October 25, 2014, 12:33:18 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Canon Rumors

Pages: 1 ... 107 108 [109] 110 111 ... 174
1621
Lenses / Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II Delayed? [CR2]
« on: April 02, 2012, 12:38:18 PM »
Oh no :(
I’ve heard from multiple places that the upcoming Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II will not reach market by April 17, 2012 as originally stated by Canon. There is no official new date, but we’ve been told and seen elsewhere that it could be delayed until July 2012.

The 5D Mark III has been a relatively successful launch, I am disappointed to see that has turned out to be an exception instead of a new rule.

None of this has been confirmed by Canon yet.

Speaking of 1D X
I posted earlier about the 1D X being allocated to CPS members first in some countries. That does NOT include the USA.. I know it’s true in this one (Canada) as I had to provide a CPS number for preorder.

Source: [DC]

cr


1622
Site Information / Re: Canon Rumors Site Information
« on: April 01, 2012, 10:13:35 PM »
Will you be upgrading to vBulletin 4.x forum or 4.x publishing suite?

4.x Forum

1623
Site Information / Re: Canon Rumors Site Information
« on: April 01, 2012, 10:01:48 PM »
Hey

There will be an install done that will probably be available to moderators, working to make sure the feature sets work and we know how to use it.

The plan should be sorted out by midweek.

1624
Site Information / Re: Canon Rumors Site Information
« on: April 01, 2012, 07:51:37 PM »
We'll be moving to vBulletin soon, we'll probably do a 14 day countdown, as you're going to have to reset your password. It'll be super easy though.

vBulletin will run faster and have post ratings. As well as other features that will be make the board a bit more enjoyable.

I appreciate the patience, critiques and kudos...

More soon



Craig

1625
Site Information / Re: Canon Rumors Site Information
« on: April 01, 2012, 02:04:04 PM »
The solution will be sooner than later... I promise.



Craig

1626
Site Information / Re: Canon Rumors Site Information
« on: April 01, 2012, 01:22:15 PM »
And how does "reputation" implementation correct any of the problems of the "Karma" implementation? The plain answer is that it doesn't. The issue, simply stated, is that, if the goal is to "fix" the poster's behavior, neither implementation provides enough information to give useful feedback. Instead it allows, even invites, sociopaths to anonymously attack posters without actually telling the posters what they are being attacked for. The ONLY implementation that makes sense is on a per-posting basis. It would also be really nice if the attackers couldn't remain anonymous. There is too much anonymity in sites like this and it is insanely stupid to add more.

As I said, that is ideal. We're working towards that but it can't happen overnight.

However, things have gotten worse, not better; since the Karma system was removed. Moderation reports are up, email complaints are way up and threads about "this forum is getting bad" are up.

No action is not the right choice, the karma/reputation system is not ideal but it's something while we work on the ideal solution.

1627
Site Information / Re: Canon Rumors Site Information
« on: April 01, 2012, 01:07:05 PM »
The ratings for forum posts has been a difficult one to figure out, so we're trying out some new things. For now, only a total karma score will show, so you won't see the likes and dislikes broken down. We'll see if that helps keep things honest.

I'm rather disappointed by the re-introduction of the karma system - it still gives a global evaluation and not a per-post one, and people who have a non-compliant opinion are still bound to end up down on the scale. This is because the main shortcomings aren't fixed:

* People will still click "dislike" if they do not agree with a post, i.e. dislike the argument
* You still don't know why you've got bad karma, making it impossible to adjust (or even to think about it)

It seemed more mature without karma in the short meantime because I don't need a rating to ignore troll comments and it doesn't replace a moderation of a forum.

We may be moving to new forum software, and will have the ability to do "post ratings" right off the bat. Currently there is nothing available for our forum solution. That IS an ideal solution and one we hope to have sorted one way or another.

Thanks
Craig

1628
Site Information / Canon Rumors Site Information
« on: April 01, 2012, 09:27:09 AM »
Hey, there are a few changes taking place at canonrumors.com that I thought I'd tell you about.


1) New server/host

Canon Rumors was moved to a new host last night and I don't think anyone really noticed. What you will notice is an increase in site speed, all measurements taken show a dramatic improvement. We're on better hardware and are running a better optimized setup. This will continue to be tweaked over the next couple of days.

2) Return of Karma

The ratings for forum posts has been a difficult one to figure out, so we're trying out some new things. For now, only a total karma score will show, so you won't see the likes and dislikes broken down. We'll see if that helps keep things honest.

It's now called "Reputation" until I figure out a better name.

It's going to get abused by some people, there's not much we can do about that. We just ask that you don't. :)

3) New site design

It's coming, looking to clean things up and make them a bit more uniformed between the site and the forum. This isn't in the immediate future, but it will be in the next 60 to 90 days.


Thanks
Craig

Canon Rumors

1629
Macro / Re: 9:1 macro
« on: March 31, 2012, 08:11:01 AM »
Very cool

1631
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Canon EOS-1D X Delayed Again? [CR2]
« on: March 30, 2012, 12:31:35 PM »
From around the watercooler
I have heard from a couple of places that the Canon EOS-1D X may be delayed, yet again. The latest we’re hearing is that arrival of the camera body won’t be until June, 2012.

We’ve also heard allocation to stores is based on preorders from CPS members. In other words, CPS members will get to the front of the line for 1D X preorders. This may not be true in all countries, but it is in a couple I have confirmed.

This isn’t confirmed by Canon yet.

cr


1632
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV Firmware 1.1.1
« on: March 30, 2012, 10:09:10 AM »
Most won’t need this one.
Canon has released a firmware update for the EOS-1D Mark IV.

Affected Product

  • EOS 1D Mark IV

Firmware Firmware Version 1.1.1 incorporates the following change.

  1. Optimizes the camera’s exposure accuracy when using EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM and EF 28mm f/2.8 IS USM lenses, which are scheduled for release in June 2012. If these lenses are used with an EOS-1D Mark IV camera that has not been updated with the new firmware, the image may be overexposed depending on the subject and shooting scene.

The new Firmware Version 1.1.1 can be downloaded by clicking here.

cr

 


1633
Lenses / Patent: A new 16-35 f/2.8 or Faster Concept?
« on: March 30, 2012, 12:16:43 AM »
Improved Canon ultrawide for full frame?
The world is waiting for Canon to release a top end performing ultra wide lens for full frame cameras. While I think the 17-40 f/4L is a bargain of a workhorse and the 16-35 f/2.8L II is a very solid performer, I think the line is still lacking that standout ultra wide zoom lens. I have heard numerous photographers say they’d pay “anything” for a top notch lens in that segment.

Below are 3 patented optical formulas for new ultrawide angle lenses for Canon.

A 16-35 f/2.8, a 17-35 f/2.8-4 and a 16-35 f/2-2.8. There seems to be a decent amount of f/2 patents appearing on zoom lenses from Canon, it could be time for such a lens to make it to market.

Patent Publication No. 2012-63568

  • 2012.3.29 Release Date
  • 2010.9.16 filing date

Example 2

  • Zoom ratio 2.06
  • 24.00 – - 33.95mm f = 16.48 focal length
  • Fno 2.90 – 2.90 – 2.91
  • 42.03 – - 32.51deg 52.70 angle of view.
  • Image height 21.64mm
  • 170.87 – - 172.62mm 178.10 full-length lens
  • BF 40.00 – 48.45 – 61.71mm
  • Lens Construction 12 group 17 sheets
  • Three three aspherical surface
  • 2 UD lens sheet

Example 4

  • Zoom ratio 1.94
  • 24.01 – - 33.98mm f = 17.51 ​​focal length
  • Fno 2.91 – 3.21 – 3.86
  • Image height 21.64mm
  • 174.18 – - 175.92mm 178.81 full-length lens
  • BF 41.60 – 48.49 – 60.70mm
  • Lens Construction 12 group 17 sheets
  • Three three aspherical surface
  • 2 UD lens sheet

Example 6

  1. Zoom ratio 2.06
  2. 24.02 – - 33.99mm f = 16.49 focal length
  3. Fno 2.15 – 2.46 – 2.94
  4. 42.02 – - 32.48deg 52.69 angle of view.
  5. Image height 21.64mm
  6. 171.08 – - 172.88mm 176.23 full-length lens
  7. BF 39.26 – 46.99 58.75mm
  8. 18 sheets 13 group lens configuration
  9. Three three aspherical surface
  10. 2 UD lens sheet

Canon’s patent

  • 4-group zoom lens of a positive negative positive and negative
  • Inner Focus
  • Optimized so as to reduce the field curvature of the wide-angle side

Source: [EG]

c


1634
EOS Bodies - For Stills / A Nikonian Reviews the Canon 5D Mark III
« on: March 29, 2012, 06:04:26 PM »
A Nikonian loves the 5D Mark III
Nikon wedding photographer Ryan Brenizer took the 5D Mark III to a wedding to discover it’s a pretty good camera. It’s a good review, as he does point out a few weaknesses.

Ryan’s conclusion

Right now, Canon is primarily competing with the Nikon D800. At $500 cheaper and with a high-resolution, high dynamic range sensor, the D800 will be a tempting option for most users. For someone like me who takes more than a quarter million photos a year, the idea of a sensor that only shoots 36MP is a non-starter.

More importantly, Canon has built a near-perfect wedding camera. Great at high ISOs, accurate and customizable autofocus, speedy and quiet operation and with versatile RAW resolution, this camera is finally a worthy companion to Canon’s huge array of lenses. On either the Nikon or Canon side, you can’t use the camera as an excuse anymore.

Read the entire review and check out his great photography here.

Thank Sara

cr

Buy the 5D Mark III at B&HAdorama and Amazon


1635
The 5D Mark III get support
Adobe has released Lightroom 4.1 release candidate and it now supports the Canon EOS 5D Mark III.

Other bug fixes were also addressed. Expect to see a final version of Lightroom 4.1 next week.

New Camera Support

  • Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Fixed Issues

The following issues have been fixed in the Lightroom 4.1 release candidate:

  • Lightroom 4 did not properly open external applications when using the “Edit In” functionality.
  • Point Curve adjustments made in Lightroom 3 have been restored.
  • Addressed performance issues in Lightroom 4, particularly when loading GPS track logs, using a secondary monitor, and the controls within the Develop module.
  • Ability to update DNG previews and metadata for more than 100 photos has been restored.
  • This update allows for improved viewing of subfolders and stacks in folders with a large number of photos.
  • It was possible that a layout of a saved book could be lost after quitting Lightroom 4.

Download Here

cr


Pages: 1 ... 107 108 [109] 110 111 ... 174