« on: September 23, 2014, 06:51:10 AM »
I hope I'm not high jacking this thread ... It's gone way too scientific for me to comprehend fully despite trawling tHrough the posts.
Would it be a reasonable conclusion to draw that at low ISO (100-400), the difference between the APS-C and the FF is negligible, thereby meaning that the reach benefit could be satisfactorily obtained at the low ISOs?
There is always a difference. It may only be negligible for those who don't care.
Thanks. What differences would be obvious and what would be the ones you would look for? Again, I'm talking only of low ISO.