July 30, 2014, 02:01:53 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - bchernicoff

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 37
EOS Bodies / Re: Search on 5D mark iii with B&H provides a hint
« on: February 24, 2012, 01:47:22 PM »
I've seen rumors saying their are two things:

1.  the 10th generation of the EOS System.  (How they count generations is beyond me, there are lots of theories)

2.  The metger of the 7D and the 5D line into one body.

I expect we might see some more X's in the other categories if this is true.  10X, 100X, 1000X ??

I think the first is referring to the 1D X.  That was language Canon used in its announcement.

Sports / Re: Cars cars cars (and some bikes)
« on: February 21, 2012, 05:33:37 PM »
The soon to be released Audi RS5

United States / Re: Annular Eclipse May 20th, 2012
« on: February 21, 2012, 03:25:03 PM »
I didn't know a thing about this. Thank you so much for bringing it up. I think I will definitely travel for this. There is a lot of consider to get the right foreground for this event. Hmm...

Portrait / Re: Candid portraits
« on: February 20, 2012, 10:32:54 AM »
They each capture the essence of childhood, that sweet innocence that burns off somewhere in the teens.

Well, that innocence wore off two seconds later when she made the face she always makes while being photographed. The only keepers with her are the candids ;-)

Portrait / Re: Candid portraits
« on: February 20, 2012, 10:13:36 AM »
7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS

Canon General / Re: Warranty / Registration question
« on: February 19, 2012, 04:00:38 PM »
Thanks for the info.

Canon General / Warranty / Registration question
« on: February 19, 2012, 11:22:31 AM »
Is the warranty card actually needed for warranty service on a Canon body or lens if I registered them after I purchased them?

Lenses / Re: What lens for 7D EF-S or L
« on: February 15, 2012, 11:58:24 AM »
I used the Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 on my 7D and loved it. You might also consider the EF-S 15-85. It's supposed to be L sharp, but not as fast as the 17-55. You wouldn't need f/2.8 for landscapes though.


Landscape / Re: Snowy pictures
« on: February 09, 2012, 05:39:29 PM »
Two more from the same trip.

I really have to give a plug for Silver Efex Pro and Color Efex Pro.

Lenses / Re: First LensRental Just Arrived
« on: February 09, 2012, 04:45:06 PM »
I just buy the lens.  Instead of renting for a few days, if there's a lens I am interested in trying, but not certain is the right lens for me, I watch my local Craiglist boards (quite active here), and buy the lens used.

I do the same in the Washington DC area and haven't been disappointed. My most recent purchase was an excellent 400mm f/2.8 L II for $3400. Given what the IS Mk I and now Mk II's go for it was a steal.

Landscape / Re: Snowy pictures
« on: February 09, 2012, 02:16:01 PM »
From last month in Colorado...

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II Announced
« on: February 07, 2012, 08:47:20 PM »
I've made an animated gif comparing the resolution charts of this new lens at 70mm to the 70-200mm f/2.8 L II at 70mm, since that is something a lot of us can relate to. It seems like it will deliver some stunning results (better at 70mm anyway).

EOS Bodies / Re: 1D X high res samples just appeared
« on: February 07, 2012, 03:40:44 PM »
I'm very disappointed that they choose to release unrealistic exposures as examples. Who shoots 1/8000s at ISO800? No one. I get they want to show some higher ISO images, but how about some realistic low-light shots?

EOS Bodies / Re: 1D X high res samples just appeared
« on: February 07, 2012, 03:21:41 PM »
So, Canon has posted some in-camera JPEGs. How long until we see the embargo on other images lifted?

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 37