January 31, 2015, 02:37:40 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wockawocka

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 28
286
EOS Bodies / Re: More new 5D MK III sample pics from Bert...
« on: March 05, 2012, 03:00:44 AM »

They look quite soft at 100% on the flickr set but thats probably due to no sharpening etc...


When 12800 ISO are you.... look soft you will hmm?

287
Yeah here's one, why are Canon always measuring ISO improvements based on Jpegs, which are compressed and usually put through the in camera noise reduction.

It's hardly a bloody measure of ISO performance is it Canon?

Same goes to Nikon.

288
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D Mark III Review by Jeff Ascough
« on: March 04, 2012, 03:57:47 AM »
But he's also Canon's best buddy and Ambassador.


289
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon 1V
« on: March 04, 2012, 03:55:31 AM »
The 1V is awesome, the Eos3 is very good. (I have both). But, the 1V is professional, feels professional and behaves professionally.

I do like the Eos3's shape though, reminds me of the 1980's.

290
I don't see prices changing too much. The 1D4 focuses at F8 and is almost the same price as the 5D3.

Can't see a reason for it to be cheaper.

291
EOS Bodies / Re: About the 1Dx?
« on: March 02, 2012, 05:45:38 PM »
I thought the 1DX had in camera HDR?

292
Canon did us a favour. I had 2 x 1Dx's on onrder, now I have a 1Dx, 5D3 and a 24-70 II instead.

293
EOS Bodies / Re: Hugely Disappointed In 5D III Price
« on: March 02, 2012, 01:51:03 AM »

Who cares about megapixels.  Seriously.  22 megapixels can make HUGE prints.  I'm glad the price has increased so that people who care about megapixels (non pros) won't buy this camera.

You Sir, have no idea what you are spewing. 

 MPs a extremely important to the studio and landscape crowd.  Landscape folks what better detail in big prints.  Studio folks want to satisfy clients needs for higher MPs so clients can crop as much as they want and still have enough MPs for a variety of uses.

In your mind MF folks using huge MP digital backs arent pros?

MF Folks, myself being one use a sensor 3 times the size of a 35mm DSLR. For certain portrait work I use a Leaf Aptus 22mp back from 2004, the pixel pitch is 9 microns and at ISO 50 it noticeably beats the 5D2, 1Ds3 and 1D4 for IQ.

I would never really consider a 40mp 35mm sensor. Not until a second generation version at least. Image quality is king and even with my 1Ds3 I've taken landscapes that print a meter wide.

High MP = Small pixels = not good for IQ

294
I had 2 1Dx's on order but the 5D3 has this over / the same as, the 1Dx:

Lighter, AF system practically the same, Higher MP

If it wasn't that I trusted pro bodies and their extra features more I'd probably cancel both orders and go purely 5D but I'll get one of each.

For weddings just how much 'noticeable' difference in IQ will the client see between both bodies?

295
4 stops in camera IS

296
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III Full Spec List?
« on: March 01, 2012, 08:54:40 AM »
It's a smaller 1Ds3 with video.

I did have 2 x 1Dx's pre ordered, now it's just 1.

How good does the IQ of the 1Dx need to be to make it worth taking over a cheaper, lighter, higher MP body?

Dual card slots and it can focus*.

*Subject to change

297
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Why all the hate for still camers?
« on: March 01, 2012, 04:40:43 AM »
I hardly use video but you can imagine the scenario if they did stills only and stills with video:

Say the 5D3 is released and it's $4000

Then we fly to an alternative universe where there are two models.

Without video = $4000
With = $5000

It's not being hated on at all, tbh I'd rather have an amazing stills camera than a bit of both but I don't think these days it takes that much extra tech to do video as well. So it gets included, then becomes a measure of a cameras quality because of it.

298
EOS Bodies / Re: The new 5D Mark III ?!?! PICS!
« on: February 27, 2012, 04:30:39 PM »
Usually my eyesocket covers the eyepiece when I take a shot. I always thought it was there for long exposures?

299
EOS Bodies / Re: 1D X Delay, Weight, Number of Shots ***Official***
« on: February 27, 2012, 03:24:33 AM »
F***

300
EOS Bodies / Re: DR and RAW bit depth on Canon's forthcoming...
« on: February 26, 2012, 02:04:20 PM »
I'm very surprised that Canon hasn't gone to 16 bits yet. I've been testing out an Aptus 22 back out and it blows away my 1Ds3 for IQ, but that's all it does.

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 28