December 20, 2014, 08:03:24 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Hillsilly

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 54
EOS Bodies / Re: 7D replacement: What is a "fine-detail" sensor
« on: August 28, 2014, 07:30:26 AM »
What about the Sony Mavica?  Released in 1981, it has a more traditional DSLR look.  Some versions even used Canon lenses.

EOS Bodies / Re: Do Sensors Make the Camera?
« on: August 25, 2014, 08:15:46 PM »
1. No idea, sorry.
2. I hear so many positive things about Sigma sensors, that I'm starting to wonder if Sigma cameras produce the best image quality at the affordable end of the spectrum.  But there are so many compromises in using Sigmas that they are on few people's radar.  There's so much more to a camera (and more importantly, a system) then the sensor.
3. While it is fun to have fun with Sonikon users, Nikon cameras do use different processing technologies compared with Sony.  Then there is the camera design and build quality.  They also have a very different feature set, many of which are at least the equal of Canon's.   As with question 2, there is more to a camera than a sensor.

Technical Support / Time Lapse Tools
« on: August 22, 2014, 11:29:29 PM »
There's a new ferry terminal being built outside my office and I thought it would be fun to make a timelapse movie of it.  I'm thinking of taking one photo per day - probably towards sunset. 

But, this will be my first longer term time lapse movie.  So I've got a query.  With sunset times varying each day, are there any easy programs which will help you calculate the exact time of day to take your photo so that (in theory at least) I'd have the same ambient lighting conditions every day?  Or am I overthinking this and should just use a light meter and wait for the right time or should I just take the photo at the same time each day?

Technical Support / Re: Question regarding sensor size and image quality
« on: August 22, 2014, 11:18:55 PM »
With the Arizona Highway's magazine, can you perceive the improved image quality compared to other magazines with lower image standards?  I'm curious how well their requirements translate to a magazine format, but unfortunately they don't seem to ship outside the US.

Australia / Re: Legal question on photography
« on: August 19, 2014, 11:29:29 AM »
Only a lawyer can advise you of the law and your options, but just because something is printed on a piece of paper doesn't make it legal or enforceable.
Over here it generally does.  I know a bit about Australian law - certainly more than I do about cameras (I did a law degree a few years ago - I'm a bushranger by trade and a little bit of legal knowledge comes in handy.).  Over here, it's pretty settled that as long as the conditions are bought to your attention before you purchase the ticket then the terms are valid.  (Otherwise, what's the point of contracts?)

That being said, as you'd expected, a quick search suggests that Cricket Australia haven't gone around suing people for uploading cricket photos over the last couple of years.  The worst realistic problem is that they won't let you through the gate with a bigger lens.

Australia / Re: Legal question on photography
« on: August 19, 2014, 09:04:47 AM »
You don't watch "The IT Crowd"? (although the show is often a damp squid).

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon mirrorless: Status?
« on: August 19, 2014, 06:04:46 AM »
But the XT1 doesn't meet your criteria ... it's not full frame.

But, but.....N-E-G-L-I-G-B-L-E!  APS-C = FF ;) 

The mirrorless question doesn't have to be us vs them.  As consumers, we all benefit from having a diverse range of cameras available from a wide range of innovative manufacturers.  In 50 years, I'm certain people will look back at this time as a golden era of camera design. 

I've got a couple of Fuji mirrorless cameras - X100 and X-E1(and previously owned an Olympus m43 camera).  IMHO, they are fantastic.  I still take ye olde Canons out of the cupboard when I have specialised needs, but otherwise, mirrorless cameras are more than adequate and in many cases are a much better option.

Re Canon and mirrorless - I don't think they are doing themselves any favours.  If they are going to persist, they should be fully committed to the EOS-M system with more lenses being released and a family of camera bodies of differing levels of specs / price levels.  Instead, currently the Eos-M is a fun accessory for a DSLR shooter rather than the stand alone system that it could be.

EOS Bodies / Re: 5D3 No Longer in Production
« on: August 17, 2014, 01:56:10 AM »
Based on the timing of prior model releases, I suspect 2016 or 2017 is when we're likely to see a 5D4.  I'd be a little surprised if turned up sooner.

Thanks for the suggestions. A few things to check out.

Personally if someone showed up and wanted to run an executable on my computer, they'd be shown the door. 

I find it strange, too.  But it is a compulsory component of a competition I'm entering - "Final output must be as an executable file (.EXE) and burnt to CD/DVD."

The reason that I'm asking for some suggestions is that I downloaded a training video from one of the programs (also in .exe format and I assumed produced on their software).  My antivirus software started flashing red lights about a trojan virus.  Hmmm.

Hi, I need to package a slide show in .exe format.  Does anyone have a suggestion for software to use?  A quick search brings up ProShow Gold and Picturestoexe.  Any recommendations?  Is there anything else to consider?

Business of Photography/Videography / Re: Who owns the photo?
« on: August 08, 2014, 07:12:03 AM »
That's why I think the whole scenario is quite strange.  The EXIF data does contain copyright information.  I think the person who uploaded the photo to Wikimedia was very brave.

Site Information / Re: Critiques
« on: August 06, 2014, 01:07:54 AM »
In theory, it sounds like a good idea.  You could always just post some photos asking for critiques.  A dedicated section on the site might be interesting, but I'm not sure how productive it will be.   The problem with written critiques is that you lose a lot of communication cues from the reviewer. And despite how much you might want honest feedback, most people only like honest feedback if they're saying how awesome your photo is - human nature is such that we perceive a comment which isn't positive as being negative.  And that means that anyone providing a critique really needs to take time to consider the photo and write their thoughts appropriately.  That takes time and might be difficult to maintain if there is a constant stream of photos.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Fun Arias rant on APS-C vs. FF
« on: August 03, 2014, 08:07:47 AM »
All I can say is that I'm in awe of some people here.  I get involved in print judging, and (annoyingly) most people don't say what type of camera/lens combo was used.  And, obviously, there's no EXIF data to review.  I'll admit it,  I'm just not capable of telling what type of camera or brand was used.  But some people here are so confident that there is a night and day difference.  I'm now worried that I must be missing something.  Some even suggest that my eyesight must be defective if you can't see it (ok, my eyesight is defective and I wear glasses...but I see fine with my glasses on). 

Help me!  When I look at a print, what should I be looking for so that I can determine with high level of consistency and certainty if it was taken with a P&S, M43, crop camera, FF, medium format or large format camera?  If it helps, most prints I see are approx 8x12.  I'd love to get this right so that I don't inadvertently promote an image taken with a crop camera over a FF camera.

Canon General / Re: What is your Least Used Piece of Gear?
« on: August 03, 2014, 04:10:01 AM »
I've got a few dozen filters that never leave the cupboard. 

Photography Technique / Photographing Ghosts / UV Photography?
« on: August 01, 2014, 07:09:09 AM »
When you photograph ghosts, do you use the infrared spectrum or UV?  I'm just about to send a camera out for an IR conversion, and am just trying to decide if there is any benefit to a full spectrum conversion compared with a two spectrum conversion.  Apart from potential ghost hunting, seeing how clean your hotel sheets are, checking if your kids have sunscreen on and making sure you haven't been passed some forged banknotes is there any other benefit to a UV conversion?  What type of photographs do you take?  And if you use the UV spectrum, what type of filter do you recommend?

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 54