September 21, 2014, 10:08:45 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Fleetie

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 19
181
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III - February 7, 2012 [CR2]
« on: January 28, 2012, 09:01:27 AM »
Edit: I guess for a 3:2 aspect ratio, that makes ROUGHLY 5746 x 3828 pixels.

i guess it's more 5760 * 3840, because it will be 3 times the 1920*1080 size, with the 3:2 aspect ratio.

Well spotted! Good call.

182
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III - February 7, 2012 [CR2]
« on: January 28, 2012, 07:52:54 AM »
I am still surprised by this 22MP figure. I really thought they'd use the 18MP sensor from the 1DX, or a variant of it.

Oh well, at least they're not going MP-insane; I'm in the ISO camp rather than the MP camp.

I'm cool with this. I can't afford one right yet, but I expect to be able to by the time the 5D3 is available to the public. Well, I could afford one right now but don't wanna raid my savings for it! That would be silly.

Yeah, I'll happily take a 5D3 with those specs.


Edit: I guess for a 3:2 aspect ratio, that makes ROUGHLY 5746 x 3828 pixels.

183
Software & Accessories / Re: Canon Pixma Pro-1 Review Sneak Peak
« on: January 27, 2012, 05:37:40 PM »
A few points:


The printer looks lovely. But I've given up having colour (or any) printers because I print so seldom that the jets dry up and get blocked and then cannot be unblocked at all. On these pricey Canon printers, is there the same problem? If not, how do they manage to avoid it?

Yeah, let us know how much money per full-colour A3+ photo print.

I currently pay £1.20 inc. VAT for 18"x12". It's gonna work out way more than that, I would imagine.

Does it print right to the borders of A3+ paper?

A3+ is not even photo aspect ratio (3:2); it's about 1.46:1.0 . So you end up with a border along one edge, right? (I had to look up the paper size on Wikipedia!)


Enjoy your printer!


Edit: Why is this thread in "Software & Accessories" when there is now a section called "Speedlites, Printers, Accessories"?

Edit 2: Figured it out: The "Speedlites, Printers, Accessories" is in the "Rumours" supersection. A printer review has nothing to do with rumours. Got it. But I still think the word "Printers" should appear in the name of one of the "Gear Talk" sections.

184
I've always believed that shooting stills was just a fad that would soon pass
For values of "soon" much greater than the 100+ years the practice has been going on so far... ?

No, you must have been joking when you said that. Sorry for taking it seriously; I don't know what I was thinking!


185
EOS Bodies / Re: Announcement Date? [CR1]
« on: January 24, 2012, 03:26:06 AM »
Yes, I reckon a good bit of discussion took place on exactly how much of the camera should be shown in the leaked shots; how much of the top LCD screen, which buttons should be visible and how clearly, and so on.

I bet real effort went into getting those photos "just so".

186
EOS Bodies / Re: *UPDATE* 5D Mark III Sighting?
« on: January 23, 2012, 07:40:18 PM »
This is thrilling stuff!

Noticed the record-breaking board activity? I copied this just a minute ago from the board's front page:

Most Online Today: 835. Most Online Ever: 835 (2012-01-23, 21:16:53)

Without wishing to be inflammatory, I hope Neuro is right that the 25.2MP figure is a red herring; I'd like to see the 1DX sensor in the 5D3, for optimal low-light performance.

187
Lenses / Re: Is my 70-200 2.8 mk.II back focussing?
« on: January 15, 2012, 08:06:04 PM »
Nice picture. But yes, it really does look like significant back-focus to me. I assume you were wide-open?


I took my 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II out today.

I'm still at that early stage where I'm like "I'm gonna take nearly all my pics wide open, cos I'd didn't pay £2k for a lens to then stop it down!"!

I'll grow out of it... Eventually!  :-)


I suppose: Send body and lens off for calibration and wait; or Buy a 5D2 body with AFMA. Or return lens and lucky-dip again.

EDIT:  Or, where possible, aim slightly in front; in this case, the tip of her nose, I guess. But that's an unsatisfactory solution, in many situations.

188
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/2.8L II [CR2]
« on: January 15, 2012, 06:23:48 PM »
More information has trickled in about the “thorn in my side”, aka the Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L IS II.
It’s still reported that there is no IS in any of the prototypes.

Yet you've imbued it with IS !! :-)

189
EOS Bodies / Re: Replacement? (Equivalent)
« on: January 08, 2012, 11:13:29 AM »
Neuro, Elflord:

Thanks for that.

"the predicted number holds pretty well for sensors of the same approximate technology" <-- That's what I was getting at.

190
EOS Bodies / Re: Replacement? (Equivalent)
« on: January 07, 2012, 11:42:27 PM »
Would the first combination result in more light, thus requiring a lower iso?
Not quite - a FF sensor would need the same ISO for a given scene, assuming the same aperture and shutter speed. But, the same ISO on FF would have a noise level equivalent to 1.3 stops lower ISO on APS-C

Neuro, can you explain the above to a humble mortal like me? The exact figure of "1.3"? My naive thinking suggests to me that noise would partly be a function of technology as well as the limits that physics imposes. For example, a full-frame 5D classic would exhibit significantly more noise than would a 5D2 under identical conditions; yet your post reads as though the numbers are a physical absolute, derived just from the dimensions of the sensor. Where does the "1.3" come from, and is that a physics-related number, or just something to do with the characteristics of the 5D2?

I guess I'm embarrassed because I have a physics background, yet I am unable to satisfy myself that I understand this!

191
EOS Bodies / Re: Shutter Life - non-serious post :-)
« on: January 07, 2012, 04:56:50 AM »
Reminds me of the Veyron's fuel capacity; About 10 to 15 minutes with the pedal to the metal!

Not sure about its tyre life at that rate; anyone know?!

192
EOS Bodies / Re: Do you REALLY need a new camera?
« on: January 05, 2012, 07:46:07 PM »
On the plus side, you can keep the pizza warm on the smokin' tyres when the Veyron has been screaming along at its top speed (most recent version, IIRC) at 267 MPH !

Back to the subject : I'm fine to keep using my 7D for a few months yet, while I build up my rainy-day fund to where I want it to be, and then after a bit longer I'll have about enough for the 5D3, if the same ever appears, which I think by that time it will have.

Until then I'll keep using my 7D as first camera; I feel I should have it as such for at least 2 years, which period will expire on 30th April 2012. So it's all fine, for me. I'll wait a bit. I tend to shoot long anyway, so the crop of the 7D doesn't hurt a bit.

If the 5D3 is high-MP and poor-ISO-noise, I'll save for longer and have to get the oversized (for ME) 1DX. I'll do it if I have to.


Martin

193
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 1D X High ISO shot preview
« on: December 31, 2011, 07:48:59 PM »
Only a few hours ago I compiled a Facebook album of 7D photos I have just taken back in my hometown, 22-40 years after growing up there and last being at the places I just photographed.

But for some of those places, I also still have digital images of FILM PRINTS I took myself in late 1987 (24 years ago) when I was a teenager, of the SAME places from the SAME angles, for the SAME views. The winter of '87-'88 was a year of record-breaking snowfall in our location, hence the photos taken. (I used an Olympus OM30 to take them, and I have no idea what film.)

So I put the old film images next to the corresponding present-day views in my FB album. I think it adds an interesting touch; I was a teenager then; I'm (early) middle-aged now.

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.2157469556845.83291.1849695638&type=1&l=34ea53fc64

194
Lenses / Re: So what kinda gear did Santa bring you this year?
« on: December 25, 2011, 03:49:33 PM »
Satan brought me a 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II as well. In advance.

And then weeks and weeks of overcast, gloomy miserable weather in which NOT to use it.  >:-/

195
United Kingdom & Ireland / Re: Hello...Anyone else from the UK?
« on: December 24, 2011, 09:12:10 PM »
I am from Rochester, Kent.

But I live in south Manchester now. Funnily enough, I'm going back down to Rochester for a few days after xmas, to see my Mum and sister, and I'll be taking the 7D for the first time, and a few lenses, to capture pics of the place where I began, and where I grew up for 18 years before moving north for uni in 1989.

Because I was born in the same house my Mum still lives in, and we never moved, I have many very strong memories of Rochester, and I want to get some pics of the place I still see often in my dreams and memories, even though it's changed a lot since my childhood. Some things are still the same, obviously.

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 19