1
Reviews / Re: Can we have a 16-35 2.8L II review next please?
« on: June 15, 2013, 11:43:57 AM »Replacement of 16-35 II L = 16-35 III LIn my opinion we need a fast replacement for the 17-40L and 16-35 II L with an image quality like the 24-70 II L.
And that would be 12(14)-24 f/2.8?
12(14)-24 f/2.8 = new lens (welcome of course but still new lens, not a replacement)
Some people replace their 16-35 2.8 II with a 12(14)-24 f/2.8. For them, that's a replacement
