September 01, 2014, 11:40:58 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - wickidwombat

Pages: 1 ... 206 207 [208] 209 210 ... 300
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5DMk3 Poll Deleted?
« on: March 27, 2012, 08:48:46 PM »
No it was not the 500th thread about what people thought.

It was a poll about frequency of issues (if any) that people have been complaining about with their 5Dmk3.  I'm interested in what issues I should be aware of when my preorder arrives and if it was just a select few.

Guess I also assumed I'd at least get a message as to why the post was deleted.
I made a poll for this already maybe thats why? not sure though

To be honest, the IQ is negligible over my 5D2.  Although all I ever really wanted out of my 5D2 was better AF, Slightly faster frame rate, and a dual card slot.  So I cant complain.  More testing still needs to be done. And a good side by side with the D800.  Ill give a more complete review when I put it through the paces at my wedding.  Ive found wedding photography to be a good testing ground :)

Isn't "testing" at a wedding a bit risky?

brave man! I'm waiting unitl i've fully tested everything before i shoot any critical work with it.

I discovered this last night, I'm very disappointed, I havent tried my kenko extension tubes yet, i'll try them later and see. I hope canon fix this with a firmware update

EOS Bodies / Re: Another 5D III Review.
« on: March 27, 2012, 08:31:17 PM »
obviously no one has told that guy you cant take shots of birds with a full frame camera :P

(that was a shameless joke at the expense of the APS-C people, sorry but I couldnt resist)

but more seriously those shots look really good

Site Information / Re: Bring Back Karma – NOW!
« on: March 27, 2012, 08:25:12 PM »
i think trolls wre responsible for most smiting, maybe the cutoff for being able to give karma should need like a minimum of 100 post count, something high, as trolls would likely get bored or banned before they get that many posts

I liked karma

EOS Bodies / Re: 5D2 vs 5D3 ISO100 around 50 test raws
« on: March 27, 2012, 08:11:16 PM »
What no ones interested in this, come on its only a measly 1GB or so of raw files :P

Sports / Re: Cars cars cars (and some bikes)
« on: March 27, 2012, 08:02:54 PM »
shot my first drifting competition this weekend.  Never done panning shots before, but I think i hit it right on the money. 

I also learned that I should bring an extra 16gb card next time I shoot.  I had to change to small raw have way through shooting.
yeah that is a nice shot

Lenses / Re: Do you trust these online HK/china online stores?
« on: March 27, 2012, 07:58:25 PM »
i have bought lots off ebay, I always use paypal
I think camera paradise are dodgy though they advertise 1 price which looks too good to be true then try to trape you on shipping.
stick with digital rev, dzone2, kong kong  buy and sell, ozdigital online
they are the 4 i use mainly

In humans the nose grows throughout your life so large noses are associated with older people.

keeps growing! damn i am doomed... I wonder if they make eye piece extensions for people that are geometrically nasally challenged

Ha Ha Ha!!! Not really. That is why they have live view and some cameras have the flip out lcd screen!

turning your dSLR into an overpriced and glorified point and shoot

I get your drift. But, (and it is a BIG but) {notice that that word ended with a single 't' and not two...} if a vital part of your anatomy interfered with the ability to shoot with an SLR in the way you would prefer to, would you not want to shoot at all? I would, even if I had to point...

Now that was all banter... However, my eyes are not as good as they used to be. So a larger screen and reading glasses help me. An angled LED screen helps frame a picture when there is a wall of photographers in front of me having "Press" passes. I don't have any such privileges. So the flip-out screen helps. Now if I were 8 foot something I probably would not care; but I am not, so that is where my preference comes from.
Now I could have sworn Canon did have some sort of extension. I think it may have also magnified the image a tad. I'll have try & remember where I saw it. I think it was OEM and an on their website.....
Really while I was joking i would totally buy that for my 5Dmk2, 1D bodys have it further out by default so they are more comfortable

Lenses / Re: Do all of canons 50 mm lens suck?
« on: March 27, 2012, 07:47:54 PM »
I would happily pay $1000 for a new 50mm f1.4L similar size to the exisiting and L build same as the 100 f2.8L macro with similar sharpness etc circular apperture baldes etc engineering plastics to keep is small and light
which is one of the benefits of the fiddy.

EOS Bodies / Re: Delivered 5Dmk3 Units Awesome vs Has problems
« on: March 27, 2012, 07:38:54 PM »
bump. I should have made this so people could change their vote if they decide theirs is fubar after the intial ecstacy of recieving the camera

EOS Bodies / Re: 5D III focus accuracy with fast primes wide open
« on: March 27, 2012, 07:34:56 PM »
Thanks guys, yeah i'm not getting anything remotely that sharp :'(

I'm a little confused that you can make that assessment from a 640x427 jpeg.. If you really can tell from an image that small, you're doing something wrong or your camera or lens is incredibly broken.

I'm also a little confused by the wording of this thread's subject. Aren't all lenses "wide open" during autofocus? The aperture is only adjusted when the shutter is activated (or the depth-of-field preview is activated).
true I was just feeling sorry for myself yesterday so i spend most of last night doing detailed testing i posted all the raws this morning

with it all being so new i wish people would only post images or raws straight out of camera.
posting post processed images is fine for showcasing but none of this is about that its about what the camera can do at a base level. I think everyone know that a little PP can dramatically change an image from its raw state to present it in a completely different light.
leave the processed images for the image gallery at the moment htis is all about the gear and what it can and cant do.
I am concerned this new AF system may be a dud  :'(

EOS Bodies / 5D2 vs 5D3 ISO100 around 50 test raws
« on: March 27, 2012, 07:03:59 PM »
So I spent about 8 hours doing this last night
3 tests, all ISO 100

test 1 - the AF micro adjust method using the canon utility
test 2 - shooting a test chart off a tripod
test 3 - handholding a shot to confirm

all tests using center point only
I also turned off the in camera lens correction stuff
anyway all the exif data is there

test 1 and 2 lit by 4 5500K constant lights & shoot through umbrellas
test 3 ambient tungsten light at night

lenses tested
16-35 f2.8 II
50mm 1.4
Sigma 85mm 1.4
100 f2.8L IS Macro
70-200 f2.8L IS II
300 f4L (i had to bump iso on test 3 up to 800 for these being hand held)

I didnt test the 24-105 because my wife was out and had the lens but i will do it and add it in

during this i discovered to my horror that the kenko DGX teleplus 1.4 teleconverter does not work on the 5Dmk3
nice of canon to kill that for me :(  :'(

Overall I feel the images are sharper however I think the 5Dmk2 still beats the 5Dmk3
I have not done any detailed manual focusing tests yet and havent done any more AI servo tests using the 70-200 yet either... maybe tonight.

Anyway happy downloading and comparing.

EOS Bodies / Re: 5D III focus accuracy with fast primes wide open
« on: March 27, 2012, 06:47:35 PM »
So I have a the new 5dmk3 and a 50mm 1.2L.  I have been trying to get the micro adjustment on the lens just right, but but I figured out why it had been a bit confusing up to this point.  If I use the center point (or any AF point within the metering ring) I get spot on tack sharp AF on like 90% of the shots with 0 MFA.  BUT, if I use one of the outer AF spots I get pretty bad back focusing (like +15).  I thought maybe it was the body I had, so I just went back to the camera store and exchanged it for another body hoping that I would at least be able to figure out if that was the variable.  Turns out this body is exactly the same.  This makes me think it is either difficult for the AF to get a good lock due to the aberrations of the glass the closer you get to the edge, or something wrong with the lens itself (it is brand new and date code is uz0909).  I'm also just wondering if this is the price you pay with AF on really fast glass.  That is where you come in.  If you have fast glass (1.2) try checking the AF accuracy on center point and a more lateral point and lets see if we can come to a consensus.  I'm especially interested in 50mm 1.2 as thats what I'm working with.  I tested my 70-200 2.8 and it's pretty spot on with no MFA, on both center and lateral AF points.  I'll post a few test shots of my 50 when I get home later.
this could explain my wildly varied results too although i was deliberately stopping down to f2 or f2.8 to give it a bit of a chance also images are sharper there.

Pages: 1 ... 206 207 [208] 209 210 ... 300