January 30, 2015, 03:35:34 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - bgran8

Pages: [1] 2 3
EOS Bodies / Re: A Sony & Canon Sensor Partnership Mentioned Again [CR1]
« on: January 28, 2015, 11:27:38 PM »
Very well done. By the way, your caption under your name is by far the best I've seen.

Hey guys,

I just came across this article on fstoppers: https://fstoppers.com/landscapes/us-forest-service-about-charge-photographers-take-photos-38489

What do you think? Will it affect the landscape photographer that sells photos (in large or small quantities) or will it not go through?

Reviews / Re: Canon 16-35 F4 Review vs. 17-40 Shootout
« on: September 26, 2014, 03:53:08 AM »
I am typically in the 17-24 range, but do go to 40 occasionally.

Reviews / Re: Canon 16-35 F4 Review vs. 17-40 Shootout
« on: September 24, 2014, 07:12:51 PM »
How is the 16-35 f4 at f11 compared to the 17-40? That seems to be the sharpest aperture on the 17-40 and where I typically set the lens for my landscapes. I'm just wondering if there is much to gain by upgrading. Thanks.

EOS Bodies / Re: Do Sensors Make the Camera?
« on: August 27, 2014, 06:22:30 PM »
Do sensors make the camera?

-It's the most important part for me as a landscape photographer.

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deal: Canon Pixma Pro-100 $34 at Adorama
« on: June 27, 2014, 02:46:49 PM »
Am I missing something here? The Adorama website says $89 after rebate and B&H is $98 after the rebate.

Landscape / Re: How Would You Edit This Bracketed Landscape?
« on: March 24, 2014, 11:11:26 PM »
I will add my version soon. My MacBook Pro is back at the Apple store getting the logic board replaced for the 3rd time. When I get it back, I'll post mine.

Landscape / Re: How Would You Edit This Bracketed Landscape?
« on: March 24, 2014, 04:02:58 PM »
Thanks for the edit. The underexposed shot helps the sun to stand out there.

Landscape / Re: How Would You Edit This Bracketed Landscape?
« on: March 23, 2014, 01:34:37 AM »
Looks great. Thanks for posting that. Did you export in srgb? I know when I've exported in ProPhoto before the colors don't look right.

Landscape / How Would You Edit This Bracketed Landscape?
« on: March 21, 2014, 03:01:45 PM »
Follow this link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ib7a1n2lbotccdg/0bkSoLCrcy to download a bracketed series of a Maui sunset I took this past June. The image itself is not incredible, but I am curious to see different techniques for editing. I did this once before with a picture from Death Valley, but this is a bracketed series.

Feel free to download the files and edit the picture as you normally would. I would say to just use what is actually in the image already, although if you want to replace the sky, go for it--I'd be curious to know how that is done. Also, it would be great if you could post what program(s) and techniques you use to achieve the final result. You can do an HDR if you want or just use one image.

Also, the files are on Dropbox. You don't need Dropbox to download the files, but if you don't have it and want to get it for cloud storage, you can use this link: https://db.tt/oBwlTLd2 to do so. We would both get an extra 500mb of storage if you use that link. No need to do so if you don't want Dropbox though, just thought I would put it out there.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / ISO 50 produces cleaner shadows?
« on: March 20, 2014, 07:08:13 PM »
On both my 6d and 5dii ISO 50 had cleaner shadows than ISO 100. Any explanation for this? Thanks in advance.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / 6d Banding/Posterization in Blue Sky
« on: March 20, 2014, 04:58:12 PM »
I just got a 6d with 24-105 from B&H in hopes of replacing my 5dii with 24-105. I really like a few things about the 6d, but there are a few issues I am dealing with.

1) See the attached images. They are screenshots of the same picture shot at 100 ISO and f22 to show the dust spots. There is noticeable banding in the blue sky when viewed in Lightroom 4. I have read in a review on either B&H or Amazon that someone else had this problem--has anyone else experienced this with the 6d? There are no issues with my 5dii.

2) There are also a number of dust spots on the sensor. These can be seen in one of the images. Is that common for a brand new camera?

Thanks in advance.

Photography Technique / Re: Upsizing a landscape picture technique
« on: March 01, 2014, 12:20:44 AM »
Any thoughts? Thanks.

Photography Technique / Upsizing a landscape picture technique
« on: February 26, 2014, 05:34:20 PM »
Hello all,

I rented a d800e over Christmas and took the same picture as I did with my 5d mark ii. I upsized the picture to a 60"x40" and printed off a 12"x8" section from both cameras. As expected, the d800e won hands down. The 8x12 from the d800e looks like a normal picture to me--I can't tell it's been upsized. My question is if anyone has a good technique for upsizing that would diminish the resolution gap the d800e has over the 5d mark ii/iii?

With these photos, I upsized in CS6 to 60x40, sharpened in Nik's Output Sharpener Pro 3 and added +60 sharpening in Lightroom with a .8 radius. I have tried other upsizing programs, but they all seem to look fake to me. I think Photoshop does a better job, but maybe the other ones look better in print.

See the attached pictures. The one with the red stripe in the bottom middle is from the 5d mark ii, using the 17-40 @ f8 and 400 iso, the one with the yellow stripe on the bottom middle is from the d800e, using the nikkor 16-35 f4 @ f8 and 400 iso.

Any chance of a waterproof point and shoot camera being released that shoots in raw? (This excludes the newer Nikon one, I want a pocketable camera).

Pages: [1] 2 3