Messages

31

EOS Bodies / Re: 1DX sample RAW images

« on: May 20, 2012, 08:28:10 AM »

I recently cancelled my 1DX pre-order, i can't decide which camera to replace the 5DII with. I still have just a 7D for now, so i'll wait for the 1DX to come out and be reviewed in production form before i decide to add a 5DIII to the 7D, or buy the 1DX and sell the 7D. Or maybe i'll wait to see what the specs are on the high MP offering coming in the future, or maybe i should wait for the 1DXII........

32

Lenses / Re: 5D MKIII w 70-200 2.8II using a 1.4x vs 2x extender

« on: May 17, 2012, 06:52:35 PM »

^^^^^ Plan on carrying a tripod then, the 400 F5.6 has no IS and being F5.6, it's a slow lens as well.

33

Lenses / Re: 5D MKIII w 70-200 2.8II using a 1.4x vs 2x extender

« on: May 16, 2012, 08:50:22 PM »

I own the same 70-200 lens as well as the 1.4 and 2x III extenders, and used them on my 7D and now sold 5DII. The 1.4 gives very sharp images at F/4 and even sharper images at F/5.6. The 2x gives very usable images as long as the subject you are focusing on occupies a good amount of the frame. The 2x really surprised me on the amount of detail in the image when you zoomed in to your subject on the 5DII, way better fine detail than you would see on the 7D. To me, if you buy them at the right time, you can get both for $900, and i feel each has a place and time where they will be useful. I would honestly recommend both, but the 1.4's strong point is slightly better IQ, and the 2's strong point is basically the noticeably longer reach with good IQ.

34

EOS Bodies / Re: tripod help for EF 600mm f4 IS USM?

« on: May 16, 2012, 08:19:55 PM »

I'd go on gitzo's site, they give full descriptions of their models, and what weight they will support as well as what lens is recommended for each tripod.

35

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon ID Mark IV availability?

« on: May 02, 2012, 09:30:34 PM »

Canon has them up on the refurb site right now for $3,999. Soooo tempting, but i think i'll keep waiting for my pre-ordered 1DX.

36

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II - Your thoughts

« on: April 30, 2012, 10:50:14 AM »

I will buy it because i don't have a zoom lens in that range, and have held off on getting one until the 24-70 II was announced. I have a 16-35, 50, 100, and 70-200, and also shoot with a 7D and a (sold now, being replaced by 1DX) 5D II. This lens sounds to be of equal or better IQ than my 70-200 2.8 IS II, so as much as i think the price is high, i think it will be worth it.

37

5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D Mark III with 100mm macro 2.8L

« on: April 29, 2012, 05:59:54 PM »

cognisys-inc.com has a system that i feel is affordable that aids you in taking photos of such things and more. Really neat stuff.

38

5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D mark iii & 100L - Heineken product shot

« on: April 29, 2012, 05:56:46 PM »

I'm thristy....

39

Lenses / Re: L lens vs Full Frame

« on: April 29, 2012, 08:32:17 AM »

I own a 7D, and just sold a 5DII. The 5DII blew the 7D away in IQ in my opinion. Going to a full frame body will make your 50 a bit wider than on your cropped body. It is tough to say, because both are a big step up in IQ (an L lens or a 5DII). Most will tell you to go with lenses, as they are a long term investment, but i think once you try a full frame body (the 5DII is an awesome camera and is priced right now that the 5DIII is out) you will love it. I'm going to go against the lens idea and recommend the 5DII to you. Get a good lens when you build up cash again and you will be amazed all over again, as an L lens on that body gives amazing IQ.

40

Lenses / Re: Lenses to shoot the Milky Way. Is a 17-40 enough?

« on: April 29, 2012, 08:23:16 AM »

A 14mm is a 14mm, if you are ok with a fixed focal length then it gets great reviews. But the 16-35 has alot of zoom range when you go from end to end while looking through the viewfinder, which may be a big benefactor in framing in your shot. I own a 16-35 (haven't had it long) and think it is a great lens, and is versatile being that it is both pretty sharp and can zoom. My personal opinion is go with the 16-35, 14 is very wide.

41

Lenses / Re: L lens vs Full Frame

« on: April 29, 2012, 08:18:09 AM »

You didn't post what lens you will be using on the 5DII. Will you keep the 50 1.4 and have that as your only lens?

42

Lenses / Re: best lenses for 7d

« on: April 29, 2012, 08:07:42 AM »

I own a 70-200 2.8 IS II and love it, but it is way above your price range you are looking at. Could you possibly try to get a 7D, 17-55, and a 70-200 F/4 IS all refurbished for your target price range? The F/4 version is no slouch, but won't let in as much light as the F/2.8 version ( but the F/4 version will be noticeably lighter in hand). That would be a good combo i think.

43

EOS Bodies / Re: Best technique for Micro Focus Ajustment

« on: April 28, 2012, 08:12:38 PM »

Nice write up, does the windows virtual machine require purchasing a windows os and running it on something like parallels? I am new to macs and am just trying to figure it's os out, so i haven't looked into integrating the windows on it (but i got a parallels program for free from b&h when i purchased the computer).

44

Lenses / Re: waiting for a new 100-400mm lens

« on: April 28, 2012, 07:24:13 PM »

Deterrent? More like a swift kick to the grapes!

45

EOS Bodies / Re: Best technique for Micro Focus Ajustment

« on: April 28, 2012, 07:04:02 PM »

It sounds to me like reikan foCal is the way to go, but you need windows (mac os not yet released). I haven't used it yet, but will as soon as the mac version comes out. I've seen many good reviews on this product.