April 17, 2014, 12:36:24 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - vlim

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
My dad got it with the eos 100d and the 40mm 2.8 pancake. It gives to him a fantastic, compact and very affordable kit for travel and everyday photo... I was very surprise how good is that lens !

EOS Bodies / Re: sotchi - canon prototypes
« on: February 18, 2014, 11:51:51 AM »
1Dx + 200-400 (lens hood less) what else ?

Lenses / Re: Most Anticipated Rurmored Sigma Lenses?
« on: February 10, 2014, 05:18:23 AM »
some new S lenses please ! the 120-300 2.8 is a great one so new lenses with higher focal range would be great... 400 f/ 4 or 4.5, 500 f/4 or 4.5 8)

Lenses / Re: Patent: Canon EF 70-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS
« on: February 04, 2014, 08:48:37 AM »
So many patents and just a few new lenses but not the ones we're expecting like a new 100-400, new 400... At least they 're searching for the right formula 8)

It looks very similar to the system made by f stop gear ;)

EOS Bodies / Re: A New Rebel for CP+? [CR1]
« on: January 15, 2014, 09:36:30 AM »
I know! One has all cross-type AF points, faster FPS, and even a faster flash sync speed !

Yes and the other one delivers terrific image quality and might be the best body of Canon in low light conditions... But anyway we need a new version of the 7D 8)

EOS Bodies / Re: A New Rebel for CP+? [CR1]
« on: January 15, 2014, 04:14:57 AM »
There already is a full frame rebel... it's the Canon 6D

The 6D is an excellent body way better than any Rebel body, you can't even compare !

Come on Canon we need a 7D mark II and not the annual new rebel body ; the 70D is already there, a damned good one for its price and you/we don't need another one at this point !

A new 100-400 or 400 4.5 or 5.6 with IS is severely needed too !!!

Lenses / Re: Patent: Canon EF 300-600 f/5.6 w/1.4x TC
« on: December 07, 2013, 04:10:41 AM »
Why? It's unlikely to be as good as the old 100-400 at 400, and probably much worse than a new 100-400mm II, and even less likely to be seen.

i don't see why ? the actual 70-300 f4-5.6 IS is way better than the 100-400 ! and the new 100-400 II still not exists and might never exists ;)

Lenses / Re: Patent: Canon EF 300-600 f/5.6 w/1.4x TC
« on: December 06, 2013, 03:00:11 PM »
Now they handle the technic, Canon might think about a line of zooms with built in converter

i would like to see a 70-300 f/4 IS with x1.4

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel SL1/Kiss X7 in White
« on: November 14, 2013, 08:58:27 AM »
I hate the look of that DF !

This white version will look great behind a 70-200 f/4 L (Is or not) ;)

let's see the price and the first samples. It looks like an inner zoom, isn't it ?

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Off Brand: Nikon Announces the Df
« on: November 06, 2013, 06:20:43 AM »
I don't like these kind of old school inspiration, i don't understand why going that way beside selling it to people who likes that kind of design... I hope Canon won't go that way, they have enough work on a top 7dII body !!!

Lenses / Re: Image of the New 100-400?
« on: October 24, 2013, 08:16:21 AM »
Inner zoom on this lens, don't you think ?

Canon General / Re: Official: Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS
« on: October 14, 2013, 01:47:08 PM »
I doubt its price will be higher than the Canon L one... It would not be a great marketing idea.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16