October 21, 2014, 08:16:52 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - infared

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 64
181
It's Simple...
BOTH!!!! :-X

182
Lenses / Re: Review: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens
« on: June 11, 2014, 07:53:23 PM »
Personally I cannot wait to purchase mine. I will when there is no backlog...no hurry.
Gee.. I have 30 days to return it at B&H for full refund.  I am sure it will be a great lens tho.
One thing you can bet. I am not going to over measurebate it and spend the rest of my life here complaining about it...I will be out creating images!!!!!   ;D ;) :) :o 8)
...but hey...I loved my original Sigma 50mm f/1.4.  Had a GREAT copy...just sold it for $500! LOL...$100 more than I paid for it.as they have been backorder for a while and I had a colleague who loved the lens and wanted my copy!!!!..Hated to see it go...but I cannot justify owning that and the new one....WHAH!!!!!

I would also like to read Justin's review before purchase, as I know that that should be coming soon!

Oh, then you're gonna love this: Popular Photography apparently did a test on the new lens and concluded it was not as good as the last 50mm f/1.4.  I nearly coughed up breakfast when I read about that!

LOL!  Scott ...THAT is pretty funny!  The old Sigma 50mm "Edged it out"???? (In what parameter??   Size? Price?) Guess they got a lot of hits on their site?
What is even funnier is that Pop Photography included the old Sigma DG f/1.4 in the same sentence with the prized and worshiped (hear angels sing), Otus. quite amusing.
The old one is a cool "little" lens compared to these newer, pricier entries....apparently Sigma is going to keep producing it...the lens has gone up in price and the Canon version is quite scare lately....

183
Lenses / Re: Review: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens
« on: June 11, 2014, 07:47:08 AM »
Personally I cannot wait to purchase mine. I will when there is no backlog...no hurry.
Gee.. I have 30 days to return it at B&H for full refund.  I am sure it will be a great lens tho.
One thing you can bet. I am not going to over measurebate it and spend the rest of my life here complaining about it...I will be out creating images!!!!!   ;D ;) :) :o 8)
...but hey...I loved my original Sigma 50mm f/1.4.  Had a GREAT copy...just sold it for $500! LOL...$100 more than I paid for it.as they have been backorder for a while and I had a colleague who loved the lens and wanted my copy!!!!..Hated to see it go...but I cannot justify owning that and the new one....WHAH!!!!!

I would also like to read Justin's review before purchase, as I know that that should be coming soon!

184
Hey...I had the same CPF card fail for me....can't remember the error message I was getting whilst shooting..but my 5DIII was giving me a strange error message...butt....I could view the images in the camera on the card...so I thought everything was cool....but when I got home ....nothing.. ...Glad I had the SD card..saved my but...I just reshot stuff....as I was suspicious even though I could view the images on the LCD....
I even tried my iSky Soft Data recovery software.
http://www.iskysoft.com/data-recovery-mac

Has worked great for me in the past if I format the card or something stupid (duh)...it gets it all back for me!   ;D 
...but alas..It did not recover any images off of the failed Lexar..
 ....So whatever happened with the failure of the card I attribute to Lexar....
The card was not mishandled, always ejected..blah..blah....
I got in touch with them and sent it in and they sent me another card......No Charge...
I have never had that happen before.......my Sandisks have never failed.......At least mine was not something with super important images.....
....but just be careful if you ever get an error message (it had a number assoc.with it.. ...but I do not remember what the number was)...cause even if you can view them on the camera's LCD...you could be $hit out of luck!!!!!
From what Chris has told us..I believe that my card failure was similar in nature  to the type he had as my data recovery software did no work.

185
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: May 19, 2014, 03:54:41 PM »
I have some recent baby photos!  8)

Hi Infared, I like it, as I like a lot of your Images, I've tried to think on why, other than your Images are always technically well done, I think it's the approach, you present your Images a little outside the Box, well, inside the Black Box actually, but they always make me think, which I like.

Thanks EML....yeah...I come from a dark place  8)....Thanks for looking....I LOVE tomscott's lamb on this page which totally brightens up my day, though!!!! LOL! Great shot and love the bokeh & colors.

186
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: May 18, 2014, 09:18:15 AM »
I have some recent baby photos!  8)


That's creepy. Nice shots tho...

Thanks R1 ...yeah...they were meant to be chilling...I just love the bokeh of the 85L ...it is amazing.

187
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: May 17, 2014, 06:24:10 PM »
I have some recent baby photos!  8)

188
So on the fence about cancelling until issues and supplies are all worked out...But keep imagining this will be a great newborn lens...

Sure hope I'm not getting one of the lenses the OCD folk are tweaking to death and returning.  The stories here of lens churn are revolting.

Well said ...I think more than a few are over-tweaked!  8)
I am looking forward to Dustin Abbott's  review/comparison of both Sigma 50's...hope he got the Sigma Dock,too as I would like to hear what he has to say about that as well. His take is reliable, experienced, real-world and relevant. 
No measurbating.

189
It seems that the recent competition for Sigma has propitiated that Canon launch prices closer to market reality. If the picture is as good as it looks on the MTF chart, these two lenses are sales success.

Sure the EF-S looks a good price, but the 16-35 is a 17-40 replacement, at 150% the price. Not saying I feel the 16-35 is particularly expensive, and I very much doubt Sigma had anything to do with it at all, just pointing out it is 150% more than the lens it is replacing with less zoom range.

I do not think of the 16-35 as having less zoom range......17-16mm is more significant than you would think.
Also...I returned my 17-40mm in one day because the zoom "throw" of the zoom ring was non-existent at the wide end....like super abrupt....not spread out like at the other end.  I know everyone has a different take and no one is right or wrong..but I just don't need 35-40mm. I have a 24-70mmII an the 16-35mm II now...If I am going out with just zooms..its a nice overlap...the 16-35mmII is weakest (sharpness) at the 35mm end...and the other lens handles that area quite handily......
I bought the 17-40mm initially to save money and ended up getting rid of that notion! LOL!

190
I think that the new 16-35mm IS will be a big seller... if I had all three (17-40, 16-35mm 2.8II), this would be the tempting option.. In Canon's new (absurd) pricing structure I am pleasantly surprised at the intro price of this lens. I think this lens makes the 17-40mm a non-entity (except for price!).  When I  added an ultra-wide zoom to my quiver I had initially purchased the 17-40mm but sent it right back...What bothered me was the "short throw" in the zoom ring at the wide end.  There was very little to no separation between focal lengths. This is not talked about very often, but it was a total deal-breaker for me.  I ended up biting the bullet and waiting for a good sale/rebate situation on the 16-35II.  In the current spread and pricing of Canon lenses I this this offering and pricepoint  seem reasonable (relatively).  Although, my last lens purchase was a Sigma (35mm), and my next lens purchase will be a Sigma (50mm), too!.....so perhaps Canon will become even more "reasonable" with their price structure as it has been woobling out of control!   8)

191


My thoughts, exactly.
I've bought a 17-40 for less then $500 recently, in perfect condition. I know it have some drawbacks, and not perfect. So is 16-35II, compared to 35L I own.
That new lenses should be really, really sharp and rise the quality mark. Otherwise I'd prefer primes over them.
[/quote]

How do you compare a 35L to the 16-35 f/2.8II?  One thing that the 16-35mm can do a whole lot better than the 35L is 16-34mm!!!!!!!!  LOL..you had to know you were walking into that one!   ;D

192
Upgraded from the original Simga 50 to the Art 50…. Have a much higher hit percentage on the autofocus, and the image is just very sweet…  I would recommend upgrading (the size isn't that much more in reality, unless it just won't fit in your camera bag).
Stop..stop...I have to buy a new truck for work....stop!!!!!! LOL!

193
B&H is going to send me both the 50 Art along with the older Sigma 50 so I can compare them side by side.  I don't own the Sigma dock, and so I am wondering how much of a factor that is going to be to getting accurate AF from the newer lens.

Do I need to have them send me the dock, too?

COOL! I can't wait to read your comparison!
 I own the original 50mm (and I have an Art 35mm and just bought a dock for it and potentially to use with a 50mm Art as well.)
I am on the fence about the 50mm Art.  Really like my original 50mm Sigma.   I know that the new lens will be sharper, more contrast etc...just way better in most respects...yet the original is way smaller, and has a great rendering more like the 50mmL in many respects.  I even have a friend dying to buy my old Sigma...so it is tempting to step up to the new ART.....
Yesterday, I downloaded the software for the Sigma Dock and updated the firmware on my 35mm Art...which was already one of my favorite lenses...Pretty cool tech there. I plan on learning the software soon and understanding how it adjusts the focus..but to tell you the truth, I have no complaints with that lens.
Get the Dock, Dustin and do a full uber review on the whole shebang...I think everyone will enjoy that!

194
LOL...that is one of the reasons why I got out of the business and became a carpenter.  I got away from photography completely (so sad), during the whole film>digital transition.  I got back in when the 5DII came to market (I used to be a nikon film guy..but I thought that was the most affordable digital finally equals film camera to finally come along).   I have been shooting ever since prodigiously ever since...FOR ME!  I love it.
I can not imaging shooting professionally now...at the risk of sounding like an arrogant snob...everyone has a cell phone and takes pictures and they can be your "director" at a photoshoot...thinking that they know a lot about professional photography based on "their" experience.  They have no clue what a good photographer brings to the table.  ...but like someone said above ....shoot safety shots and cover your ass.  It is frustrating..no? ...they see your best work, hire you and then want safe medeocrity....and you walk away so unfulfilled.    LOL.   It has to be worse now than ever with instagram, snapchat, etc....EVERYONE thinks they are a photographer. Shoot a pic, run it thru some software, immediate gratification....I am an expert!!!!   
I know I am oversimplifying it.... but...just shooting for me gives me MORE joy, knowing everything that I know.
Your shot at the top of the page totally tells the story beautifully....but they were not looking for your ability and vision, they wanted snapshots of their volunteers.  Don't you see, your intellect and vision are the problem.  Not them!!!!!(very high sarcasm).   LOL!
Nice work...I understand your dilemma.   Perhaps you can balance it out and continue...

195
Animal Kingdom / Re: Cuteness Overload
« on: May 10, 2014, 08:05:32 AM »
The expression of the chick in 8766 is priceless ;D

(No, you guys, not THAT kind of chick)  ::)

That expression is priceless! Oh the sassiness of youth!!! He is a real tough guy, til his mother is not around. LOL.
Unexpectedly beautiful photos!!!

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 64