March 04, 2015, 03:31:53 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - DarkKnightNine

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12
Really Canon?
You needed to hire a third party research firm to discover all of that.
Hell, you could just read this forum for free to find out that and much more. SMH  ::)

EOS Bodies / Re: High Megapixel Camera Coming in 2015 [CR3]
« on: December 17, 2014, 01:50:10 PM »
I hope it's a full frame.

FF is a must if I were considering this camera. I couldn't image getting decent performance from 50MP squeezed onto an APS-C sized sensor. Larger than FF would be a very welcomed surprise that would have me crying with tears of joy.

EOS Bodies / Re: High Megapixel Camera Coming in 2015 [CR3]
« on: December 17, 2014, 01:26:02 PM »
The last time I remember them doing anything that significant was adding radio to the 600EX-RT Flashes, but even that was half-assed because they took away optical IR for no particular reason.

I think the 600EX has both radio and IR.

I'm pretty sure they DO NOT and I know for a fact that the ST-E3-RT Transmitter DOES NOT. They can be fired optically with another 600EX-RT but not optically with anything else. Normally this isn't a problem, but I sometimes mix my Profoto strobes with Speedlites on location and it presents it's challenges. Fortunately Profotos do fire optically when they see my Speedlites fire, but it would be nice to fire everything from my Profoto remote rather than relying on my Speedlites to fire my studio strobes. However at this point we are getting off subject, so let's get back to that new 50MP goodie shall we?

EOS Bodies / Re: High Megapixel Camera Coming in 2015 [CR3]
« on: December 17, 2014, 12:47:43 PM »
This is definitely a camera I would be interested in for my studio.
I've been looking at a lot of Medium Format systems for the past few months and have been disappointed with the trade-offs of upgrading to a MF system. If I can get close to MF resolution but still have the benefits of 35mm system like familiar ergonomics, light weight, weather sealing, fast AF with multiple points, etc... I'm sold.

Reviews / Re: Camera Store Trashes New G7X
« on: October 21, 2014, 12:56:54 AM »
I haven't commented on this forum for a while (even though I read it regularly) because the attitude of most people here. The notion that you have to be a total Canon fanboy to have legitimacy to post here, is absurd at best and does nothing to help the end user nor Canon.

I am not the casual photographer like many here, I make my living from photography and my work is published in magazines like Vogue so it might be possible that I know a few things.

That being said, NO I don't own a G7X, but I do agree with the Camera Store's assessment of Canon as a company lately. They seem to put just enough features on their cameras to stay above water, but never go that extra mile to make a ground-breakingly outstanding product. When compared to other products on the market, Canon always seems to be following not leading, which is a shame. I absolutely loath their "play it safe" attitude toward product development.

I own and shoot with all Canon gear (except for my recently purchased Phase One) and I'm generally happy with it, but it does not mean it's all perfect. For example, the rubber zoom ring on my new 24-70 MkII dislodged itself from the lens barrel and is now warped and in need of repair. Are you kidding me?!!! Unacceptable for a lens I paid over $2,000 for.

It should also be noted that I am regularly an early adopter of all Canon gear and usually own one while most people are still sitting on forums discussing specs. I was one of the first people in the world to own the original 7D, the 5D Mark III and the 1DX as well as various lenses. Again, I am happy with most of my Canon gear and the 1DX's low light performance continues to astonish me, but in no way do I think all Canon gear is perfect and I think the people on this forum should have a more open minded attitude toward possible flaws and imperfections and not just write anyone who brings them up as unknowledgeable and just a trolling. You are not helping Canon make better products by defending their flaws and/or shortcomings.

EOS Bodies / Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« on: November 20, 2013, 04:21:41 PM »
Like I said before. Canon's "Answer" to the Nikon D800 (and future D900, and the Sony A7R) will come as a big bulky elephant sized 1D-body, with a price tag that most people can't touch.

Ok, then...but what are Nikon and Sony's "Answers" to the 5DIII, which has outsold the D800 and will vastly outsell the a7R?   ::)

Why do people think Canon needs to play Nikon's game?  The D800 was Nikon's attempt to play the game by Canon's rules (we'll see your 8-9 MP increase, and raise you by another 14 MP), and Nikon lost.
When someone attacks a Canon body, you always resort to raw sales. That'S not very interesting.

I agree. We need to look at more than 'numbers sold'. For example there are great movies that have not done super business at the box office. But they have been amazing.
To say Nikon 'lost' is perhaps harsh. As the IQ of the D800 is certainly better than 5d3. A photographer friend who switched from 5d2 to D800 showed me comparisons on his laptop and I cannot any longer defend the IQ of 5d3 vs D800. I do realize 'but but' of autofocus, responsiveness etc but am talking just about IQ.

I double down on that. Sales figures has Canon being complacement in the innovation Dept.

YES! I'm sure I will be buying a Sony A7 for its compact size and that appeals to me as a carry around camera vs shooting images with my iPhone or carrying around one of my three full sized DSLRs with several lenses. NOT because I think it will produce better images nor will it ever replace my Canons. I own both the 1DX and the 5D Mark III. Both cameras serve me well and produce image quatlity that still to this day never ceases to amaze me. A few weeks ago I shot a concert in an extremely dark venue and for the first time, I allowed my Canons to shoot at 12,800 ISO. Of course there was noise in the images, but I was still blown away at how comparatively clean they were. Canon sensors have been getting a bad rep for not keeping up with the Joneses, but for those of us who shoot professionally, it has not affected our work not one single bit. Both top of the line Canons produce excellent images even at high ISOs. Yes Sony and Nikon can brag about great new sensor technology, but I can brag about great images. At the end of the day, that's what's most important to me and my clients. Canon sensors may not be the shiny new kids on the block, but they get the job done.

PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot G16 Announced
« on: August 22, 2013, 07:43:15 AM »
No this? No that?
It seems like a lot of people want more and more bang for their buck and rightly so. This "Give them as minimum as possible" philosophy is eventually going to backfire for Canon. Someone over there needs to stop listening to the bean counters and start loving photography. Canon could do so much better if they would just stop thinking about high profit margins and start thinking about volume sales. Give customers as much as possible for their money and they'll be flying off the shelves so fast, they won't be able to keep up with the demand. For some reason, no one over there at Canon seems to understand this.

Lighting / Re: 600ex as main lights
« on: August 19, 2013, 11:56:37 PM »
I'll never go back to 580's. They are dead to me with my 600RT's.

You can do most of your weddings and events with just the speedlites but If you want those nice big modifiers, Strobe's are still the way to go.

I would have to agree. Speedlites (especially the 600EX-RT) are excellent if you know how to use them off camera, but if you want to use large modifiers, by the time you buy enough Speedlites to illuminate them properly, you'd probably be better off with something like the Broncolor Move (Head and battery pack).

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70D Reaction
« on: July 02, 2013, 04:55:34 AM »
Let's see...there are xxxxD cameras, xxxD cameras, xxD cameras, 7D, 5-series, and 1-series cameras.  Of all those lines, how many have reused sensors?  One.  Not coincidentally, it's the only line refreshed annually.  Think consumers would pay the increased cost to fund development of a new sensor for the xxxD line every year?

Oh, and the T2i has phase detection on the CMOS sensor, right?   ::)
Tell me with a straight face that you can tell meaningful performance differences of the sensor between those crop sensors.  If so, how?  Remember, keep the comments to meaningful rather than de minimus.  Tell me which does not look like cat barf at 1600 ISO.  Your 7D sure does and it is the best of the bunch.

My point was that there's no incentive for Canon to (really) update the sensor in a line that's updated every year.  Doing so would make no fiscal sense, for them. Reusing sensors does, and passing them down from higher lines to lower lines also makes fiscal sense.  They are having no problems selling the cameras using (and reusing) those sensors, and they're making a profit and gaining market share in a time when other companies are reporting losses and/or borrowing heavily.

Can you tell me with a straight face that you expect Canon to release a Rebel body with a truly new sensor every year?  Just to please you?  ::)

No they shouldn't "just to please him". They should be improving sensor quality across their range because the competition and market warrants it. Even amateurs are more educated these days and are demanding better and better image quality and they are getting it. Canon is in the business of making imaging products and to continue to be successful in that market, they should be innovating and raising the bar across their entire product line. So HELL YES!, they should be making better products all the time. I buy Canon for three main reasons 1. No one has a better range of lenses that make any sense to me. 2. I love the ergonomics of their camera bodies (they just feel better in my hands) 3. Their interface is simple, easy-to-use and is virtually the same across their line so that you could pick up almost any Canon DSLR and feel at home rather quickly. Of course there are other innovations that I love like the 600EX-RT Flashes, but aforementioned are the main three. Canon has been lazy about developing sensor technology and could and should be investing more into it. I would say their best sensor (to date) is in the 1DX. That sensor just dominates noise at higher ISO levels. Love that beast of a camera! But I think that similar kind of performance should be trickling down throughout the entire range. Let's hope we'll see some of that with the new 70D.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70D Reaction
« on: July 01, 2013, 11:00:50 AM »
Why is such fowl language trash allowed on this site ?

There is no insight/experience or information in this video ? He reads the spec and curses ?
Free speech, even foul language should be permitted; however, appropriate warnings should be given that such language is used.

Foul language is a sign of those without proper education. They cannot make an impact with normal vocabulary, so they resort to cursing. It speaks volume about the speaker and less about the message. I'm unswayed but a curse-filled rant than I might have been with an educated discussion.

Steve Jobs cursed all the time and yet some people thought he was a genius.  ::)

I don't get how you people equate the use or non-usage of foul language as a representation of a person's intelligence. I know people who sound like very eloquent idiots. They use large words to sound intelligent but have absolutely no substance in what they are saying.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70D Reaction
« on: July 01, 2013, 10:53:08 AM »
First of all how can anyone take this guy seriously when he can't even give any constructive criticism without swearing. I seriously stopped the video after 20 secs. We haven't even seen sample images yet and this guy is already complaining about it. Freaking trolls man, trolls...

What's the difference between "freakin" and "f*ckin"? If you are going to substitute, you might as well use the real thing. That's like people who mistakenly think margarine is better for their body than real butter. By the time your body processes all the imitation garbage that is in margarine, it would be better to have just eaten real butter and exercise accordingly. Using foul language doesn't distract from a point and using substitute words in place of them doesn't validate yours.

The problem isn't his language but his premature judging of a product that isn't even out yet. Canon may introduce new sensor technology that nullifies all of his arguments about noise. That and only that is his only mistake IMO.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70D Reaction
« on: July 01, 2013, 10:42:25 AM »
I would agree that this guy should have just waited for the camera to be put in the hands of real photographers in everyday use before jumping to conclusions, but the performance of companies of late hasn't been all that spectacular and Canon is not exempt from that judgment. Look at new products like the Xbox One. It seems like these large companies are driven more and more by profit than innovation.

I for one am hoping Canon proves this guy wrong, but if I am to be totally honest, my expectations for any large company these days are fairly low. Canon the ball is in your court. Shut the naysayers up.... PLEASE!

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 70D a New Benchmark in ISO Performance?
« on: July 01, 2013, 10:25:44 AM »
Sounds exciting!

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: The Blackmagic Production Camera 4K
« on: April 09, 2013, 07:45:01 PM »
Let's hope Canon is paying attention, because THIS is how you innovate!
You offer a camera that is much better than your previous model with features that your most discerning customers want and that won't make it obsolete in a year or two. Features that look to the future like Thunderbolt I/O and 4K video capture. And then you offer it at a price that makes your competitors' heads spin. Bravo to BlackMagic for showing the big boys how it's done. This is the company that RED Digital Cinema should have been but alas they've become just like all the rest.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12