May 21, 2013, 11:17:28 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Maui5150

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 21
16
Portrait / Re: Pretty bad...
« on: April 22, 2013, 01:14:14 PM »

... The bride really, really, really did not want to get her picture taken with the groom after the ceremony. 

Might  be completely out of context, but if I was a divorce lawyer, I would be circling this couple. 

17
Portrait / Re: Pretty bad...
« on: April 22, 2013, 09:42:34 AM »
but worth a lawsuit?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2312026/With-camera-I-thee-behead-Couple-Evette-Gary-Crack-sue-photographer-claim-ruined-big-day.html


Looking at the couple, they should be embarrassed.  Maybe put down the butter, cake, chips, beer, sweets, and like would have helped too.

The fact thay got that horse in a white tarp and made it look like a dress is an accomplishment though


Are you really serious with your comments?


Did you really have to ask?

18
Portrait / Re: Pretty bad...
« on: April 22, 2013, 07:25:24 AM »
but worth a lawsuit?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2312026/With-camera-I-thee-behead-Couple-Evette-Gary-Crack-sue-photographer-claim-ruined-big-day.html


Looking at the couple, they should be embarrassed.  Maybe put down the butter, cake, chips, beer, sweets, and like would have helped too.

The fact thay got that horse in a white tarp and made it look like a dress is an accomplishment though

19
Lenses / Re: I have just lost confidence with Canon Rumors & B&H
« on: April 17, 2013, 07:57:44 AM »
over reacting much?

+1

Those are pretty reasonable deals from arguably the most reputable dealer in the US.  I don't see the harm in reporting decent (albeit not great) deals.  Especially when many of us are always on the lookout for our next piece of glass.

Again, I got the lower price. That is not what this is about.

Good for you.  I got the 85mm f/1.2L II for $1,799 earlier this year, and you don't see me griping about losing confidence in this forum or B&H.  It's economics 101... Prices change on a daily basis.

Again, those are fairly reasonable prices, and I'm glad they were posted.  Be glad you already got a good deal and leave it at that.

Not one single person is listening to what I am saying. I GOT the lower price. My lens was paid for at the lower price & will arrive Thursday. I found it offensive that the price was marked up, hyped as lower, my post pointing this out was blocked. Do you all work for cr rumors & B&H? Or is there someone else that finds raising prices and advertising it as the best deal offensive?

Run out of Summer's Eve?

Whoop De Doo.  So you got a better price...  And you didn't. 

Secondly, I don't see the 24-70 listed in the lower price list posted on CR.  And here is a hint... Sometimes companies only put a FEW items on sale... I just put the lens in my cart and saw $2049.  Funny... That is the same price and not more expensive.

The Fish Eye for example is $100 less than other posted prices, and heck that is almost an 8% drop compared to the 2% you are bitching about. 

What about the 50 1.2?

Heck, even with the rebate, B&H is $100 less than Canon.

oh year... there is also a 2% reward and free shipping.


20
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 1DX Junk camera??
« on: April 11, 2013, 07:32:00 AM »
You want a Canon 5D MK II.

The 1DX is an awesome camera, but takes about 2 - 3 years for it to "break in" and finally get good shots. 

We could swap cameras?  I have a Cherry 5D MK II that is broken in nicely, takes awesome pictures, and don't mind waiting the 2 years for the 1DX to final take good shots.  I am sort of strange in that I like the break in process of new cameras.

I will even throw in a few spare lens caps

21
Regardless of what they tell you, this will NOT speed up your chickens.

There's an inherent bus issue with most chickens.

I disagree.  When I inserted this into a chicken's "bus" it speed up quite a bit faster... you might even call it overdrive mode.

Did make considerable much more noise though

22
Lighting / Re: Phottix Odins, monolights, and HSS
« on: April 02, 2013, 09:34:32 PM »

These are NOT my images. They were clearly taken by someone more talented than myself :) Nevertheless, I would like to emulate a similar effect, where the ambient light is almost entirely defeated during the middle of the day when it's properly bright outside. You read right. These shots were taken during the middle of the day, not at night. Over-powering the ambient in this fashion, then throwing some light on the subject, can yield some dramatic results.


NO WAY!!!!

Those shots were taken during the day?  Shocking!

23
Lighting / Re: Phottix Odins, monolights, and HSS
« on: March 29, 2013, 07:04:46 AM »

You might have to go with the Elinchrom power supplies.  Not sure which you are looking at, most I see from them are digital and if you are looking at the Vagabond Lithium Mini, it may not work for you as you think.

The Lithium Mini is really designed for analog monolights and because of the way it recycles, it creates issues with digital lights.  As an example, I cannot run my Photogenic PL2500DR or PL2500DRR off of the Mini... even just a single light, which technically the Vagabond should handle.

I can, however BARELY use the Vagabond with my PL1250DR, so only 500W/S versus 1000 W/S and even there only single light.

Now if I was using the PL1250 (Analog version) I should be able to power 2 fine. 

This is something to do with the inverter, the voltage drops during the recycle and the stable power needed by the lights.  The digital lights for the most part have a slightly higher requirement and at the bottom of the curve, the Vagabond is too low and "brownout" can be harmful to the digital components

You also notice all the Paul C Buff are analog.  Not a coincidence. 

Would be nicer if the Lithium had a little higher curve, but it is optimized for their line.

I hadn't considered the digital vs. analog issue, but I am now. Lots of people have experienced compatibility issues between newer variable voltage heads and the Vagabonds. The way I understand it, since heads like the Elinchrom 500 BXRi and Bowens Gemini Pros are designed to work with both 120v and 240v power outlets, the Vagabonds might have a hard time keeping up with the variations in voltage while the lights are recycling. The SE version of the Tronix Explorer battery pack was designed to address this issue, so that's probably what I'd go with if opting for the Elinchroms. Either that, or make a battery pack like wickidwombat's :)

Not sure how much the variable voltage heads play a part, I think it is more the sensitivity of the digital components to brown outs.

Can't remember where I saw the technical paper and details, but after firing, the (and can't remember if it is current) the drop of power is just below the required steady power many of the digital strobes require.  Some may be better than others.

I have also see other people who have tried recycle tests with some of the Elinchroms and while they do o.k. at lower power, once they boost up closer to full power, after firing they will throw E4 errors

With my photogenics, they are designed to discharge when powered off or when the wattage is decreased, so what I would see with the 2500s would be a fire, half charge, discharge, then full charge and they would be ready... in short, they did not like the current drop. 

My guess with the Elinchrom power and why it is more expensive, it has a larger and better power inverter as well as not sure if the added in some capacitors, or just maintain more current and thus have a lower drop from a firing

24
Lighting / Re: Phottix Odins, monolights, and HSS
« on: March 28, 2013, 06:53:15 AM »
I need to study up on the Elinchrom product line. Ideally I'd like more power than the D-Lite 400s, but then again, with HSS i could kill the ambient much more easily, which means I could open up the aperture more, which means I wouldn't need as much power in the first place. Hmmm.... The RX 600 heads are too expensive for my budget,  but very appealing.

I'd be tempted to try to run these off a Vagabond since the Elinchrom power supplies are so costly.

You might have to go with the Elinchrom power supplies.  Not sure which you are looking at, most I see from them are digital and if you are looking at the Vagabond Lithium Mini, it may not work for you as you think.

The Lithium Mini is really designed for analog monolights and because of the way it recycles, it creates issues with digital lights.  As an example, I cannot run my Photogenic PL2500DR or PL2500DRR off of the Mini... even just a single light, which technically the Vagabond should handle.

I can, however BARELY use the Vagabond with my PL1250DR, so only 500W/S versus 1000 W/S and even there only single light.

Now if I was using the PL1250 (Analog version) I should be able to power 2 fine. 

This is something to do with the inverter, the voltage drops during the recycle and the stable power needed by the lights.  The digital lights for the most part have a slightly higher requirement and at the bottom of the curve, the Vagabond is too low and "brownout" can be harmful to the digital components

You also notice all the Paul C Buff are analog.  Not a coincidence. 

Would be nicer if the Lithium had a little higher curve, but it is optimized for their line. 


25
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: DxOMark trashes the Leica M9 sensor
« on: March 13, 2013, 08:16:39 AM »
Further proof of the irrelevance of DxOMark scores. 

26
Portrait / Re: Fashion Girl picture test with Dynalite Ringflash 3200w
« on: March 11, 2013, 02:46:33 PM »
Oooooo.  :o  Fancy...

How's the color compare to the AB-Ring flash?

Does color matter?  This is analogous to comparing a 7D to a 1Dx

i.e. Dynalite around $2K or more and the AB at $400

Color matters. Generally all analog studio strobes color shift @ different power levels. ABs are terrible offenders and simply asked how a 2K dynalite performs.

Not arguing that... Arguing does it really matter since the comparison merits a 500% price difference. 

27
Portrait / Re: Fashion Girl picture test with Dynalite Ringflash 3200w
« on: March 11, 2013, 01:34:39 PM »
Oooooo.  :o  Fancy...

How's the color compare to the AB-Ring flash?

Does color matter?  This is analogous to comparing a 7D to a 1Dx

i.e. Dynalite around $2K or more and the AB at $400

28
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR1]
« on: March 08, 2013, 08:33:14 AM »
The "pro" APS-C side sounds quite interesting. I wonder how the current "non-pro" 7D owners would think of the price difference.

And so what is your point?

The non-Pros can go into the xxD line or the xxxD line depending on their preference.

Canon's line up makes a lot of sense to me.

At the top you have the 1D? line.  1Dx sits at the top with the split of the 1D and 1Ds lines doing the branching between Studio  and ISO/Performance.

next level has been a 5D/7D split  5D for FF / portraits (more of a mini 1Ds) and the 7D aimed more at sports / landscape and their top Crop Sensor.

Heck in the Canon World, know a lot of pros who went with the 5DMKII and the 7D

Makes sense that we have a 1Dx and perhaps a 1DxS coming out to continue the performance / larger mega pixel split , and then 1 level down a 5D MKIII and a 7D MKII or 7Dx perhaps. 

For those little more price conscious, there is the 6D or the 60D, or 70D perhaps. 

Would not surprise me that Canon would look at the original 7D see it as a solid, but not quite pro camera and decide to step it up to really make it more of a Pro - King of the Crop in their line up on par with the 5D line just slightly less since it is crop and then let the Prosumers focus on the xxD line or have the 6D

Really seems to me that the 7D is being split into two flavors, the 6D which is really just a small update to the 7D and then the 7Dx or 7D MKII which is more of the pro upgrade to the 7D

29
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR1]
« on: March 07, 2013, 09:49:13 PM »
The assumption that the 7D will have an integrated grip based on this tidbit of information is hilarious. Could it be that they're just hinting on a newer, smaller, battery with a slightly higher voltage? Come on, the LP-E6 is a good battery but it's also been out for quite awhile now =P

You have the support and detail backwards...

Reading what was posted.... the variation in the wild has an integrated grip... and the info about the battery is support, perhaps causation, and most likely conjecture.

It is not "Hey, it will use larger batteries... Wonder if they will need more room, i.e. integrated grip"

30
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR1]
« on: March 07, 2013, 10:56:33 AM »
Hmmm, this does sound quite interesting.  It sounds like this camera will be positioned to have better features than the 5D3 just with a crop sensor.  If it is using the 1D battery it will have to have a 1D body.  Add the extra FPS and (Hopefully) a sensor that can cope with low ISO noise, I cannot see canon pricing this less than the5D3.  I am guessing it will come in right around $3,500.  That way most of us will complain about the price but they will still be sold out for months anyway because all of the sports and bird photographers will line up to put in their orders.  Then like the 5d3 the price will come down to more reasonable ($2,800 street price with occasional $2,500 sales) levels.

You can already get the 5DMKIII for just a little over $2500

Has Canon ever prices a higher number series more than a lower number? 

i.e. in the 1D > 5D > 7D chain and same down to the 60D etc

My guess is the FPS will be around 10, the ISO useable at 6400 and and 12800  / 25600 expansion giving the 5DMKIII a little better ISO and the 1Dx faster fps and more ISO

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 21