December 22, 2014, 07:18:17 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Maui5150

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 34
256
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon 5D Mark III vs Nikon D800
« on: April 05, 2012, 10:37:03 AM »
I think you are missing the real point which is the Nikon D4 versus the Canon 5D MKIII.

When I upsize images from the D4 to equal the 22MP of the 5DMKIII I notice that the D4 images are softer and have more noise.  I also notice the D4 is crap for detail when compared to the 5DMKIII at 22 MP...

Go figure...

The question is not D800 versus 5DMKIII, it is 5DMKIII versus the D4 and why when you upsize the D4 images to match the resolution of the 5DMKIII, the little camera that is almost half the price of the D4 has sharper and much more detailed pictures.

Go figure.

257
Lighting / Re: 580ex II or 600EX-RT
« on: April 04, 2012, 11:37:52 AM »
I wonder if somehow those triggers could trigger studio strobes?

If Canon release a RF receiver for their non-RF flashes to work with the ST-E3/600EX-RT system, then possibly that could be used to trigger a studio strobe via PC sync cable.  But until then, that's the main reason I'm sticking with PWs - the ability to trigger both Speedlites (via FlexTT5s) and a PCB Einstein (via PowerMC2).

I will one up you there... my PW fires my strobes, as does my light meter.  Most days all I need is my MiniTT and then a Flex for the occasional times I use a speedlight

258
EOS Bodies / Re: Thoughts of Gizmodo today - pretty balanced
« on: April 03, 2012, 11:35:04 AM »
The funny part of Kai's review was him waiting for the Nikon to write from buffer after a burst. 

As for the file size, it is what it is.  The D800 will fill up hard drives a lot quicker, as well, depending on your back up solution, those will get pressed a lot quicker too, especially if you prefer to have 3 points of failure

For folks doing landscape and large images, I am sure it is a dream.  For someone shooting fashion and models , and doing a few hundred shots over a couple of hours, maybe not so much.

259
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III & Possible 1D X Issue With PocketWizards
« on: March 29, 2012, 04:34:07 PM »
Have you updated your PW Mini TT1 for the 5D MKIII???

Do they have this available for the Mini yet?

You have to configure both the Flex and the Mini via the USB to set the camera up.

I got the exact same results when I first got my 5D MKII...

Why?

Because my mini was still set to my T2i.

Yup.... Went through the same thing... I thought I had a bad 5DMKII... or that my 5DMKII had to shoot at 1/160 or 1/100...

Ah...  Configuration.

Right now I don't think PocketWizard has an update firmware yet:

http://www.pocketwizard.com/products/transmitter_receiver/36/TT1-C/compatibility/


260
EOS Bodies / Re: DXO vs Reality
« on: March 29, 2012, 08:46:19 AM »
...
For me it was not so much the Nikon D800 score, but it was that score relative to other cameras I know to be better and more capable.  If you go by DxO, the D4 and D3s are S___e compared to the D800 which is just not true.  Then when you throw the whole MF quality into the mix... Yes, the MFs may bot be designed for High ISO per se, but does beg to question the ability to quantitatively measure IQ

Then don't look at the score, look at the signal to noise ratio, colour depth, tonality and dynamic range graphs individually to see how the D800 scores relative to those other cameras. The thing is, DxO didn't give the D800 for one attribute alone, it was from many.

If you compare the DR of the D800 to any other DSLR, you'll find that at ISO under 400, and especially ISO 100, it has no competition.

Quote
To me this diminishes the value of DxO since they are telling me a new BMW outperforms a new Ferrari

That's not unheard of.

Just because a new Ferrari is new does not mean it is as good as or better than any other car.

Quote
Is the D800 a better camera than the D4?  DxO says it is by a big margin.

DxO doesn't measure/score "camera", it scores "sensor." Thus DxO ranks camera based on sensor and sensor alone. For some people that will make it a better camera than the D4, for some it will not.

Your making my point.  Sorry.  The sensor in the d800 is not leaps and bounds over that of the D4.

I know that.
Nikon knows that.
DxO tests can't figure that out.

Despite what DxO is trying to tell me, Rosie O'Donnell is still fat and not more attractive than Olivia Wilde. 

Fact.  Not Opinion. 

261
EOS Bodies / Re: DXO vs Reality
« on: March 29, 2012, 07:52:09 AM »
I did mention a few times prior to D800 testing that DxO suggested Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS mark 1 was sharper than mark 2. Even after forum complaints there  that the results could not be correct, DxO maintained that there was nothing wrong with the results.

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/News/DxOMark-news/Canon-EF-70-200mm-f-2.8L-IS-II-USM-measurements-and-review

This is probably the only source that suggests mark 1 was sharper than mark 2. I am not suggesting DxO is necessarily biased, but something does not seem right. Perhaps their testing just does not have enough coverage to give a realistic picture?

Either case, I look at their figures but never rely on them for any purchase...

Cheers!

A couple thoughts come to mind...

For me it was not so much the Nikon D800 score, but it was that score relative to other cameras I know to be better and more capable.  If you go by DxO, the D4 and D3s are shite compared to the D800 which is just not true.  Then when you throw the whole MF quality into the mix... Yes, the MFs may bot be designed for High ISO per se, but does beg to question the ability to quantitatively measure IQ

In someways reminds me of CDs versus LPs, and while "Digital" is supposed to capture and be so reproduceable, the audiophiles still find magic in the outdated LPs for sound quality. 

Not to bring film versus digital back in the mix, but I do think that it is possible to produce a camera that "tests" well but whose IQ to the eye does not meet with the same judgement. 

To me this diminishes the value of DxO since they are telling me a new BMW outperforms a new Ferrari

Is the D800 a better camera than the D4?  DxO says it is by a big margin. 

You can tell me Rosie O'donnell is hotter than Olivia Wilde, I'll say you just have a thing for fat chicks who aren't funny

262
EOS Bodies / Re: Ken Rockwell Updated 5D MK3 Review
« on: March 29, 2012, 07:40:11 AM »
Chase Jarvis is a well-known Canon-basher, as was the not-quite world-renowned Jared Polin (FroKnowsPhoto) until he actually started getting his hands on Canon gear.

I can't think of an instance where Jared has bashed Canon and meant it. He does the Fro Vader thing every now and then, but purely in fun. The 5D mkIII has actually inspired him to purchase one and possibly the Canon "Hebrew Trinity". I don't know about Chase Jarvis though. I always figured that Nikon pays him some sort of advertising fee to talk about how awesome Nikon is. That being said, I just saw a poster today of Ashton Kutcher (sp?) slinging Nikon rather than Rebels, so maybe he's right  ::) Out with the old, in with the new. Right Ashton?!

Ah Beavis... When did Kutcher EVER sling Canons?  Jackie Chan was the celeb for Canon... Kutcher has and is for Nikon. 

I like Jared Polin... His FroKnows stuff is pretty good and I think once people become "invested" in one camp or another, their is a natural bias that forms. 

263
I think the biggest issue so far as I can reason

-- DPP software appears to be buggy
-- Adobe CameraRaw is not quite available yet.

DPP I blame on Canon, and it does look like from comments that I have seen, the previews are tack sharp, but processed looks softer, so that tells me it is software processing.  Shame on them.

On ACR, to be expected.  New cameras, especially ones that have been well guarded take a while to make it into releases.  Adobe Lightroom 4, for example does not play nicely with the NIK plug-ins that worked fine under Adobe LR3, so like anything else... Software upgrades as well as hardware upgrades often take time to synch.

Can be frustrating... Especially when something is new and you want to kick the tires.

Then again, from announcement to release, the MKIII was pretty darn fast.  People are still waiting on the 1Dx which was announced much earlier.

May be too soon to tell, but I expect once ACR7 is released, which may not be until Photoshop 6 is out and DPP is updated and people can process the Raw in their normal workflows, then things will calm down a bit. 

Canon missed a step with DPP, but we will see how quickly this is responded to

264
Lenses / Re: Patent: Canon EF 2.8x Teleconverter
« on: March 27, 2012, 09:54:36 AM »
so the 70 - 200 F/2.8L IS II becomes a 196 - 560?

While F/8 is not ideal, still might add in some use.  The TCs already slow the AF down as it is, so manual focus is not as much a big deal.

Not sure the price... Probably somewhere in the $600 - $800 range, but if it works with the 70-200 like the 2x does, I could see there being interest

265
The biggest thing I took from the article is the D4 is a piece of junk.  Nikon should be ashamed for selling and overpriced d400 marked and sold as a D4.

Accordingly, the D3s also appears to be an over priced POS...

at least that is what the DxOMark score says...

So the bigger question... What does that say about the DxO scoring and testing...

266
Coming from someone who shoots with three 550EXs, and is about to shell out big bucks with multiple 600EXs and an ST-E3, I'm certainly not doing it to save money over a proper monolight setup! I'm on location for 90 percent of my shoots, and using off-camera flash in 90 percent of those shots. The portability, the lack of cords, the lack of a power supply, quick setup time, and precise ETTL metering is why the Speedlites suit my needs most of the time. However, they are by no means a substitute for a set of real monolights in a studio environment. If you need to light up a large subject with fast recycle times, you need a set of monolights.

Speedlites can work just as well as monolights in certain situations, but you pay a hefty premium for the added portability. IMHO, Speedlights and monolights are merely different tools for different situations. One isn't necessarily as substitute for the other, and arguing that one is better than the other is silly.

Never said it was.

The title of this thread is "Pocket Wizards Plus III - what am I missing here?" and there is a general theme that since it does not have e-TTL it is crap, where in many of the cases enumerated, not only do these hold their own, but are cheaper and preferred. 

And agreed, both speedlites and monolights have different advantages and uses, and depending on ones needs and uses, certain features will be more valuable than others. 

267
Cameta is so-so.

I got my 24-105 F/4 L from them.

Things I learned from my transaction that they "don't tell you"

** They make most of their money from "unbundling" items.  They will by the kits and then sell the items separately.  Nothing wrong with this, but just be sure you know what you are getting, so if your order arrives in just a plain white box, don't be surprised. 

** It is not uncommon to be missing the warranty card, especially with the lenses.  I had no problem registering mine with Canon, but then again, sometimes you find out AFTER THE FACT whether a warranty will be honored or not. 

** Not sure if you got the HARD SELL... But they will try and sell you a ton of accessories, cards, cases, etc. 

** ONLY go with NEXT DAY or EXPRESS SHIPPING.  Their standard shipping DOES NOT include tracking, and you should always getting tracking with better items, especially if you need to sign for it. 

Would I buy from them again?  Maybe.  Depends on price... But I know with them generally not to expect a retail box and get a hard sell. 

268
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Gutted! (5DMkIII Adorama Bundle)
« on: March 21, 2012, 11:07:26 AM »
Point being blame the COUNTRY not the manufacturer. 

While gas prices in the US have soared, most of that is really a devaluation of the currency, and not the price of gas.  You can thank the Quantitative Easing for that.

The point with price of cameras in UK has to do with UK, corporate taxes, import taxes, etc.  and if you look at the cost of most if not all durable goods that are imported, you will see that most, if not all are MORE EXPENSIVE. 

269
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Gutted! (5DMkIII Adorama Bundle)
« on: March 21, 2012, 05:55:53 AM »
Before blaming Canon, Blame your country.

How much do you pay for gasoline per gallon?  Even though the US has soared as of late still cheaper.

By a motorcycle in the US like a Suzuki or even a Ducati... In the states you will pay $3,000 - $6000 less.

See a trend? 

270
For one, you are probably better off selling on Amazon in many ways.  I have dealt far too many times with eBay and PayPal than I care to recall, and as a Top Rated and Silver Power Seller, I have seen the site go to crap.

As well, there are a few annoying changes coming forward that can increase the final value fees on many sellers by as much as 450%

Yes... that is 450%.

The feedback process is incredibly skewed now, and sellers are in a real bad spot if you are not careful.  In short EVERYTHING needs a tracking number, and if it is above $250 it needs a signature.  You can have delivery confirmation... Does not matter if it is above $250, the buyer can receive it, as long as they do not sign for it, file a claim and you will get charged back.

Also be forewarned, Ebay and PayPal have been pushing hard on the BillMeLater.  Do note, that the Buyer Protection under this is COMPLETELY different.  I had an "Item not as described" which would have been fully covered under eBay/PayPal that was not under BillMeLater. 

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 34