Typically because IMG_4381 was the last file to be written to the card. I would not only format, but reset your 60D file naming. Even a newly formatted card will start at 4383 unless you now reset the camera.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I'd like to see 28-70/2.8L IS instead
I'd like to see IS & non-IS versions of both. I'd probably go for the non-IS version for the 14-24, but I could see more video orientated people going for the IS version if it existed. For the 24-70, I'd want the IS version for sure though.
Whats the point of two version, just use of IS on/off will do the job. If cost is the reason, then current version is fine. I don't see point of two version of 24-70 II IS
What's the point of two 70-200/4 & two 70-200/2.8 then?
Adding IS isn't all positives. It adds significant size, weight, complexity, and the biggest issue for most; cost. Best case scenario, IS will only add $500-600 to the cost. That's still a fairly significant sum. I'm sure many people that don't want or need IS would opt for the non-IS version.