1
Lenses / 300/2.8 L (IS MK1) or 400/2.8 L (non-IS)
« on: April 16, 2012, 01:43:15 PM »
I have squirreled away enough of my "allowance" over the past several months that I have approx $3000 to invest in a second hand "big white".
The question I have for the group is, based on my budget, which of these two lens gives me the most "bang for the buck"?
I will likely have the lens on a monopod (kids sports) or tripod (birds and such), so would the only benefit for IS be for framing the shots?
Thoughts? Advice?
The question I have for the group is, based on my budget, which of these two lens gives me the most "bang for the buck"?
I will likely have the lens on a monopod (kids sports) or tripod (birds and such), so would the only benefit for IS be for framing the shots?
Thoughts? Advice?