July 31, 2014, 03:59:53 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jlev23

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
16
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Magic Lantern on the 5D Mark III
« on: April 27, 2012, 12:12:23 PM »
POLL (hopefully the guys at Magic Lantern read this!!!)

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=6136.0

17
EOS Bodies - For Video / 5D Mark III Magic Lantern wish list poll
« on: April 27, 2012, 12:11:32 PM »
ok, i couldnt think of anything else id want for option 5, but all of the rest would be nice.
i think they are all possible, very possible.
thank you to the guys at Magic Lantern!!!

18
if anyone is getting soft images at this point then we know its human error...

20
EOS Bodies / Re: The Techradar Test of the 5D MK3
« on: April 26, 2012, 01:57:05 AM »


That is utterly, utterly, wrong. If for no other reason than the simple fact that the 5D Mark II is in no way worse than the 5D Mark III in terms of DR.

nothing wrong about it, i have far less dynamic range in my MK2. i did a photo shoot with both bodies, the proof is in the pudding.

21
EOS Bodies / Re: Will Apple Preview support 5D Mark III RAW files?
« on: April 25, 2012, 10:41:36 AM »
so it worked though?! at least thats another question under the bridge, guess im upgrading too.

22
Lenses / Re: Why is this soooooooo difficult.......
« on: April 25, 2012, 12:39:32 AM »
Canon's ef-s 10-22 is a good choice for your wider focal length needs.  I had it for my crop camera, and it worked well.  The range fits well with your 24-105.

The 70-200 II + 1.4x III works well IQ-wise but AF speed takes a noticeable hit.  The effect is most noticeable if the subject is moving directly towards/away form the lens (tracking).  You might have to experiment with your 7D settings (AF point expansion, etc.) to compensate (I use a 5DII).  If you really need the reach, it might be worth looking into the 100-400.  I'm waiting for version II, so I'm using the 1.4x III as a stop gap measure.
does the 10-22 cover full frame for a 5D???
looks like that could be a nice BMC lens too!
thanks!

23
EOS Bodies / Re: Will Apple Preview support 5D Mark III RAW files?
« on: April 24, 2012, 09:44:58 PM »
oh great, so i guess preview and i photo use the same drivers. damn, now i need to upgrade iphoto.

24
EOS Bodies / Re: Will Apple Preview support 5D Mark III RAW files?
« on: April 24, 2012, 08:49:46 PM »
aw man, i just checked my iphoto and its 8.1.2, apparently apple wants you to pay 15 bucks to upgrade iphoto now, wow.
i would do it if my preview works with 5D raw files. anyone know?

25
EOS Bodies / Re: 1DX to ship next month.
« on: April 24, 2012, 08:24:38 PM »
i heard august too, both 1D models.

26
EOS Bodies / Re: Will Apple Preview support 5D Mark III RAW files?
« on: April 24, 2012, 08:23:26 PM »
Have you installed Digital Camera Raw Compatibility Update 3.12?
i got this message when i tried to install it
"This update provides support for Aperture 3 and iPhoto 9 only."
then the only option is to hit close, and the install shuts down.

27
Has anyone noticed that their 5D MK3 isnt as sensitive as it perhaps should be?
Everytime I shoot with it I find I am going up a whole ISO range than I would have done on my first 5DMK1

I did a little comparison, same ISO, ƒstop, speed, and same exact lens between both bodies and my 5DMK1 produced a brighter image.

Anyone else out there with this issue?

interesting because the same thing is happenig with video. for instance take a D800 set it to 1/50shutter speed and ISO400 at f/2.8. do the same scene with the canon. The D800 footage will look a LOT brighter for the same exact settings. One could attribute it to the lens f/stop roudning, but I've seen the same phenomenon repeated with other lenses. It can't be a coincidence. My conspiracy theory is that canon is overstating ISO to look good on paper. I'm sure the truth will come out as more and more people test it and if an OEM is playing tricks, there will be a s**t brewing.
something must be wrong with your camera, because i posted the exact opposite a few weeks ago, i had d800 on my set and a MK3 and we did tests and i was surprised by how much darker the nikon was then the canon, i had to decrease the shutter on the nikon more then half to get the stop i was getting with the canon.
maybe you are on a not very well lit set or something. i was on green screen with 4 20ks and my canon was iso 640 f4 shutter 500, and i to get the same brightness out of the nikon d800 i had to be at a shutter speed of 160 to get it to be at the same exposure. so either i have a super camera or yours is having an issue. according to other posts i see, i think its the latter

28
EOS Bodies / Re: Will you send your 5D3 for light leak inspection?
« on: April 24, 2012, 12:31:28 PM »
i have a lens cap shoot today! what do i do? over expose by a stop? :)

29
it doesnt have a MAC LION version?????
There's a Snow Leopard version but no Lion.  What gives?
go to snow leopard and its says "mac x", i need to know how to install it though.

30
CONFIRMED!!!
There is something definitely wrong with your camera, because mine is exactly the opposite, the 5DMK3 is about 1/2 stop brighter, visually i can barely tell the difference, but the digital imaging tech on my job says according to the waveform the MK3 has about a 1/2 stop more sensitivity.
id return yours :)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10