January 28, 2015, 04:25:12 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Halfrack

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 34
Instead of adapting for and purchasing a 105mm CPL, just get a 4x4 CPL from Lee or other mfgs...


Based on the end use, wouldn't doing a crop body or action camera be a lighter option?

Is the framing on the 24-70 what you want?  If so, try a heavier setup with a Glidecam or such.

Abe's of Maine, Samy's in California, Glazers in Seattle.  There are options, but they may not offer the same price point.

Software & Accessories / Re: Camera bag for camping
« on: July 21, 2014, 02:53:08 PM »
http://www.mindshiftgear.com/ ?  As Rusty is saying, start with your size, get a pack that will fit you, as you'll be able to carry more and be less fatigued with a properly fitting pack.  Figure out what you're carrying compared to who you're going with - and who is carrying what.

Where are you going, how far under foot power, what type of terrain and weather are you expecting, how many other folks are going?  A T3i with 2 lenses are better added to a traditional backpack than a special photo bag purchase.  Check out rental options on both types of bags, since you may not need the bag for another year or two and what you carry will change.

Lenses / Re: Camera setup for dental clinic
« on: July 15, 2014, 05:38:25 PM »
Looks like the 100mm non-L macro is what others are using


Software & Accessories / Re: Neutral Density Filters
« on: July 15, 2014, 07:33:48 AM »
I have both the Hitech and Lee kits.  The Lee has the hoods available, so if you're shooting out a glass window you can remove all the reflection that may crop up.  I started with the Hitech but needed to purchase it all again for the hood.  Lee also has the tandem adapter, so you can stack filters at different angles.

I get some of my filter stuff locally (gotta support the bricks) and they've got both, but I had to order in the 95mm adapter rings.  Which reminds me, I should have grabbed a reverse grad for this weekend.

Canon General / Re: Seeing Rebels....
« on: July 07, 2014, 06:12:08 PM »
It's common, I find myself looking when people watching.  I think there is something to be said by brand identity, but you're missing the biggest point - these people will not purchase a new camera for at least another 5 years.  How do I figure - look at all the silver rebel's out there.  Canon and Nikon are competing with themselves as there isn't a must have feature on any current dslr made - a T1i does video and that was 2009.  The old adage was to take your photos to the next step, the dslr body on Auto is better than a Point n Shoot.  No one says what you'll get by replacing it with anything better.

Lots of folks will talk your ear off about what they've been shooting or what they're brother in law has, but generally, the compact low end dslr has 99% of what these folks want.  Nothing you tell them will get them to upgrade, let alone get a lens other than the kit zoom(s).  All these cameras will hang from their OEM straps, sit in proudly labeled OEM bags, with a few hundred shots per year.  Folks don't really care if they can get bigger, cleaner, better images - they'll just take the memory card down to the local print shop and get some 5x7's and call it a day.

I worry that the slacking demand for low end cameras will adversely effect the development money that Canon and Nikon have going forward.

Lenses / Re: I'm looking at rentig/buying a new lens for weddings
« on: July 07, 2014, 01:37:41 PM »
Welcome Diane,

Give us a little more info as to what tools you're working with, and there are lots of options to consider.  Generally speaking, as stated above the 24-70 & 70-200 f2.8 zooms are the wedding workhorses - other lenses are used for specific looks or shots, but entire weddings are shot with just those two lenses every day.  If you can swing it, you won't regret investing the money into either of the 2nd gen of these lenses.

Depending on what you want, the 24-70 VC from Tamaron or the 85mm f1.8 or the 135mm f2 are all options that will work in dimmer locations.  Also consider the high ISO performance of the newer FF bodies (5d mk3/6d) may be your best place to put cash.

Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: to 600rt + st-e3 or not....
« on: July 03, 2014, 05:23:51 PM »
Reconsider what you're trying to accomplish.  Are you looking to add more light sources to a frame, or are you looking to add more power?  If the latter, you may want to look at the Einstein in the post above, or the Profoto B1.  Yes, they are more than what you're looking to spend right now, but both of them offer up a lot more power and light shaping options than ganging together more speedlites.

I would also point out that most folks don't do well selling 'packages' so break your gear into 3 parts, each lens, and the body with grip/battery.  Keep in mind refurb prices as selling at or above that level won't happen.  Otherwise, Craigslist has been good to me, took a bit longer to sell my 85mm 1.2L II than I thought, but it did sell.

Art Wolf was an Explorer of Light - one of their most famous ones at that, and he is no more since he picked up Phase One.

The branding that goes into the EoL program is heavy, and I can respect a photographer who uses the best tools available to them a touch more than one that just goes with any program.  If I was an EoL and wanted to use the Profoto TTL B1 flash, would I be able to?  What about a metallic paper from Moab that Canon doesn't make?

Heisler (an EoL) did the Boston Marathon 1 year photo on Canon, and I lost some respect for him for sticking with Canon for such a large group.  Yes, the photo was only printed at letter size, but to do it as a huge testament print would have been better.

Lenses / Re: World Cup started - no sign of 100-400L Mk2
« on: June 16, 2014, 01:21:59 AM »
Yea, the 1200mm is a lens that I would love to play with for about 30 minutes, but I don't think I'd want to pack one any distance.  The photo of the FD version with the TC over a guys shoulder on a beach pops to mind but I can't find it currently.  B&H had fun with the one they flipped for some serious cash - you have to wonder who would walk into a used department with one, and what they offered for it.

There isn't going to be a built-in TC in a consumer level L lens - the costs and expectations don't allow for it.  Would I like to see a TC in a new 800mm - sure, but then you're talking about a lens that would command any price they wanted.  Canon sells too many 100-400 lenses currently that to add in a TC would push the price up too high.  Add in the whole lack of f8 AF on the crop bodies, and you see where selling a lens that doesn't work on their entire lineup just doesn't make sense.  Plus it gives Tamron a great niche to sell their 150-600mm lens.

EOS Bodies / Re: Ye Olde Film Photography
« on: June 15, 2014, 11:25:52 PM »
There are reasons to pick up film, and it's a great way to challenge yourself.  Plus, film is the only cheap way to shoot larger than 35mm, and being able to 'chip' digitally, then shoot with medium format 6x45 or 6x7.  I'm taking some Fuji instant pack film and a Mamiya RZ camera for a beach excursion next weekend.

Lenses / Re: Filter for Tamron 150-600?
« on: June 12, 2014, 07:43:10 PM »
Reconsider if you want a UV filter.  Might be better putting that money into the polarizer you'll want anyways.  I love my B+W 95mm CP.

Get LR 5 as a boxed product now and you'll be fine.  Toss it on a shelf, and it'll last a few years easy - long enough that you'll have this same debate about LR6 / LR7.

You also have that 30 day trial fun if you want to give it a no-risk go.  Install today, see what gets announced on the 16th and then decide what you want to do.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 34