October 25, 2014, 08:53:49 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bchernicoff

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 38
226
Reviews / Re: Review - Canon EF 85 f/1.2L II
« on: March 05, 2013, 01:34:14 PM »
There is no need to debate UV filters (again) in this thread. I wish these forums were better moderated.

228
Reviews / Re: Review - Canon EF 85 f/1.2L II
« on: March 05, 2013, 12:29:00 PM »
Did you have any concern with the gap between the protruding barrel and the outer lens body?

229
I bought a 2711 to sit next to my 27" iMac to gain wide color gamut. The anti-glare coating makes the monitor useless for photographic work. I can't really describe how bad it is. It's like someone put a thin film of prisms in front of the screen. You get multi-colored sparkles everywhere. The monitor now sits on the floor, unplugged.

EDIT: For what it's worth, I don't know if the 2713 has an improved anti-glare filter or not.

230
Lenses / Re: Photozone spanks the 24-70 F4 USM L IS
« on: March 04, 2013, 01:18:44 PM »
I don't know if I would call that a spanking. The review is mostly very positive with one big gotcha. That big gotcha plus the high cost of this lens means I would expect few to choose it over the 24-105. Maybe that does add up to a spanking.  ;)

231
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 12-24 f/2.8L [CR1]
« on: February 27, 2013, 03:14:18 PM »
Meanwhile, I truck along quite happy with my Rokinon/Samyang 14mm f/2.8

232
Canon General / Re: How well do you see color?
« on: February 25, 2013, 08:53:00 PM »
16...with a couple bourbon in me...

233
Lenses / Re: Photozone has released their review of the Sigma 35 1.4...
« on: February 23, 2013, 07:59:42 PM »
Here are two from today in Brooklyn. Shot with the Sigma...both at 1.4

234
Canon General / Re: The Canon EOS 7D & EF 400 f/2.8L IS II Break a Record
« on: February 22, 2013, 12:47:08 PM »
That's 4:01 I'll never get back.

I warned you!  ;)

235
Canon General / Re: The Canon EOS 7D & EF 400 f/2.8L IS II Break a Record
« on: February 22, 2013, 12:31:12 PM »
There is a crappy video of this rig in action on this page: http://www.dr-clauss.de/de/blog-3/current/item/243-london-320

236
Lenses / Re: Photozone has released their review of the Sigma 35 1.4...
« on: February 21, 2013, 03:04:20 PM »
Have you tried AF speed and accuracy against the 35 L?

The AF speed and accuracy are as good as anything Canon offers. Sigma has finally nailed AF with Canon.
I would argue this is a better lens than 35L in every way but weather sealing. Some would favor the OOF rendering of the Canon over the razor sharpness of the Sigma. To each their own. No reason for a current 35L owner to switch though.

237
EOS Bodies / Re: 2013 Predictions for Canon EOS Products
« on: February 19, 2013, 06:16:30 PM »
The 3D will have eye-controlled focus and a blink-activated shutter. You heard it here first.   :P

You joke, but I like the eye controlled focus of my Elan 7e. I don't know if the technology is accurate enough to select and individual AF point in a 61pt grid, but if it's close it would be awesome.

238
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Spec List [CR2]
« on: February 19, 2013, 09:48:49 AM »

239
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Spec List [CR2]
« on: February 19, 2013, 09:40:54 AM »
Even Sony's 24mp APS-C sensor has too much noise. Do we really believe for a second that Canon is going to come out with a sensor that beats theirs? I'm not down on Canon...I LOVE my 5D Mk III, I just feel like people in this thread are getting their hopes up A LOT.

240
Heptagon, I sold my 24-105 in favor of the Tamron last month. You don't say which body you will use it on, but I had to AFMA the Tamron on my Mk3 where-as the 24-105 was spot on out of the box.

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 38