August 29, 2014, 08:11:40 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wellfedCanuck

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 17
31
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS not good for NASA?
« on: April 26, 2013, 09:40:01 AM »
NASA uses Nikon because nearly every MF telephoto NIKKOR lens can focus beyond infinity.

Don't you mean:


32
*edit*
Sorry, possibly bad information the first time- could just be a charging issue...

33
I have a non-Canon battery as a backup for my 6D. It's about 6 weeks old and other than not properly communicating its charge level, has previously worked fine in the camera.

Last week while on a family vacation and changing batteries late at night- I accidently selected the (paraphrasing) "ignore this battery?" prompt. Poof. The camera no longer plays nice with that specific battery.

I've been through the manual and can't find a way to reverse this setting. Anyone know how to do this?

34
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS not good for NASA?
« on: April 24, 2013, 10:39:22 PM »
Chris Hadfield explains how he takes photos from space:
http://petapixel.com/2013/04/22/astronaut-chris-hadfield-explains-how-to-take-pictures-from-the-iss/

Caution: graphic Nikon images... :o

35
Site Information / Re: Minimum CR Forum IQ?
« on: April 11, 2013, 11:37:32 AM »
.We just had a thread shut down for being "beyond stupid." That would suggest that posts must meet a certain intellectual level before proceeding to full forum discussion. What's the standard?

Although I didn't personally find the original post all that funny, I agree with you that we don't need humour police. The membership will either encourage or ignore the budding comedic talent.

But please- no fart jokes.

36
Landscape / Re: Georgian Bay
« on: March 29, 2013, 09:11:01 PM »
RebelXT, kit lens, CP

37
Landscape / Re: Georgian Bay
« on: March 10, 2013, 04:48:02 PM »
shot with my RebelXT, can't wait to get back up there with my 6D...

38
Portrait / Re: A Portrait of Poverty . . .
« on: March 04, 2013, 07:07:04 AM »
Ivan- great photos, interesting blog. Thanks for sharing.

39
Canon General / Re: Canon 1D X on the Street
« on: February 13, 2013, 08:22:51 AM »
I'm currently in Caracas with only a crappy little P&S. I love taking my 6D on the road, but in a 15L Lowepro backpack- it's a third piece of baggage. With a legal carry-on size suitcase containing 4 days of clothing and a 2nd case for my professional gear- it's a either a gym bag with my running stuff or the camera as the third item, something's gotta give.

I may have to investigate a small mirrorless system.

40
6D Sample Images / Re: for those who snub the 6D AF...
« on: February 08, 2013, 05:24:19 AM »
Something recent, A340 rwy 10 CCS

41
6D Sample Images / Re: for those who snub the 6D AF...
« on: February 07, 2013, 09:16:50 PM »
As you know, much easier than opposite-direction traffic.

My last overseas position was B744F, last flight 2 weeks after 911, so still shooting film. That'd be a perfect airplane for north atlantic shots today since we cruised it at .86 and eventually passed everyone except Concorde and other 400s... Should be back overseas next year on the 787, this time with a DSLR.  :)

42
6D Sample Images / Re: for those who snub the 6D AF...
« on: February 07, 2013, 08:27:55 PM »
Here some shots.  Some of them taken with point and shoots.
Same direction of flight, NAT tracks?

43
6D Sample Images / Re: for those who snub the 6D AF...
« on: February 07, 2013, 06:42:17 PM »
Thanks, Carl. Your skills are an order of magnitude above mine.  ;)

Yes, I made a lot of the mistakes you mentioned, but- about panning- there really isn't time or room for that for an airplane traveling along a reciprocal track. If ATC mentions the traffic (more for interest, since separation is adequate if everyone's doing what they're supposed to be doing)- you won't actually see the aircraft until he's well inside 10 miles. That's less than 40 seconds from when he starts out as a hazy dot until he disappears over (or under) your windscreen. It's only the last 2 or 3 seconds that he's big enough in your field of view to produce a useable photo. You aim, you shoot, sometimes it works, most of the time it doesn't.

Crossing traffic is easier as is the organized track system over the Atlantic where everyone's stacked up and going in the same direction. (But I haven't flown either big ocean since before digital cameras were available to the masses.)

44
6D Sample Images / Re: for those who snub the 6D AF...
« on: February 07, 2013, 03:34:47 PM »
I just don't get why we keep discussing this. 

I'm the OP, and frankly, I'm sorry I posted the shot. It seems that CarlTN has a point about people not completely reading messages or conversely reading too much into a post. Once again- it was just me- an untalented, unsophisticated, amateur photographer celebrating the fact that the camera could do something I wasn't expecting it to be able to do based upon my previous experience with another Canon DSLR.

Holy Cow. Let it go.

45
Site Information / Re: Moderators: You are Too Sensitive
« on: February 04, 2013, 07:51:31 AM »


Indeed, and while I guess US law would apply to CR
Nope, CR is in Canada.   Those who post are responsible for their own posts, but the moderators try to make it a plesant place to carry on reasonable conversations about photography.
They even let some of the US citizens like Neuro and myself post here.  My son was born in Toronto and has a Canadian father, so I guess that makes me part Canadian - eh :)

...and my mom was born in Regina and is still a Canadian citizen

I bought my first non-kit lens in Regina, so we're practically brothers...

Actually, since it was only a Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 I, I guess I'm more of a backwards 2nd cousin, twice-removed- but still!!

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 17