March 02, 2015, 02:45:30 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - HurtinMinorKey

Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 29
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: 5DM3 for video?
« on: March 05, 2012, 02:40:09 PM »
Eye of Mind looks pretty good, but it's only available in low res (WTF Canon?). 

Mario & Nette is a disgrace, and someone should get fired for deciding to use it as a sample movie.

Color of Hope is okay, but like Mario & Nette they relied too much on natural light. I really want to see what the camera can do under Ideal conditions.

EOS Bodies / Re: Nikon D800 vs Canon 5d3 sample images.
« on: March 05, 2012, 02:03:16 PM »
Either way, both companies should be ashamed with the quality of photography skill demonstrated in these samples. Half the people on this site could do better. 

EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Is the 5DM3 better for video?
« on: March 04, 2012, 12:51:34 AM »
Mobius was probably the worst of the demos, and an embarrassment to filmmaking. He could have done much better with the baller c300. So if he is going to comment on a camera he hasn't used, then why should we care?

It has been suggested that this is an artifact of sharpening.  I'm gonna test this once I get home.

Here it is at 400% magnification.

This image ?

I see noise in the second pic (it's taken at 6400ISO, so it's what you'd expect).

Okay, I'm seeing some halos around the stars in the first pic. Is this what you are referring to?  Could this just be a JPEG artifact?

<a href=";current=blackHalo.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

EOS Bodies / Re: Hugely Disappointed In 5D III Price
« on: March 02, 2012, 12:24:35 PM »
The price relative to the d800 makes sense.  Canon won a lot of market share with the 5d mkII, so they figure they can price a camera which is the same overall quality(with different strengths) above the competition because of switching costs.  Canon must feel that 700 is less than the switching cost, and they are probably right. 

EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: 5DM3 for video?
« on: March 02, 2012, 12:16:20 PM »
^Thank you for correcting my math.

The comparison to Blu-ray is a bit deceiving though. Because Blu-ray is a finalized product in compressed form. You need more information to do post production work. But either way, 90Mbs looks good. I just hope they don't nerf it when they realize that it outclasses the C300 in this one aspect.

EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: 5DM3 for video?
« on: March 02, 2012, 12:29:37 AM »
it does look like it beats the c300 in bitrate though. The way I interepret the specs is 10.1 MBs (80Mbs), so that looks like 30fps @4:2:2. Anyone else agree?

EOS Bodies / Re: Introducing the Canon 5D Mark III
« on: March 02, 2012, 12:19:03 AM »
What's the max bit-rate on the video?

EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III Full Spec List?
« on: March 01, 2012, 11:55:25 AM »
All I can say is, thank God they moved the on/off switch.

EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III Full Spec List?
« on: March 01, 2012, 11:48:58 AM »
With the new processor we should be able to get a better chroma sample: 4:2:2. It should be able to handle somewhere between 80-100 Mbps, which would be very nice.   

Also, my guess is that they have applied the tweaks that limit the well known image artifact issues of the mkII.

If they can do this, I'll be happy.

My wife is the real Photog, so if I get her the new 5d mkIII, then i get her old mkII. 

EOS Bodies / Re: NO 5dM3 On Friday * CONFIRMED By a canon Rep Today
« on: February 29, 2012, 12:18:14 PM »
I don't think they'd be building that massive stage in Shanghai just to announce B-list product.  We're gonna see 5D something.

EOS Bodies / Re: *UPDATE* The Next 5D on March 2, 2012 [CR3]
« on: February 28, 2012, 07:05:35 PM »
I'm all for supporting meaningless causes.

Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 29