope it allows you to keep the shutter open for more than 30s.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: How do you say Nikon
« on: September 11, 2014, 06:14:47 AM »
I use "Nick-on" (which seems confirmed in the video).  But I do notice a lot of people saying "N-icon".

Thanks - it was good to see a lot of positive comments about PicturesToExe (and ".exe" software in general). 

bbdigital - I love your site and slideshows.  If I get more into this, I'm sure I'll pick up some of your templates.

In case anyone is curious about how this went, I spent a few weeks playing with various software.  I really liked ProShow Gold, but the was a major problem - I couldn't get the EXE files to generate with good image quality.   I suspect that it had something to do with my video card (despite being a new computer with a fast processor and lots of RAM, I use a a lower end video card).

I ended up buying PicturetoEXE.  It works very well and does exactly what I needed it to do.  In comparison to ProShowGold, it has less fancy transitions, backgrounds, templates etc built in (but you can create your own - and there seems to be a community sharing these).  It is pretty simple to pick up the basics.  And I've had some fun creating my own keyframes and animations.  All up, it is a good program.

In relation to the transitions, while ProShow Gold does have fancier inbuilt options, my thinking is that judges are more interested in the quality of my images than seeing computer graphics generated from software.  Anyway, we'll see how we go.

Lenses / Re: Input on building a prime lens kit
« on: September 09, 2014, 04:37:58 AM »
With a FF camera, I roll mostly with a 40 / 135 combo.  The 135 stays on the camera most of the time and the 40mm is a pocket-able alternative providing a contrasting perspective.   

For wider angles, I use a 17-40mm.  If I was going to replace it with a prime, I'm not sure what I'd get.  Part of me says the 24mm tilt shift would be ideal (but at a high price).  The new 24mm f/2.8 IS is more budget friendly and is getting great reviews.  But really...24mm just isn't wide enough.  20mm?  Pass.  Perhaps the 14mm?  But that also has a high price.  In my case, I think my realistic choice might be the Samyang 14mm.

With my Fuji camera, I use a 14mm, 35mm and 60mm combo.  (In FF equivalents, that's 21mm, 50mm and 90mm in real lens speak).  These three focal lengths are fine for almost everything I want to photograph.

WE are the only people buying cameras, everyone else is using their phone.  I can't imagine everyone here switching to a mirrorless camera for no compelling reason.  Mirrorless cameras will only outsell DSLRs when they offer comparable (or better) features.  And if they do that, then where is the problem?

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Features seen in the past and absent today
« on: September 07, 2014, 11:25:35 AM »
Those big, black fabric capes that you see on the back of older view cameras would be quite handy to view camera LCDs when in bright sunlight.

Also, an ISO of 6 would be great for taking long exposures.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 53