September 16, 2014, 11:58:50 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wickidwombat

Pages: 1 ... 234 235 [236] 237 238 ... 301
3526
EOS Bodies / Re: Neck Strap Loops Design
« on: March 01, 2012, 06:12:36 PM »
is that just a zip tie? :o

3527
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III Full Spec List?
« on: March 01, 2012, 06:10:06 PM »
Does this mean that the posters on this site that have achieved %d Mark II status will automatically be upgarded to Mk. III status tomorrow?  8)
no you need 40% more posts due to the cost increase... :P

3528
I was never going to buy a 1Dx
if i wanted the intergrated bulky grip i'd get a 1D4 (might still)
but a couple of 5Dmk3s will surely find a home :D

3529
EOS Bodies / Re: More Images From Shanghai
« on: March 01, 2012, 07:55:54 AM »
stupid aussie prices looks like a holiday to hong kong will be in order

3530
EOS Bodies / Re: CR99999999!!!!!!!!!5D3 tomorrow!!!!!
« on: March 01, 2012, 06:02:29 AM »
haha ditto that!

3531
EOS Bodies / Re: CR99999999!!!!!!!!!5D3 tomorrow!!!!!
« on: March 01, 2012, 05:44:40 AM »
Here is the picture to the previously posted link.

Yup. I can 100% confirm that this is a camera.

LOL. Nicely played sir. I thought it was a microwave.
no you need the battery grip to get that feature mate :P

3532
EOS Bodies / Re: The (un)official I'm switching to Nikon thread
« on: March 01, 2012, 05:43:04 AM »
Beginning tomorrow night all those who are disappointed because Canon did not create a 5DIII to their personal specifications and offer it at $1,500 can lodge their complaints here, on one handy thread, instead of having to start their own personal complaint thread.
This is just insulting. I choose a camera and lens based upon what best serves my photographic needs and my budget constraints. When the last generation of cameras came out, it was a close call, but I went with Canon.

I have very specific needs met perfectly by the 1Dx + 200-400/f4 1.4. Unfortunately, that combination looks like it's going to cost me... I can't believe I'm saying this, $18,000 after getting a couple of the accessories. Eighteen large!

My needs are also perfectly met by a refurbished 200-400/f4 + D4 +1.4 TC. This combination is $5000 less. That's a lot of money. I can buy a lot of things with $5000, like 80% of a backup D4, or a D800 and a 70-200/2.8 VR II lens. See where I'm going with this?

Add to this that I have an extremely important event to cover in April and another in May. Do I know that the Canon 200-400/f4 will be in my hands by then? Or even the 1DX? No. But I already have the Nikon lens and the D4 is still on track for mid March delivery.

I am going to keep all of my Canon gear just in case the Nikon system doesn't work out. I will lose $0 on the refurbished lens and maybe $1000 tops on the D4. If it doesn't work out, it was cheaper than renting the combination for the summer.

But please don't snottily tell me that I'm being frivolous or crybaby because this has been a very hard decision. People have needs and certain cameras and lenses fulfill those needs better than others. It's as simple as that.

sure you dont want to sell me your 1D4? :D

3533
EOS Bodies / Re: So, what about the T4i?
« on: March 01, 2012, 05:40:30 AM »
I'm waiting for 650D too.

One question about XXXD line. If it is a line for photographers-beginners (or amateurs with little money), then why they should require so many megapixles?
Aren't megapixels for studio (or landscape) photographers, who can shoot REALLY well and make money on this?
What is the profit of 18 mp if a person can't shoot well?

Further more, 18mp require really good AF (if one shoots portraits), very good lenses (calibrated in service-centre), micro AF adjustment (which is missing in XXXd) and good patience when pictures are somewhat out of focus.

Am I the only one who sees that xxxd line is not "well balanced" in terms of feautures and target audience?

Most of the time I shoot in clubs, I need clean high iso, accurate AF, excellent background blur => "sports camera" is for me, however, there is not a single canon camera that is targeted for such audience under 1Dx :(((
5Dmk2 at 3200 iso with a 50mm f1.4 center focus point you will be fine. upcoming price drops for new or cheaper second hand might be more in line with what you need

3534
EOS Bodies / Re: CR99999999!!!!!!!!!5D3 tomorrow!!!!!
« on: March 01, 2012, 05:36:22 AM »
What if the hidden part of the poster actually says "Coming in 2013"..?  ;) ;)
then i keep shooting with 5D2s till the 3s come out :D

3535
EOS Bodies / Re: So, what about the T4i?
« on: March 01, 2012, 04:02:28 AM »
Ah see you are using crazy things like physics! I was only talking from a pure marketing BS perspective that they must beat sony to get the win at best buy.

Anyone tested out what the 18-55 kit lens can resolve?

3536
EOS Bodies / Re: Neck Strap Loops Design
« on: March 01, 2012, 03:54:17 AM »
here is the modified L bracket, the hacked marks are where i used a dremel to make it fit
this can lock into a capture on my belt to stop the body swinging, the rapid strap remains hooked up all the time
to go to a tripod simply unclip the carabina from the rapid

3537
EOS Bodies / Re: Neck Strap Loops Design
« on: March 01, 2012, 03:40:24 AM »
A quick question for Black Rapid users...do you have to remove the BR when you need to use a monopod or tripod?
If so, is it very quick & simple?

My monopod & tripods use plate attachment systems.
Specifically: http://www.manfrotto.com/quick-release-plate-adapter and http://www.manfrotto.com/hexagonal-plate-adapter
and for the monopod http://www.manfrotto.com/quick-change-rectangular-plate-adapter

Cheers, Paul Wright
no its a pain in the ass
which is why i have my modified rr L bracket hang on i'll go get  a pic brb

3538
EOS Bodies / Re: Thunderbolt in the new 5DMK3
« on: March 01, 2012, 03:38:54 AM »
av port may be thunderbolt perhaps  :-\

3539
but thats my point the sensor tech needs to improve to address the issues that cause the APS-C sensor to be inferior to the full frame and APS-H sensors. just taking the same tech and making it bigger would be horrible.

I was more descriptive here
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php/topic,3739.0.html

3540
EOS Bodies / Re: If this is the best the D800 can do...
« on: March 01, 2012, 12:50:22 AM »
I hope my post didn't come across as critical of Nikon or the D800 - that's not what I meant. What I want from a camera upgrade is a stop or two better ISO than my 5D2, and from what I've seen the D800 is not it. If the Mk III doesn't improve on the Mk II's high-ISO noise then I won't be buying it either, but frankly, since it seems they're keeping the resolution about the same, I can only imagine they'll improve the quality of the sensor and photosites in this regard.
I hope so i would love the 12800 to be the new 3200 :D

Pages: 1 ... 234 235 [236] 237 238 ... 301