October 01, 2014, 08:53:41 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wickidwombat

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 301
46
Lenses / Re: A New Pancake Lens? [CR1]
« on: August 26, 2014, 05:25:50 AM »
I guess I'm the only one hoping for an EF-M pancake. I certainly don't expect it, I just like the idea of having another pocketable lens for my little friend.

id be super keen for a EF-M 35 f2 pancake

47
Software & Accessories / Re: CR2 files corrupted
« on: August 26, 2014, 04:46:27 AM »
try the sandisk software,
if you don't have a code for the sandisk software pm me and i'll give you a valid one i haven't used

i've also used the transcend recover x software successfully after reformating a card after a wedding ceremony...
now THAT was a sphinter twitching moment....

48
Software & Accessories / Re: iPad app Model Release
« on: August 25, 2014, 08:33:27 PM »
i've got VM release

signing is done on the screen, its customisable too

49
EOS Bodies / Re: Are These The EOS 7D Mark II Specifications?
« on: August 25, 2014, 08:02:59 PM »
Well...to each is own, I guess. Me, I'm going to get vocal about Canon's crappy low ISO noise, and do everything I can to back up my claims with concrete, visual evidence...because, it's really freakin NASTY noise. STILL nasty...after all these years. And I think that needs to change (especially because Canon is still my preferred brand...I'd rather have a 5D IV with 50mp and 14 stops of DR than a D800.)

I see nothing wrong with jrista complaining about "Canon's crappy low ISO noise."

Anyone is welcome to complain about anything they want. But...

...doing it over and over and over and over again to the same audience becomes tedious.

...attempting to "prove" your point again and again to those who happen to disagree with your opinion becomes annoying.

...insisting that you are right and then attacking anyone who doesn't share your viewpoint is obnoxious.

...failing to recognize that what you perceive to be a major concern isn't necessarily even a minor concern of others is rude.

...hijacking every discussion to push your agenda with long diatribes that repeat the same basic points time after time is obsessive.

...demeaning others when they raise concerns about features that you don't happen to care about (as in touch screens) is narrow minded.

...making wild claims that unless your particular obsession is addressed by a major multi-national corporation they will be doomed is delusional.

And, most important of all...thinking that these discussions on an internet forum are anything more than trivial ineffective entertainment is just silliness.
well said mr unfocused

50
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon mirrorless: Status?
« on: August 25, 2014, 07:39:12 PM »
^^ Wow - nice and compact! I have the 11-22 for the M but I am sure the 8mm fisheye can capture the back of your head with the FOV ;)

yeah its great here is a snapshot in hong kong airport


51
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon mirrorless: Status?
« on: August 25, 2014, 07:13:55 PM »
this is the EF-S and EF-M samyang / rokinon 8mm comparison
without even adding in the adapter there is a massive size difference already

Would you be so kind as to upload a wee pic of the EOS M with the EF-M version of the 8mm fisheye attached to it please?

Just want to see it for reference.

sure i'll do it now
here it is with the 18-55 for comparison

52
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon mirrorless: Status?
« on: August 25, 2014, 07:05:44 PM »
this is the EF-S and EF-M samyang / rokinon 8mm comparison
without even adding in the adapter there is a massive size difference already

Would you be so kind as to upload a wee pic of the EOS M with the EF-M version of the 8mm fisheye attached to it please?

Just want to see it for reference.

sure i'll do it now

53
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon mirrorless: Status?
« on: August 25, 2014, 01:10:42 AM »
this is the EF-S and EF-M samyang / rokinon 8mm comparison
without even adding in the adapter there is a massive size difference already

54
EOS Bodies / Re: Are These The EOS 7D Mark II Specifications?
« on: August 25, 2014, 12:05:10 AM »
looks pretty decent to me
if there a some deals or sale down the road after the bleeding edge stampede dies off i might pick one up and leave it stuck on the tamron 150-600

55
Lenses / Re: advice for new lens´╝čplease
« on: August 24, 2014, 11:53:00 PM »
I have 35L 50L,135L,200L trying to get 1-2 new lens to travel

1.wish list/ (16-35f2.8 or f4) (24-70 f2.8II) (70-200mm f2.8 or 70-200mm f4)

2.would you sell 35L or 200L when u get 16-35 or 70-200?

3.which 3 lens would u take to travel? and street photography

advice anyone? thanks ^^
i travel alot and take 16-35, 50mm and either 70-200 or the 135 depending on what i'm doing

56
Canon General / Re: Carry on restrictions on South African Airways
« on: August 24, 2014, 04:56:54 AM »
You might want to do that anyway even if baggage is not a problem, since SAA cabin crew have got to be among the worst out there. They are among the most unfriendly, sour and unhelpful flight attendants I have ever encountered. They all seem to hate their jobs, or more precisely, they like having the job and the travel it brings, but hate the actual doing it part. It could be that most of them are black, whereas most travelers on SAA flights are white, and there is some carry over resentment from the apartheid era where they see catering to the needs of a bunch of white folk as demeaning. In any event the general attitude of their flight attendants is very sullen.

Pretty well my own experience, it's sad, but I agree 100% with both the comment & sentiments expressed.

its a tough call which is worse SAA or British Airways both airlines i would quite happily never ever have to fly with again
unfortunately going to africa you have limited options
consider singapore air as a better option they are an awesome airline i'd give them the #1 slot any day and I fly ALOT

57
Portrait / Re: Little girl looking at flowers
« on: August 24, 2014, 04:20:40 AM »
I expected it to be warmer... It has a blue tone... my phone maybe?

I agree its a nice shot but I think you should warm it up a bit

58
Lenses / Re: A New Pancake Lens? [CR1]
« on: August 23, 2014, 11:12:50 PM »
its a shame its 24mm a 20mm or 21mm would have been better... and partnered the 40mm better

but that said 24mm will give 38mm on apsc so its kind of like a aps-c version of the 40 on full frame

59
yawn.

anyway. cheap is wide angle in compact form, m + 18-55.

its obviously a matter some discussion if its worth adapting....

haha looks like i read your 18-55 as 10-18 i must be getting dyslexic :P

depend how wide the OP wants to go really but for what $250 on ebay you can get a brand new M with the lens and the ex90 flash pretty awesome deal really

60
EOS M +18-55. Lens is also IS.

Seriously.

Cheaper than another WA and gives you a b cam for other shots.

 true but then you have to buy the adapter too may as well just get the 11-22 and have a smaller package

Decent clones of the adaptor are how much? $30?

still the 10-18 + adapter is MUCH bigger than the native 11-22
the 10-18 is $300 + your $30 adapter
the 11-22 is around or under $400 for the few extra bucks the 11-22 is a no brainer over the 10-18

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 301