6D + 70-200 mk.ii gets you what you want. AF may be less compared to 5d3, but for what you do it might even be better in low light... it has better high ISO, wifi, about 1800 cheaper... I'd get the 6D.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I don't like the slowpoke AF of the macro, compared to the 100f2. The 100f2 focusses instantly!
Yep - if you shoot indoor sports or the like, the extra stop and faster AF of the 100/2 make it a better choice.
I would prefer a 20-120 f/4 IS. Makes the 17-40 less necessary to get those wider angles.
Here is a shot I have been working on all day with the 100L
Para todos los Venezolanos 2 by CastilloPhotoDesign, on Flickr
I can read, I'm sure that it takes photos larger than 200 pixels.
compared to the latest sony sensors or a 4 year old CCD from fuji.