February 01, 2015, 03:21:14 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - funkboy

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 29
Hi Ed,

Sorry to hear about your troubles.  For my part, I stopped worrying about people randomly hitting the smite button long ago.

There are a few online payment processing facilities that I'd recommend over PayPal (just search for PayPal wall of shame to see why).  The most widely used one is probably Google Checkout.

American Express opened their Serve service last year, though I believe it's still only open to US residents.

Finally, there's a spiffy little credit card reader for tablets & phones called Square.  I haven't read enough into the inner workings of their app to see if they can also process online transactions or not.

Anyway, don't let one negative experience get you down.  The Internet certainly removes a layer of politeness from people vs. vocal communication.

Software & Accessories / Re: Before you upgrade to Lightroom 4...
« on: March 06, 2012, 11:36:17 AM »
This appears to be a 64 bit issue

The Mac version of Lightroom had full 64 bit support in version 3 <grin>

EOS Bodies / Speed & Quality
« on: March 01, 2012, 07:10:25 AM »
I've got a poster on the wall in my office that says:


pick any two...

I got it from my VW mechanic.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 7Dmk2 any rumors??
« on: February 29, 2012, 09:05:56 AM »
The best conjecture I've seen points to Photokina for the 7DII.  I think it will also depend on what Canon thinks Nikon's timing for the D400 is.

EOS Bodies / Re: Here's an Invite for March 2, 2012
« on: February 29, 2012, 09:04:24 AM »
From everything I've seen so far, I'd say 50/50 chance between 5DIII and 650D.

Possibly both; wouldn't be the first time they've announced two EOS cameras at the same event...

EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Act Of Valor shot exclusively on 7D & 5DII
« on: February 27, 2012, 03:38:25 PM »
The link says wide release on president's day.  This was a indie film picked up for a mere 13 million.

Perhaps the lower budget was partially due to the Navy "lending" hardware to the film for promotional purposes.

I'd imagine the rental, insurance, & operation of all the military hardware in the movie (planes, guns, vehicles, etc) to a normal Hollywood production would come pretty close to 13 mil by itsself.

Apparently the acting budget wasn't too high either, judging from the reviews...

EOS Bodies / Re: The new 5D Mark III ?!?! PICS!
« on: February 27, 2012, 09:24:30 AM »
In the 3rd photo, is that a scratch on the viewfinder bulge next to the mode dial, or evidence of image manipulation?

PowerShot / Re: Quick & Dirty Review: Canon PowerShot G1 X
« on: February 26, 2012, 08:17:07 PM »
Nice article.  Your objectivity is appreciated.

If you want to try it with a small (well, small-ish) flash, check out the 270EX II. I recently moved up to it from a 220EX that I used as my travel flash, & the ability to do bounce with such a small flash is really nice.

Lenses / Re: Patent: Canon EF 35 f/2 IS
« on: February 24, 2012, 07:39:54 PM »
At least double! After all it's a faster f/2.0 not a slow f/2.8  :(

The current micromotor 35mm is f/2.0...

Lenses / Re: Patent: Canon EF 35 f/2 IS
« on: February 24, 2012, 07:37:57 PM »
If it's less than 600€ I'd snap one up immediately.  It certainly has fewer & less complex elements than the other two designs.

Also bear in mind that Sony has a stabilized E-mount 50mm f/1.8 going for $400 now...

Lenses / Re: New Lenses Coming [CR3]
« on: February 23, 2012, 04:35:08 PM »
The folks questioning the necessity of pancake lenses on DSLRs have clearly never used the Voigt 20mm Color Skopar or any of the fantastic options available for Pentax bodies.  The Zeiss Tessar has tempted me in the past as well...

Lenses / Re: Canon 135mm f2 mk2?
« on: February 22, 2012, 02:03:00 PM »
Just curious, but does anyone know how the 135 f/2 does with the 1.4x III compared to the 70-200 f/2.8 II?

Well, I had a 70-200 f/4L (non-IS) & sold it because it was redundant next to my 135L + 1.4x II (I'd never carry both the zoom AND the 135/tc, and the zoom usually lost the draw).  The 135/tc package is extremely portable, esp. if you're in an environment where you can carry the TC in your pocket & only use it when you need it (i.e. someplace not very dusty).  Basically the TC induces a very slight loss of contrast that can be easily compensated for in post.  Well worth the investment.  I'd love another reasonably priced fast prime that works with the TC.

EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III Book Shows Up at Amazon France
« on: February 13, 2012, 12:21:14 PM »
Also listed at FNAC with the same release date...

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: DOF FF vs Crop...
« on: February 13, 2012, 10:45:32 AM »
This tutorial should clear up the subject for you.  Don't think of it as "smaller DOF at the same focal length", but more like "subject size given the desired depth of field".

On a crop-frame camera, if you want a very shallow depth of field then the lens that will provide that DoF on a FF camera will require you to be further away from your subject in order for the subject to be framed identically.  And of course as you move further away from your subject (to compensate for the smaller sensor only "seeing" the center of the image rendered by the lens) the depth of field increases as you increase the focus distance...

EOS Bodies / Re: How does Canon respond to the D800?
« on: February 11, 2012, 06:51:13 AM »
That blog is a total mess. It's also funny how he has gone from like 100% raving against Canon to 100% raving against Nikon. Very bizarre.

That's why ol' Fake Chuck is so near & dear to our hearts :-).  Takes a lot of guts to be that crazy in such a public manner.

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 29