May 21, 2013, 05:54:40 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - paul13walnut5

Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 65
586
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Canon are you listening...?? NIKON D600
« on: August 06, 2012, 06:40:40 PM »
I had an Mavica FD88.  Bought new.  It wasn't the early 80's.  Very late 90's early 00's!

1.3 of your megapixels.


587
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Firmware update for 7D
« on: August 06, 2012, 11:07:31 AM »
I am quite keen myself, but I'd rather wait a few extra days and hope the new firmware is stable.   The 7D doesn't have a great track record for unstable firmware updates.

I was shooting with a UDMA card at the weekend in 8fps and AiServo, and will welcome the even greater buffer depth. 

But then I'll be optimistic if my UDMA card doesn't corrupt every 3rd use this firmware version...

Audio tweeks welcome as well..

But I'm prepared to wait for a version that works.

588
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Recording time cornfuzion?!
« on: August 06, 2012, 06:21:31 AM »
Quote
We need shallow DOF because of video screen behind the speaker so standard prosumer video cams look bad.

You need to think about focal length, you need to think about perspective (perhaps more distance between the speaker and the screen) the larger sensor will help a little, but if its a problem with a conventional camera I don't think its something that a DSLR in and of itself would enitrely eradicate.

2nd problem with DSLRs and video screens in shot is the scanning pattern.  If you use a camcorder off the same phase mains then it usually isn't an issue, if you use a camcorder or camera off of battery it can be, and can be compounded if the video screen is traditional interlace and the camcorder is progressive (as on the EOS cameras) canon video cameras sometimes feature a clearscan mode to eradicate the scanning pattern, I'm not sure if the 1DC or c300 etc feature this, I'm fairly certain that it  would be a bit specialist for the lower EOS cameras.

1: Max recording time on any card depends on the size of the card.  Max file size under the FAT32 formatting is 4GB.  This equates to around 11 mins per clip at 1080.  More recent EOS cameras such as the 1DC, 1DX, 5D3 and (I think) the 650D feature continuous recording across files up to a clip maximum of 29mins (this is to avoid a different product classification)  If you load magic lantern onto some cams (5D2, 60D, 600D, 550D) you can lower the recording data rate to get longer run times within the 4GB cap.

2: No.  Big cards tend to be very very expensive, and there is an arguement that if you have smaller cards and one fails or corrupts it's less of a problem than if a huge card fails.

3: Yep you can start a new file straight away, prolonged recording times may cause the sensor to overheat.

4: For this application I would say you are better with conventional camcorders.  Maybe Canon X300s or x105s or similar.

589
Lenses / Re: Buying 70-300mm L whilst working in USA
« on: August 05, 2012, 08:53:03 PM »
There are a few trustworthy 'grey' dealers in the UK.   I bought my 7D, grip and 70-200 f2.8 from one (on seperate occassions) and my T2i and T3i from another (again on seperate occasions)  they both ship from in the UK and they promise to have taken care of any taxes.  Never had a problem.  That way you've not got any hassle with customs, and no worries about your case getting bashed about or pilfered....

I won't advertise the sellers on here, but if you want to PM me I'll give you their details.

Canon and their importers are just taking the mick with some of their recent prices, you aren't alone in seeking a better value alternative route.

590
Lenses / Re: Lens Recomendation
« on: August 05, 2012, 08:48:36 PM »
You don't state the body, so it's hard to be definitive.

I'll answer the last part of your question from my experience, but as I may be using different kit, it may not be entirely relevant.

I use APS-C format DSLRs, I've had an XTi, a T2i and currently a 7D and a T3i.

I've had the following lenses as 'standard zooms'

The 18-55 II.  Crap. Avoid. Will only work on APS-C in anycase.

The 17-40 f4L.  Great on APS-C.  Weather sealed.  Good IQ up until extreme corners omn APS-C. Fast focusing.

The 18-55 IS.  Vast improvement over 18-55 II, and actually more versatile range and sharper than the 17-40.  I actually sold the 17-40 when I got this lens because I just wasn't using the 17-40.

Currently, Sigma 18-50 EX DC f2.8 Macro.  Bought for constant fast aperture (for video) useful close focus (for video) and is decent allrounder.  Newer OS version is better again but double the cash.  Slowish and noisy focus (not an issue for video as I only use MF)  Very decent lens, very happy with it, does nice stills as well as great video.

So you'll see my emphasis on sensor type and the predominance of video.  As such my experience may not be that useful, depending on your aims and body...   

591
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Firmware update for 7D
« on: August 05, 2012, 08:38:16 PM »
Any reason for your anxiety?

The 7D will still work as it has since 1.2.5 in the meantime.

You have other cameras in your arsenal that equal or outperform the 7D for specific features.

Whats the rush?

592
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Canon are you listening...?? NIKON D600
« on: August 05, 2012, 07:00:32 PM »
TIFFs, crikey.  Does it work with IBM microdrives as well?

593
Lenses / Re: New Tilt-Shifts in 2013? [CR1]
« on: August 03, 2012, 07:33:02 PM »
I have a direct and forthright manner about me, and I'm also a fairly digital personality (things are black and white, I leave the 50 shades of grey to frustrated housewives)

I have been accused of trolling, an insult I would strongly refute, however I do believe very much in the marketplace of ideas and the discipline, technique, art, practice, enjoyment of photography being a broad church (or mosque or synagog or chapel for that matter)

I need to remind myself that even the best ideas (as mine usually are I'm sure you'll agree) put across in the wrong way (as mine also usually are I'm sure you'll agree) don't win an argument, or the more desirable outcome get folk thinking...  winning an argument doesn't always make you the winner.   Getting folk to think and test their own opinions (and perhaps even choosing to stand by them) makes the process the winner.

A joke can be lost when typed, without the benefit of intonation, a raised eye brow, a smirk.

I'm here to improve my photography, and if I feel my experience can help somebody else do the same then I'll share.  I'll get it wrong.  I'll get it right. 

But I've been off work this week and out with my camera in some rare scottish sun (in summer time as well - who would have thought) and I didn't think once about the alleged banding on my 7D, or the soft corners on my zoom at 200, proven by a photo of a lens chart, or even much about CR.

I enjoyed my photography.   I hope amongst the heated tempers and cross words that folks remember to do that.  I may get called a troll for this sign off, but in 100 years time when we are dust, or worm feed or whatever, and folk find our photograph of a since demolished building, of a long forogotton car, of a band who later broke big, of a way of life, do you think they will question the MTFs? the shadow banding? that it wasn't taken on a nikon D800?

Nah of course not.  We make images. I'm an amateur.  And proud to do it for the love of it.

594
Lens Gallery / Re: Canon EF17-40mm f/4L USM
« on: August 02, 2012, 05:55:12 AM »
EOS 400D (XTi) & 17-40 f4L


595
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: Speedlite help?
« on: August 02, 2012, 05:53:28 AM »
There are other flash options (including radio flash) if you are happy with your 5D2... just not from canon.

596
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: Speedlite help?
« on: August 01, 2012, 08:17:15 PM »
My experience of the old ST-E2 was that you couldn't 2nd curtain, synch speed and HSS however were unaffected..

If you have a pre-2012 camera then perhaps better to stick to a pre-2012 flash system?   There is a difference between a new system being backwards compatable (that is the 5D3 working with older EX guns) and an old system being forward compatable...  like expecting a 5D2 to work with a flash system that hadn't been invented yet.



597
Lenses / Re: New Tilt-Shifts in 2013? [CR1]
« on: July 31, 2012, 05:45:35 PM »
@kirillica
Quote
and guys, as I'm looking for a new lens, can you please shortly describe (with photos as well) what you need TS lenses for? I can afford any of them, but I'm worried if I will ever use one...

I used mine (24 TS-E) for the usual converging vertical corrections (In the slipway shot I wanted to keep the camera back level so as to keep the bridge pillar and the reflection straight,  the shift let me do this but also move the frame to the interesting area)..

but also parallax free panoramic stitching using the shift movement along a horizontal plane.. on both these shots  (Garrison House cumbrae, and Erskine Bridge pano) a wider angle lens could have been used, but it would have affected the image resolution, by shifting and stitching I was able to generate a much higher resolution image without parallax issues, as the camera back was always in the same position.

And finally I used it for the selective depth of field trick.  I could have used the tilt the other way to increase the depth of field, prefered this way to focus on a specific area, this let me focus on the same plane as the sloping rock in the foreground, where as a conventional lens would have only given me a slice of focus this close to the camera.

598
Sports / Re: 2012 London Olympics
« on: July 31, 2012, 05:22:34 PM »
@squarebox
Quote
Except all the cameras in the pool itself are 1Dxs... 

Reluctant as I am to point this out, but I would have thought it immediately apparent that I was being ironic, given recent media coverage of the threat to deny entry to folk wearing rival brands from the official sponsors.

I had hoped that where I had typed
Quote
Not really.
that this would have given the game away THAT I WASN'T BEING SERIOUS, THAT IT WASN'T A STATEMENT WHICH HAD A BASIS IN FACT in case anybody really didn't get it.

Apparently not though, so I thank you for the comment.   

If they are in the pool then Canon must have really upped their waterproofing? I hope nobody has to change lenses...

Not really... etc etc

599
There is also the small issue of how the camera is being held... it is better braced when held to the eye, in typical 'live view' holding mode the camera wobbles when you press the shutter.
Unless you are using some sort of support.

600
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Lens Help: 16-35mm or 17-40mm for video?
« on: July 30, 2012, 10:20:33 PM »
rotolights are great for close interview work, & cheap.  Ish.  Great for the subject.

Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 65