July 22, 2014, 06:30:21 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lee Jay

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 43
196
EOS Bodies / Re: What's Next from Canon?
« on: February 14, 2014, 10:52:00 PM »
When it comes to base ISO (where most people shoot most of their photos),....

?????

16.9% of my SLR shots are at base ISO, 3% fewer than are at ISO 1600.

197
Pricewatch Deals / Re: New Canon EOS, PowerShot & Ring Lite Preorders
« on: February 12, 2014, 09:21:36 PM »
#2 - Ring flash, what size lens does this fit? I know the old one needed an adapter to fit on the 100L... will this?


Maybe this can help you.

http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/product/accessories/mr_14ex_ii_macro_ring_lite.do

198
PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot G1 X II Final Specifications
« on: February 11, 2014, 10:33:07 PM »
I'm always amazed that people care about how a camera looks.  It doesn't take pictures of itself.

I could see an ugly man, robot, or senior citizen not caring about how his camera looks, but I'm sure any young, good looking, senstive man wants his camera to be as sexy as he is. lol

How good a product looks plays a big role in what most people buy.  I'm no different and expect my camera and lenses to pretty sexy and modern looking.  Not becuase I think other people will have any sort of appreciation for the contraption in my hand, but becuase I have an eye and appreciate beauty, so natually I buy stuff I am attracted too. 

I am amazed there are people who either have no visual attraction to what they spend their money on, or spend their money on things they are not visually attracted to.  lol

I think anyone that thinks a camera can be beautiful hasn't seen anything beautiful before.

199
PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot G1 X II Final Specifications
« on: February 11, 2014, 07:04:10 PM »
Ugly camera - not because its "look" - but because it looks a huge step backward in usability compared to the G1X. No dials and a touch screen?

It has two front control dials.  My guess is that at least one, if not both are programmable.

200
PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot G1 X II Final Specifications
« on: February 11, 2014, 11:14:41 AM »
From the pics, it is 12.5mm at its widest. If this were 24mm, then we are looking at a crop factor of 1.92.

Working backwards, you will get the following sensor dimensions:

Diag: 22.5 mm
WxH: 18mm x 13.5mm
Area: 243mm2

This means this sensor is halfway between the old 1.5" and the m43 sensor. i.e. It has about 8% smaller surface area than 1.5" and about 8% bigger area than the m43.

This matches the mpx count as well. The G1X sensor was 14.3mpx. The mark II is about 8% less at about 13.2mpx.

I think it's the same 18.7mm x 14mm sensor, just used as 18.7mm x 12.5mm in 3:2 mode and as a little narrower in 4:3 mode.  So, you're always cropping a few sensor pixels.

201
PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot G1 X II Final Specifications
« on: February 11, 2014, 11:12:44 AM »
This camera is horrendous looking but what is the sync speed?

I'm always amazed that people care about how a camera looks.  It doesn't take pictures of itself.

If you like ugly looking expensive niche market P&S slow lensed cameras, be my guest. Just don't expect everyone will agree with you.

It's f/2 at the wide end, which isn't exactly slow, and how does any of this relate to the one topic I mentioned - it's looks?  I just don't see why anyone cares at all for how a camera looks!

202
PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot G1 X II Final Specifications
« on: February 11, 2014, 10:59:33 AM »
This camera is horrendous looking but what is the sync speed?

I'm always amazed that people care about how a camera looks.  It doesn't take pictures of itself.

203
PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot G1 X II Final Specifications
« on: February 11, 2014, 10:58:22 AM »
So the same size sensor - 1.5" - but slightly lower resolution compared to the Mk I ?

Probably the same sensor with a slightly smaller imaging circle (something Panasonic used to advertise as a multi-aspect-ratio sensor, trying to claim a fault as a feature).

204
PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot G1 X II Final Specifications
« on: February 11, 2014, 10:20:02 AM »
I'd love to see the dimensions.  This camera is far more interesting to me than the G1X was.

205
PowerShot / Re: More Images of the PowerShot G1 X Mark II
« on: February 11, 2014, 10:04:14 AM »
Actually, how about this.

The original G1X sensor is 18.7mm x 14mm, which is 4:3 aspect ratio.  What if this one is 18.7mm x 12.5mm for 2:3 aspect ratio.  The horizontal crop factor is 36mm/18.7mm = 1.925.

1.925*12.5mm = 24mm
1.925*62.5mm = 120mm

So, I'm guessing the sensor is the same horizontal dimension as the G1X, but 3:2, making this camera specified at 24-120mm equivalent.

Someone on DPReview found a spec sheet that essentially says both are true - it's a 4:3 sensor but the lens image circle doesn't cover the whole thing.  So, in 3:2 mode, it's actually as I said above.  In 4:3 mode, it's narrower and taller.

This is one way to make the lens smaller and faster - give it a smaller image circle.

EDIT:  And now the final specs posted confirm this.

206
PowerShot / Re: More Images of the PowerShot G1 X Mark II
« on: February 11, 2014, 09:51:32 AM »
Actually, how about this.

The original G1X sensor is 18.7mm x 14mm, which is 4:3 aspect ratio.  What if this one is 18.7mm x 12.5mm for 2:3 aspect ratio.  The horizontal crop factor is 36mm/18.7mm = 1.925.

1.925*12.5mm = 24mm
1.925*62.5mm = 120mm

So, I'm guessing the sensor is the same horizontal dimension as the G1X, but 3:2, making this camera specified at 24-120mm equivalent.

207
PowerShot / Re: More Images of the PowerShot G1 X Mark II
« on: February 11, 2014, 09:44:49 AM »
The sensor is smaller than the original G1X, ....
I don't think so.
If the sensor is not smaller than the G1X original, so the lens is 12.5 mm ultra wide angle. That would be unlikely. I bet the sensor is 4/3 as Olympus and Panasonic.

The original sensor was 1.85 crop as specified by Canon.  If this one is the same, that's about 23mm at the wide end.  The S120 is 24mm, as are many other compacts.  I agree with what was said above - Canon will probably call this 24-120, just like the S120.

208
PowerShot / Re: More Images of the PowerShot G1 X Mark II
« on: February 11, 2014, 09:33:02 AM »
The sensor is smaller than the original G1X, ....

I don't think so.

209
PowerShot / Re: More Images of the PowerShot G1 X Mark II
« on: February 11, 2014, 09:18:52 AM »
So, in essence, it's a larger-sensor S120, right?

210
PowerShot / Re: More Product Confirmations for CP+
« on: February 10, 2014, 08:43:15 PM »
The SX50 is 215mm at f/6.5.  That's 215/6.5 = 33mm of aperture.

This specs for the SX70, assuming the same sensor size, are about 358mm at f/8, which is 358/8 = 44.8mm of aperture.

That's a pretty big increase in real, optical aperture.  I wonder if the lens and camera are even bigger yet.

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 43