January 27, 2015, 08:49:12 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - DanoPhoto

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Lenses / Re: My New "L"
« on: January 16, 2015, 11:11:59 AM »
...and the "L" glass addiction... ;D

Lenses / Re: EF 100-400mm ii vs. EF 200-400 with 1.4 TC
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:03:05 PM »
money not an issue = 200-400
reality = 100-400 (I went with this one)

Macro / Re: Menage a trois
« on: December 30, 2014, 11:38:19 AM »
spectacular image !

For those that are interested...received this e-mail form RRS...

"Thank you for contacting us about this new lens. We are in the process of designing a replacement foot for the lens and should have a preorder up on the website in the coming weeks. Please feel free to check back for updates."

Lenses / Re: TDP Results for 7D MK II and 100-400mmL MK II
« on: December 25, 2014, 10:39:08 PM »
I wish he had included the 1D MK IV in those

+1, would be interesting to see 7D2 versus 1D4.

Canon EF Zoom Lenses / Re: Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L Mark II
« on: December 23, 2014, 04:28:30 PM »
WOW!  Great image!

Lenses / Re: How satisfied are you with the 100-400 II?
« on: December 23, 2014, 12:06:10 PM »
@PhotosByChuck - welcome to CR.  Great info, thanks for sharing.  I agree with the comments about the tripod ring...odd design, but will adapt to it.

Just saw in a separate thread that RSS is supposed to be coming out with a lens specific replacement foot in January.  I do not know how to cross reference that post, sorry.

That is why they (RRS) have such a loyal following.  They do more than just listen to their customers, they take quick action.

Reviews / Re: Photozone review of 100-400 L II
« on: December 19, 2014, 03:01:26 PM »
Thanks for sharing, Alan.  Objectively and subjectively better than I expected.  ;D

Lenses / Re: How satisfied are you with the 100-400 II?
« on: December 18, 2014, 11:22:10 PM »
Voted 1 - Initial satisfaction is same level as when I first used my 70-200 mark 2.  Both lenses exceeded my personal expectations.  Well worth the wait and pre-order "premium price" for me.  YMMV

apologies for the IQ...using my cell phone.

Anyway I like the idea of putting the plates with the nubs in the front, not the back.  I wonder if the nubs fit up under the front overhang?

Definitely a serviceable solution, however, in a "reversed" position, a longer plate would not fit.  This is a 9cm plate and there is ~1cm between plate and vertical grip of body.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10