This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
To me, it's about the lenses.... MF has a much wider field of view than Ff, which has a much wider field of view than APSC.
How can a format (without a specified lens) have FOV? Does MF has something wider than 12mm on FF?
Look at sport photography.....see all those people with the FF cameras and the 600mm lenses? With an APSC camera you can get the same field of view with a 400mm lens, but at the cost of image quality. A MF shooter would need a 1500mm lens to get the same field of view, but would have superior image quality. Obviously, this is not practical and MF will never fit this segment of the market.
Maybe they plan on bigger for MF ---something in the 80mp range. If they can make 50 mp FF sensors, then 80 + mp mf sensors shouldn't be that hard.
My guess is it will be pricey though. If the 1 series bodies are in the 7k range, then expect over 10k - more $$$ than pentax, but less than hasslebad/leica...just guessing
It all depends on how many MP they can get into a FF camera compared to how many MP they could get into a MF camera.
I'm sure there are professional phtographers that will buy a high megapixel Canon MF, especially if they can use some of their existing lenses.
ignoring all other posts, this would at least give justice to all the fuzz about big MP sensors being tested in the wild...So, is the new 1Ds the 1MF?
I hope they make it affordable.
How about it Canon? World's first affordable MF-system? That would get it to world dominating levels in no time.
The only reason to why me and everyone I know haven't bought MF, is because it is too damn expensive.
+1 as well! I dig the creative direction.I think it would help the image if the background was less distracting. I like the pose and what you were going for though.+1
Hey what's the green cube on the top of the camera? And what do you use for the what I assume is a neutral density filter, I've been dyin tryin to figure out the best approach for ND filters! Btw cool photo!
thanks very much for your advices .
so i must go FF , with tse -17 and 24 .... . sorry but one more question : do you think having 16-35 mk2 or24-70 is at all nessecery along my 2 tse lenses , or a waste of money ? and one more thing .... my power shot is veryweak on iso performance ( max 400) so most of the time i need a stable surface as a tripod ( because i dont have one ) specially for interiors . so after all this ... do you recommed 5d2( my iso problem) ?
i am looking forward to your precious replies ....
Does the geared head help align panoramas?