When do we get to see RAW footage?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I don't like the slowpoke AF of the macro, compared to the 100f2. The 100f2 focusses instantly!
Yep - if you shoot indoor sports or the like, the extra stop and faster AF of the 100/2 make it a better choice.
I would prefer a 20-120 f/4 IS. Makes the 17-40 less necessary to get those wider angles.
Here is a shot I have been working on all day with the 100L
Para todos los Venezolanos 2 by CastilloPhotoDesign, on Flickr
I can read, I'm sure that it takes photos larger than 200 pixels.
compared to the latest sony sensors or a 4 year old CCD from fuji.
@clostridium - not to be difficile , but while the 100-400 is slightly better in terms of IQ than the 70-200/2.8L IS II + 2xIII, it's not better enough to be significant in real-world shooting. (Note this applies to the MkII version of the 70-200 only.) I have them both, and the difference isn't great enough to warrant taking both white zooms, IMO.
There have been no upgrade rumors. Its not a fast selling lens, and is not easy to resell, .