January 28, 2015, 01:45:04 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Harv

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 18
While some wait for the price of a new camera or lens to drop a couple of hundred dollars, I'm out using and enjoying mine.  Well worth it.   ;D

EOS Bodies / Re: Using full frame lens on crop body cameras ?
« on: December 14, 2014, 02:54:47 PM »
I watch Tony Northrup vidoes for only one reason..... entertainment.  They are always good for a laugh.   ;D

Lenses / Re: 100-400 II - first shots
« on: December 11, 2014, 08:23:44 PM »
Congrats.  It looks pretty good from here.  Seems to take the TC well.  Keep them coming.

Hoping mine arrives next week

Lenses / Re: Tamron 24-70 or Sigma 24-105?
« on: December 11, 2014, 12:23:37 PM »
You should know that Sigma has apparently stopped production on the 24-105 f/4 lens.  This may not bode well for the future availability and service......  http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=23874.0

Lenses / Re: Tamron 24-70 or Sigma 24-105?
« on: December 11, 2014, 06:14:04 AM »
You don't have the Canon 24-70 f/4L IS on your list but that's the one I would be taking a hard look at.  Very sharp lens and no compatibility issues with present or future Canon bodies.

For Canadian websites we might not even get any shipping until January... *goes to cry in a corner*
(this is for the 100-400 II)

I just got off the telephone with my dealer (one of Canon's largest in Canada) and here is what I got.....

They have been informed by their Canon Canada rep that the warehouse will be releasing shipments to the dealers after the 12th. That is the most up-to-date information at this time.

I'm hoping that means early next week in my hands.

Landscape / Re: Within Forests
« on: December 01, 2014, 09:08:46 PM »

Landscape / Re: Within Forests
« on: December 01, 2014, 09:07:21 PM »

Reviews / Re: Lens cap review: (Exploding) Hama 77mm lens caps
« on: November 30, 2014, 09:23:34 AM »
I suspect this is the result of Hama using inferior material.

EOS Bodies / Re: Another 50mp FF DSLR Mention [CR2]
« on: November 27, 2014, 04:40:00 PM »

For even less money Nikon cameras give you more. This is quite simple. Just look at all the examples on line of severely underexposed pictures with the last d810 or d750 and how they can handle a 3-5 stops push.

Well, that's great news for a photographer with the skill level that constantly underexposes images 3-5 stops.  :D

Sorry, I just had to.

Photography Technique / Re: Share 3x your own advice to yourself!
« on: November 27, 2014, 06:42:42 AM »

Be there.

Remember to press the shutter button.

Canon General / Re: Does Canon really deserve this?
« on: November 24, 2014, 02:58:44 PM »
Any company that tries to be 'all things' to 'all people' would soon be 'all broke' and 'all gone'.

From my viewpoint with a background in marketing, Canon is undoubtedly far better equipped to research and determine what the market wants than any individual posting on this forum.  They have global assets and access to market trends throughout the world.  Do any of us?  I hardly think so.

In recent years I have purchased Nikon and Fuji, in addition to my Canon gear thinking some of their products might serve me better.  I did not find that to be the case.  I take approximately 35,000 - 40,000 images per year in some very demanding environments.  My Canon gear delivers everything that I need.  Are they perfect.  Hell no.  But then neither am I and neither is anyone else out there.  On balance, I find them to be the best for my needs.

I didn't buy into a Canon camera or Canon lens.  I bought into the Canon system and the Canon product development philosophy.  I'm sure many photographers also bought into the same with Nikon.

All that to say that in my opinion either of those companies can satisfy the needs of 99% of the photographers that walk this earth.

Remember that often times a company that appears to be on the 'leading' edge, is actually on the 'bleeding' edge.

Just one man's opinion.   ;D

Lenses / Re: 400mm thoughts
« on: November 17, 2014, 02:18:06 PM »

The MTF's on the new 100-400 @ 400 are substantially better than the 400 5.6 prime which is a pretty sharp lens.  In fact, the charts say it's substantially sharper even with the 1.4x and 2x tele's attached. Didn't expect to see that. If it focuses quickly and tracks well I may have to retire the prime.

I put one of these on pre-order the morning it was announced.  Based on the published MTF charts, I fully expect it to be sharper.  Like you, I'm looking forward to evaluating the AF speed and accuracy and if it turns out to be fast, my 400 f/5.6 will become redundant.

Lenses / Re: 400mm thoughts
« on: November 16, 2014, 11:29:14 AM »
I owned and used the 400 f/4 DO Mark I for a couple of years, having purchased it new.  For me the advantage was obviously the IS and 1 stop faster, plus being able to use a 1.4TC on it.  I no longer own the lens.

I have owned a number of copies of the 400 f/5.6L and still own one today.  In my opinion, the 400 f/5.6L is noticeably sharper at any aperture, and the lens is lighter.  The downside is the need for faster shutter speed.

Having said all that, the MTF charts on the 400 f/4 DO Mark II look to be outstanding and I suspect this new version will be much sharper than either of the above two lenses.  If it wasn't so dang expensive, I'd consider buying it.

Another lens worth looking at, in my opinion, is the new 100-400 that will be available in late December.  The MTF charts on that look great also, plus the latest IS.

Lenses / Re: Field review of the new Canon 100-400
« on: November 15, 2014, 08:45:00 PM »
The picture in his article with him holding it is the first time I've caught the fact that it still has a barrel that moves in and out thus still making this lens a potential for sucking in dust and moisture like the old version that I have. That's a disappointment. I thought I read somewhere here that it didn't do that and it was a more "balanced: lens since it wouldn't change it's centre of gravity when zoomed in.

I have one of the new versions on pre-order.  Having said that, I've had 4 copies of the original and never had one that "sucked in dust and moisture".  I was just never able to find a sharp copy which is why I don't own one now.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 18